Abortion Doctor Shot Dead

Yet Obama ensured that our tax dollars will fund overseas abortion providers in other countries. Go figure.
 
Obama has insured that health care organizations from the U.S. that deliver services to underpriviledged in other countries will receive tax dollars, and will not be refused those tax dollars simply because one of the services they provide happens to be abortion.

And that has nothing to do with the hypocricy of an anti-abortion zealot murdering a doctor simply because he did not agree with his practices, even though they were legal.
 
jillio said:
Obama has insured that health care organizations from the U.S. that deliver services to underpriviledged in other countries will receive tax dollars, and will not be refused those tax dollars simply because one of the services they provide happens to be abortion.
Click to expand...

People make it sound like Obama went ahead and used our tax dollars just for abortion only.
 
shel90 said:
People make it sound like Obama went ahead and used our tax dollars just for abortion only.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know. It seems that is the message they are trying to give, but it is innacurrate and misleading.
 
Liebling:-))) said:
Accord the definition "pro-choice" means is support every´s choice. Force every´s choice to have an abortion, make no sense to me. :scratch:
Click to expand...

Those parents who supposedly supports pro-choice had force their daughters to have an abortion, so don't tell me what doesn't make sense and what does make sense. Talk to your followers, I guess they don't know the define of pro-choice.
 
Cheri said:
Those parents who supposedly supports pro-choice had force their daughters to have an abortion, so don't tell me what doesn't make sense and what does make sense. Talk to your followers.
Click to expand...

Then those parents were hypocrates because being pro-choice is about letting the woman choose what to do with the pregnancy. If they are forcing abortion, then they are not really pro-choice, then.
 
Um, using our tax dollars to help fund overseas abortion programs isn't the smartest thing to do regardless of what you think. This is not about preventative medicine we're talking about. Sorry. My tax dollar is being abused and misused as we speak, not to mention the murder of millions of innocent human beings. Time to cut that program out with an ax and save some money for a change rather than to create an additional $1.8 trillion dollar deficit problem for this year with money we don't have. Money is clearly being misapplied here.
 
I was gonna make a joke about how Obama is indeed a secret muslim and funding abortion is his way of killing the Americans without being suspicious or getting caught.

But then I thought "Some people might actually take me seriously."

And that's just... sad.
 
Daredevel7 said:
I was gonna make a joke about how Obama is indeed a secret muslim and funding abortion is his way of killing the Americans without being suspicious or getting caught.

But then I thought "Some people might actually take me seriously."

And that's just... sad.
Click to expand...

:laugh2: You're bad!:lol:
 
Daredevel7 said:
I was gonna make a joke about how Obama is indeed a secret muslim and funding abortion is his way of killing the Americans without being suspicious or getting caught.

But then I thought "Some people might actually take me seriously."

And that's just... sad.
Click to expand...

Sad that people would take u seriously or sad that Obama is funding these clinics overseas?

I thought your comment was funny. I guess I have a sarcastic sense of humor. :)
 
kokonut said:
Um, using our tax dollars to help fund overseas abortion programs isn't the smartest thing to do regardless of what you think. This is not about preventative medicine we're talking about. Sorry. My tax dollar is being abused and misused as we speak, not to mention the murder of millions of innocent human beings. Time to cut that program out with an ax instead of creating an additional $1.8 trillion dollar deficit problem for this year with money we don't have. Money is clearly being misapplied here.
Click to expand...

Again, money is not being used to fund overseas abortion programs. Obama has simply ruled that money that health care organizations receive cannot be denied based on the fact that abortion is one of the services offered. Get your facts straight.

And abortion, quite often is preventative. You need to get your facts straight on that one, as well.

You would do better to worry about the money that has gone into the killing of innocent human beings during the Iraq war, and less about interfering with women's right to make a choice regarding their health care treatment.
 
shel90 said:
Sad that people would take u seriously or sad that Obama is funding these clinics overseas?

I thought your comment was funny. I guess I have a sarcastic sense of humor. :)
Click to expand...

Haha the former of course. :)
 
Kind of ironic to talk of war when more were purposely and savagely aborted than those killed wars by a thousand times over. Both are sad events, no doubt. But it's a fact that we have to acknowledge about the human race and the continuing moral decay. Simply put. I have the right to protest about the use of my tax dollars in how it fund programs. It simply a sad state of affairs to see people cheer on over these things thinking they're the next best thing since sliced bread.
 
kokonut said:
Kind of ironic to talk of war when more were purposely and savagely aborted than those killed wars by a thousand times over. Both are sad events, no doubt. But it's a fact that we have to acknowledge about the human race and the continuing moral decay. Simply put. I have the right to protest about the use of my tax dollars in how it fund programs. It simply a sad state of affairs to see people cheer on over these things thinking they're the next best thing since sliced bread.
Click to expand...

Ah, but there you are. It is an issue of morality. You do not have the right, under any circumstances, to dictate the morality of another. Stop trying. It makes you appear to have an underserved superiority complex. And if you are going to make outlandish claims regarding numbers, you need to provide some hard and fast, reliable, verifiable numbers.

Now, get back on topic. The brutal murder of a doctor in the vestibule of his church by a zealot who has made his whole existence about dictating the morality of others.
 
Not dictating but noting that the decay continues. We're all weak, granted, and thus are easily succumbed to this decay.

An unfortunate circumstance that was unnecessary in the shooting. I suppose moral decay begets moral decay?

But since you asked for facts.

Estimated current global monthly average: 1,206,000 abortions
Abortion statistics and other data

But let's get back on "topic" as you suggested/demanded.
 
netrox said:
What bothers is that pro-lifers don't get it - it is NOT their fetus at all and it's a woman's RIGHT to decide what she'll do. If she wants to terminate, that's her right. If she wants to keep it, that's her right.

Kokonut, as usual, you are just sprouting non-sense. You cannot be pro-choice if you force a woman to have an abortion. It's anti-choice, the VERY same philosophy that you practice with women being denied the right to have an abortion if she chooses to do so.

Being pro-choice is about giving a woman the choices she can have, not forcing choices on her. Think about all the unwanted pregnancies and mothers who are seriously burdened with having kids just because they did NOT want them in the first place. I know a few women and they're miserable - they take medications to treat their depression and often exhibit chronic stress.

It's a matter of choice on HOW you value life of a fetus but you have no right to impose that on a woman who's deciding that her fetus has no value whatsoever and should be ended.
Click to expand...


:gpost:
 
shel90 said:
Then those parents were hypocrates because being pro-choice is about letting the woman choose what to do with the pregnancy. If they are forcing abortion, then they are not really pro-choice, then.
Click to expand...

Yes, that´s right.
 
Cheri said:
Those parents who supposedly supports pro-choice had force their daughters to have an abortion, so don't tell me what doesn't make sense and what does make sense. Talk to your followers, I guess they don't know the define of pro-choice.
Click to expand...

Have you read Netrox´s post #42?

Accord Netrox´s post...

"You cannot be pro-choice if you force a woman to have an abortion. It's anti-choice, the VERY same philosophy that you practice with women being denied the right to have an abortion if she chooses to do so. "

They are not truly pro-choice supporters if they forces their children to abort.

I guess that some pro-life supporters don´t know what definition "pro-choice" means. :shrug:



 
Back
Top