Al Gore accused of sexual misconduct

Liberal Strategy #1 When confronted with a valid argument, resort to character assasination. Call your opponent a racist, or a skinhead. In a worst case scenario, call them Hitler.
No names were used. You chose to read it that way. Typical response of someone that has no debate. You still ignore my post. Over and over. Only reply to the other comments.

The original purpose of this thread was to take an editorial from an unknown source and present it as proof that Al Gore is guilty of untold sexual crimes, and that Conservatives are always convicted while Liberals are always released. I offered a differing view. You have repeatedly ignored those posts, (post numbers 19, 29, 58) while taking the ball and running with everything else. You are avoiding those replies. That is because YOU HAVE NO REPLY.

Have a nice day. Enjoy your thread.
 
Tell that to Al Gore. :giggle:

I'm telling it to you. You are the one that made the comment. As far as Al Gore is concerned, I'm certain he is already aware of that fact. Especially since he was never proven guilty, and this is obviously a case of false allegation.

But, at least you are consistent with your insensitivity. First make fun of someone who died, and then make fun of sexual assault. Nice.
 
I'm telling it to you. You are the one that made the comment. As far as Al Gore is concerned, I'm certain he is already aware of that fact. Especially since he was never proven guilty, and this is obviously a case of false allegation.

But, at least you are consistent with your insensitivity. First make fun of someone who died, and then make fun of sexual assault. Nice.

I am not making fun of sexual assault, I am making fun of double standards.

Just in case you were confused.

So, if a Democrat praised Byrd, should they be forced to resign like Lott?
 
I am not making fun of sexual assault, I am making fun of double standards.

Just in case you were confused.

So, if a Democrat praised Byrd, should they be forced to resign like Lott?

Actually, your post was making fun of sexual assault. Your insensitivity doesn't allow you to see it.

Does it take you a long time to come up with these convoluted questions that have nothing whatsoever to do with anything?
 
Actually, your post was making fun of sexual assault. Your insensitivity doesn't allow you to see it.

Does it take you a long time to come up with these convoluted questions that have nothing whatsoever to do with anything?

Does it take you a long time to understand what a "double standard" is?
 
Does it take you a long time to understand what a "double standard" is?

Do you have trouble remembering your own posts?

LOL - that is why it is more believable that he assaulted someone for sex

Sexual assault has nothing to do with sex, and this statement has nothing to do with double standards.
 
Since the day the Gores announced their split after 40 years of marriage, I’ve predicted that there is more to this story. And as I wrote last week, Gore’s extramarital affairs have been long known in D.C.’s Democratic circles, but he was protected out of fondness for the family, his political allies’ loyalty and the media’s innate sympathy for Democrats. Had these same allegations – sexual assault, extramarital affairs in the White House—been made against a Republican public official, the mainstream media would have been all over the story.


National Enquirer’s Al Gore Sexual Assault Allegations Ignored by MSM; Oregon May Prosecute - Big Journalism


Liberal Logic Lesson #3

When accused of having double standards, twist what opponent says so that it means what opponent had not implied. It is especially important to twist it so that it means something repulsive.
 
It is awfully amusing to see those who are defending Al Gore also calling him sleazy :giggle:

Without even realizing it. :laugh2:
 
Hmm. perhaps I can show example of conservative logic:

1. Gore is accused of sexual misconduct.

2. he is an a liberal - therefore he is the enemy of all that is good according to conservatives.

3. Is there any evidence that he is guilty? if yes, proceed to 4. If no, proceed to 5.

4. He should be tarred and feathered, thrown into jail to rot.

5. No? He is an evil socialist communist satanist liberal and the enemy of all that is good - therefore he's guilty of sexual abuse because he's a liberal.

6. Off to jail he goes. He gets the same treatment as 4.
 
Back
Top