Alternatives to Animal testing.

jillio said:
Excellent post, Aleser. I thank you for sharing your first hand experience on this matter. I have absolutely no objection to those who chose a Vegan lifestyle, whether it be for health concerns or for ethical concerns. As a matter of fact, I admire the dedication it takes to adhere to a Vegan diet. My problem is with those who use a personal choice to dedicate themselves to a Vegan lifestyle to protest against those procedures that can and do save lives and improve quality of life for millions. Especially when they claim that the Vegan diet is far healthier, and then deny the opportunity to achieve greater health to others through protest of proper scientific testing of medications and procedures. I certainly don't object to the ethical principles behind the Vegan choice. What I object to is the distortion of those ethical principles that would require sacrificing human life in favor of protecting animal life.
Click to expand...

Eh, I put it right up with the old days of using animal-based insulin.. you weren't 'really' a vegan in some people's eyes if you decided to stay alive by using it. There are simply some people, most often the healthy ones never faced with their life versus an animal's life, that will not look beyond their 'truth' in the situation and accept the reality- your choices do not save the world, and they don't give you the right to judge it.

I suppose arguing it is moot point, though. My own sig :giggle: should remind me of how silly it is.
 
Aleser said:
Eh, I put it right up with the old days of using animal-based insulin.. you weren't 'really' a vegan in some people's eyes if you decided to stay alive by using it. There are simply some people, most often the healthy ones never faced with their life versus an animal's life, that will not look beyond their 'truth' in the situation and accept the reality- your choices do not save the world, and they don't give you the right to judge it.

I suppose arguing it is moot point, though. My own sig :giggle: should remind me of how silly it is.
Click to expand...

If you are in a life and death situation then of course you should take medicine that was tested on animals because everything is. HOWEVER they were also tested on humans afterwards. Many trials don't work on human volunteers and their are even cases of drugs that worked perfectly fine on rats and monkeys but on humans they did a lot of damage.

Vivisectors ignore the tests they do on animals. I recently found out about one of the drugs I used to take for epilepsy. It causes cancer in rats. I've taken about 30 of those tablets all at once (I was suicidal at the time). I still don't have cancer.

Also penicillin was found without animal testing. In some animals it doesnt work though so had they tested on those animals we may not have got penicillin.

I give the links because they are by people who are scientists and doctors and can speak more knowlegably and elquantly then I can since I'm neither a scientist or a doctor. But their ARE scientists, doctors and vets who are against animal testing. Their are even ex vivisectionists who give testimony that animal testing doesn't work.

Their are lots of new aproaches on the market. So animal testing is definately out dated.

And besides you can take drugs or treatment that was tested on animals and still be against that. I would never have stopped mum from taking treatment as long as they were on the market for at least 10 years (for safety reasons) Even if they were tested on animals since I would be fully aware that they worked DESPITE animal testing not because of animal testing.

Talking about cancer. I read about a treatment that has come about without animal testing. That was funded by the humane research trust. Unfortunately mum had died by then but it could have helped her if she'd taken it.
 
dreama said:
If you are in a life and death situation then of course you should take medicine that was tested on animals because everything is. HOWEVER they were also tested on humans afterwards. Many trials don't work on human volunteers and their are even cases of drugs that worked perfectly fine on rats and monkeys but on humans they did a lot of damage.

Vivisectors ignore the tests they do on animals. I recently found out about one of the drugs I used to take for epilepsy. It causes cancer in rats. I've taken about 30 of those tablets all at once (I was suicidal at the time). I still don't have cancer.

Also penicillin was found without animal testing. In some animals it doesnt work though so had they tested on those animals we may not have got penicillin.

I give the links because they are by people who are scientists and doctors and can speak more knowlegably and elquantly then I can since I'm neither a scientist or a doctor. But their ARE scientists, doctors and vets who are against animal testing. Their are even ex vivisectionists who give testimony that animal testing doesn't work.

Their are lots of new aproaches on the market. So animal testing is definately out dated.

And besides you can take drugs or treatment that was tested on animals and still be against that. I would never have stopped mum from taking treatment as long as they were on the market for at least 10 years (for safety reasons) Even if they were tested on animals since I would be fully aware that they worked DESPITE animal testing not because of animal testing.

Talking about cancer. I read about a treatment that has come about without animal testing. That was funded by the humane research trust. Unfortunately mum had died by then but it could have helped her if she'd taken it.
Click to expand...

Tell you what. You refuse to take any drug that was tested on animals, and refuse any medical procedure that was developed as a result of animal research. When you can live up to that, you will have the courage of your convictions. Until then, you are spouting steam, because if your life was at risk, we all know you would be more than willing to take the meds and have the surgery to save your own life. You really need to get a grip.
 
jillio said:
Tell you what. You refuse to take any drug that was tested on animals, and refuse any medical procedure that was developed as a result of animal research. When you can live up to that, you will have the courage of your convictions. Until then, you are spouting steam, because if your life was at risk, we all know you would be more than willing to take the meds and have the surgery to save your own life. You really need to get a grip.
Click to expand...

She does need to get that grip, but I disagree with you. I really don't think she'd do it. She'd let a life threatening illness kill her for her "cause". There's thousands of people like her. It's lunacy.
 
jillio said:
Tell you what. You refuse to take any drug that was tested on animals, and refuse any medical procedure that was developed as a result of animal research. When you can live up to that, you will have the courage of your convictions. Until then, you are spouting steam, because if your life was at risk, we all know you would be more than willing to take the meds and have the surgery to save your own life. You really need to get a grip.
Click to expand...

Well said. I would have been dead of myxodemia by now if it weren't for animal testing.

As for Vegan as a diet, I will never be one though anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3 of my meals tend to be vegetarian in nature. I like meat too much. There is considerable evidence humans evolved to be omnivores. Even so, the American diet is a tad unhealthy.
 
Last edited:
Oceanbreeze said:
She does need to get that grip, but I disagree with you. I really don't think she'd do it. She'd let a life threatening illness kill her for her "cause". There's thousands of people like her. It's lunacy.
Click to expand...

Personally, I don't see the strength of conviction that would take coming from her.
 
deafskeptic said:
Well said. I would have been dead of myxodemia by now if it weren't for animal testing.

As for Vegan as a diet, I will never be one though anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3 of my meals tend to be vegetarian in nature. I like meat too much. There is considerable evidence evolved to be omnivores. Even so, the American diet is a tad unhealthy.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The American diet is not the healthiest in the world. But as I said in a reply to Aleser...it is not the Vegan diet or lifestyle that I object to. It is the gross distortion of the fundamental prinicples of such used in this way. Good for dreama, she's a Vegan. I hope she has what it takes to be true to that lifestyle. But she has absolutely no right to deny helath care to others, or to prevent medical advances that save millions of life every year due to animal testing and experimentation to anyone else. It is unbelievably arrogant.
 
You've all got it wrong. All these things you keep saying you would be alive it wasn't for animal testing just is NOT TRUE.

Animal testing has been round for a long time. So has observation of cases, human trials, and other methods. Not to mention the experiements of humans during Japanese occupation and Nazi germany which also paved the way for medical progress.

So no you weren't there because some animals got tortured in a few futile experiements. You are there DESPITE that fact.

I am fully convinced that my mum WOULD STILL BE ALIVE IF ANIMAL TESTING HAD BEEN SCRAPPED. AND MORE SCIENTIFICLLY VALUBLE OPTION WAS AVAILABE.

It makes me feel really sad that so many people are ok about torturing animals and making false claims about it. I want to be sick.
 
dreama said:
You've all got it wrong. All these things you keep saying you would be alive it wasn't for animal testing just is NOT TRUE.

Animal testing has been round for a long time. So has observation of cases, human trials, and other methods. Not to mention the experiements of humans during Japanese occupation and Nazi germany which also paved the way for medical progress.

So no you weren't there because some animals got tortured in a few futile experiements. You are there DESPITE that fact.

I am fully convinced that my mum WOULD STILL BE ALIVE IF ANIMAL TESTING HAD BEEN SCRAPPED. AND MORE SCIENTIFICLLY VALUBLE OPTION WAS AVAILABE.

It makes me feel really sad that so many people are ok about torturing animals and making false claims about it. I want to be sick.
Click to expand...

Animal testing has nothing to do with your Mum having to wait too long for medical treatment. But your bitterness and anger at the medical community is probably easily explained by the fact that you have not managed to work through your grief process in a healthy manner. I'd suggest you get some help from a qualified therapist to deal with those issues.

I wouldn't get sick if I were you. You might have to take some medicine that was tested on animals to get better. And then where would you be with your holier than thou ethics?

"Its not true, its not true, its not true, its not true". Saying it again and again, especially in the face of completely contradictory evidence does not make it so, dreama. It does, however create the possibility that you are in denial, or worse, delusional.
 
dreama said:
You've all got it wrong. All these things you keep saying you would be alive it wasn't for animal testing just is NOT TRUE.

Animal testing has been round for a long time. So has observation of cases, human trials, and other methods. Not to mention the experiements of humans during Japanese occupation and Nazi germany which also paved the way for medical progress.

So no you weren't there because some animals got tortured in a few futile experiements. You are there DESPITE that fact.

I am fully convinced that my mum WOULD STILL BE ALIVE IF ANIMAL TESTING HAD BEEN SCRAPPED. AND MORE SCIENTIFICLLY VALUBLE OPTION WAS AVAILABE.

It makes me feel really sad that so many people are ok about torturing animals and making false claims about it. I want to be sick.
Click to expand...

Dreama. Animals are euthanise daily .. Animals are tested on daily medications, lotions, and even the soap you bath in plus more. Unless you are one that TRUELY assure that ANY of the products that you use saids otherwise. You are just as guilty as the rest of us that approves of animal testing. Look up some of your household products and items you use in your own home. Sorry but it may be a shock to you.

The shoes you wear. The clothes you wear the laundry detergent etc. Read all the labels..

Let me know if you don't use ANY products that has been tested.

If you do live such life

Then please tell us how you live such life truely.
 
Babyblue said:
Dreama. Animals are euthanise daily .. Animals are tested on daily medications, lotions, and even the soap you bath in plus more. Unless you are one that TRUELY assure that ANY of the products that you use saids otherwise. You are just as guilty as the rest of us that approves of animal testing. Look up some of your household products and items you use in your own home. Sorry but it may be a shock to you.

The shoes you wear. The clothes you wear the laundry detergent etc. Read all the labels..

Let me know if you don't use ANY products that has been tested.

If you do live such life

Then please tell us how you live such life truely.
Click to expand...

:gpost:

I didn't think of all that, but you're absolutely right. Animal testing is done on alot of things. It's not just drugs and surgical procedures. It's things we use every single day of our lives.
 
dreama,

I honestly can't understand why you think your mother would still be alive if animal testing were stopped.

Animal testing allows for the *advancement* of research for terminal diseases like cancer. That's why I fully support it.

There's a *very* good possibility that my mother would still be alive (from terminal pancreatic cancer) provided animal testing found a cure for cancer. I have no doubt in my mind of that.
 
Oceanbreeze said:
:gpost:

I didn't think of all that, but you're absolutely right. Animal testing is done on alot of things. It's not just drugs and surgical procedures. It's things we use every single day of our lives.
Click to expand...

That's true. If it were not for animal testing, we wouldn't have many of the things we do.
 
jillio said:
Animal testing has nothing to do with your Mum having to wait too long for medical treatment. But your bitterness and anger at the medical community is probably easily explained by the fact that you have not managed to work through your grief process in a healthy manner. I'd suggest you get some help from a qualified therapist to deal with those issues.

I wouldn't get sick if I were you. You might have to take some medicine that was tested on animals to get better. And then where would you be with your holier than thou ethics?

"Its not true, its not true, its not true, its not true". Saying it again and again, especially in the face of completely contradictory evidence does not make it so, dreama. It does, however create the possibility that you are in denial, or worse, delusional.
Click to expand...

:gpost:

If it were not for animal testing, I wouldn't have the meds I need to keep my Bipolar relatively stable. And for that, I am thankful.
 
Back
Top