Alternatives to Animal testing.

Jiro said:
only way to live like that is to live like Theodore Kaczynski
Click to expand...

And he could have been testing his little bombs on all those cute little woodland creatures.:cool2:
 
jillio said:
And he could have been testing his little bombs on all those cute little woodland creatures.:cool2:
Click to expand...

:hmm: good point. maybe a poor example. how about.... Henry David Thoreau?
 
Hear Again said:
Can you prove that, dreama?
Click to expand...

The proof is that some ex vivisectors are now against animal testing since they say the method does not work. Some doctors, vets and scientists say that it does not work.

Their logic is sound enough for me.

I'm neither a doctor or a scientist so I can only provide links to these people who know better then I do. At the end of the day I can only repeat what the information I get from knowledgable and scientific sources and you can only repeat the knowledge from vivisectors who are hooked on animal cruelty.

I keep animals and I know that they are differant to us in many ways and similar to us then others. Some things would kill me but wouldn't kill my rats. Somethings would kill my rats or my dog and I would would perfecly ok.

For example I cannot give Jilli chocolate. But I can eat as much chocolate as I wash and be perfectly healthy. So someone could prove that chocolate was unhealthy by feeding it to a dog and telling everyone to stop eating chocolate.
 
lol

Reminds me of the "Life Cereal" commercial.


"Mikey likes it!"

Way of base here I know!

Sorry!
:giggle:
 
jillio said:
Okay. He killed 'em and ate 'em! Good old Waldon Pond.:giggle:
Click to expand...

:hmm: another epic fail on my part. hmmm I'm running out of names. oh wait. it's not epic fail. it's because it's a reality and the fact of life that we all need animals to live! oh the irony! :laugh2:
 
Jiro said:
:hmm: another epic fail on my part. hmmm I'm running out of names. oh wait. it's not epic fail. it's because it's a reality and the fact of life that we all need animals to live! oh the irony! :laugh2:
Click to expand...

:laugh2:
 
dreama said:
The proof is that some ex vivisectors are now against animal testing since they say the method does not work. Some doctors, vets and scientists say that it does not work.

Their logic is sound enough for me.

That's not proof or logic. Its vacillating.

I'm neither a doctor or a scientist so I can only provide links to these people who know better then I do. At the end of the day I can only repeat what the information I get from knowledgable and scientific sources and you can only repeat the knowledge from vivisectors who are hooked on animal cruelty.

You'd do much better to process it and add a dash of critical thinking before you parrot it. But I suppose a little critical thought is just too much effort.

I keep animals and I know that they are differant to us in many ways and similar to us then others. Some things would kill me but wouldn't kill my rats. Somethings would kill my rats or my dog and I would would perfecly ok.

And rat poison would kill all 3 of you. Guess how we discovered that?

For example I cannot give Jilli chocolate. But I can eat as much chocolate as I wash and be perfectly healthy. So someone could prove that chocolate was unhealthy by feeding it to a dog and telling everyone to stop eating chocolate.
Click to expand...

A Vegan saying they can eat all the chocolate that they want and still be healthy? With all of that saturated fat and refined sugar? Are you really a Vegan? You've been joshing us, haven't you? And what's up with giving your dog chocolate? Are you testing chocolate on your dog? Shame on you, Dreama.

Give it to Mikey. He won't eat it. He hates everything. (That one was for you, Babyblue!):giggle:
 
jillio said:
A Vegan saying they can eat all the chocolate that they want and still be healthy? With all of that saturated fat and refined sugar? Are you really a Vegan? You've been joshing us, haven't you? And what's up with giving your dog chocolate? Are you testing chocolate on your dog? Shame on you, Dreama.
Click to expand...

Touche!
 
dreama said:
The proof is that some ex vivisectors are now against animal testing since they say the method does not work. Some doctors, vets and scientists say that it does not work.

Their logic is sound enough for me.

I'm neither a doctor or a scientist so I can only provide links to these people who know better then I do. At the end of the day I can only repeat what the information I get from knowledgable and scientific sources and you can only repeat the knowledge from vivisectors who are hooked on animal cruelty.

I keep animals and I know that they are differant to us in many ways and similar to us then others. Some things would kill me but wouldn't kill my rats. Somethings would kill my rats or my dog and I would would perfecly ok.

For example I cannot give Jilli chocolate. But I can eat as much chocolate as I wash and be perfectly healthy. So someone could prove that chocolate was unhealthy by feeding it to a dog and telling everyone to stop eating chocolate.
Click to expand...

Something can kill your dog and you'd be okay with that? I certainly wouldn't. If anything happened to Tigger because of something poisonous she accidentally ate, I don't know what I'd do, but I do know it would devastate me.
 
dreama said:
For example I cannot give Jilli chocolate. But I can eat as much chocolate as I wash and be perfectly healthy. So someone could prove that chocolate was unhealthy by feeding it to a dog and telling everyone to stop eating chocolate.
Click to expand...

Didn't you know that eating too much chocolate makes you fat? That's not healthy.
 
Back
Top