A Question For Homosexuals

rolling7 said:
Such as unintentional children and no ability to care for the child. As I've said before...."If you can't feed them, don't breed them."
On the purely homosexual couple, it is NOT at all uncommon for the couple to break up/divorce and while it is an adult issue, the children suffer. For example in a hereto's situation child support is a relatively easy issue for the court to figure out. Not so with the homo's situation, as what has been seen in recent time is a big mess. I could give you one of these mess happening right here in Houston but it would take us way off topic.
Click to expand...

I don't understand why court will have challenges figuring out a "homo's situation"? The court does not discriminate between genders. They look at couple's income and determine who pays for what, etc.
 
rolling7 said:
You just said the magic words, and I hope StSapphire read them.
Neither I nor anyone else can "convince me" of anything. You must convince yourself. That is the only possibility.
This is the #1 problem of almost all people today, they don't use their brain for learning and convince themself. They will rather go on line, look it up in a book, listen to some motivation speaker and on-and-on. Anything but use their own brain
"Can I make you happy?", this is a real question from me to you and you probably will respond "Thanks, but no thanks." You are saying that for your own reason but the truth is I'll never , and never have, ask anyone that question because I know it is impossible! Only YOU can make yourself happy. Don't feel bad, because most all people today don't know that neither.
Take the popular song sung at many public events, "God Bless America ". People who sing the song really mean for it to happen. But did you, and the many, many who sing the song know it is impossible for God to bless America? Why? Because the good book says so. Before any poster jumps on me about the reason being America's tolerance of gays, my reason is not even close to that.
So here again, you are distracting yourself into thinking I am making this about homosexual sex when all along I have been speaking of consequences and how people want to bury them our, at least, deny them.
Here is a suggestion for you, no harm meant only helpful words. If your's is not living, and do make him first if at all possible, find a gentle grandfather-type guy and sit down with an open mind into learning "life experience" from him. Just let him start from the beginning and go forward. Once in awhile ask: "What did that teach you or what would you do different?" HIS brain can teach you more than any on line web site, more than any library can.
Click to expand...

:confused::confused::confused:
 
missywinks said:
:confused::confused::confused:
Click to expand...

Come here, come here. Sit back here with us to watch rolling7 to go on his/her off tangent rants. We are currently trying to figure out how to connect together the rants and what point(s) s/he is trying to make.
 
jillio said:
Where did I deny that it happens to gays? You are the one that keeps pointing the finger at gays. It happens to gays and it happens to straight. It is also contracted by people through other avenues than sexual contact. Female to female holds the least risk of transmission. The moral of the story: safe sex and universal precautions, no matter what sexual orientation you are.

What is your solution? Everyone remain celibate?
Click to expand...

No, the catholic priest tried that....and everyone knows where they went.
If you dared to read my previous post, and you must not be if you ask this question, I endorse responsible sex.....one person with one and only one person for life.
However, I totally expect you to come back with: "Impossible and unreasonable."
So don't bother.
 
rolling7 said:
No, the catholic priest tried that....and everyone knows where they went.
If you dared to read my previous post, and you must not be if you ask this question, I endorse responsible sex.....one person with one and only one person for life.
However, I totally expect you to come back with: "Impossible and unreasonable."
So don't bother.
Click to expand...

Hey!! We have one thing in common. I endorse responsible sex, too! You may not be aware of this. But a LOT of people here endorse responsible sex. Unfortunately, just because YOU are responsible doesn't mean your partner will be. It's kinda sad, isn't it?
 
rolling7 said:
You are a johnny-come-late to this thread. All I can say is start at post #1 and work your way down.
Click to expand...

No, it just gets more confusing. It doesnt seem like anyone understands what your points are. The majority of us endorse responsible sex and it has nothing to do with our sexual orientation. That is where you do not make sense.
 
missywinks said:
No, it just gets more confusing. It doesnt seem like anyone understands what your points are. The majority of us endorse responsible sex and it has nothing to do with our sexual orientation. That is where you do not make sense.
Click to expand...

Besides, your comments are pretty off track. AquaBlue was asking everyone if homosexuals were normally born homosexual or if they became homosexual as a lifestyle choice? So that implies to me, that you feel homosexuals do not have responsible sex? :roll:
 
missywinks said:
Besides, your comments are pretty off track. AquaBlue was asking everyone if homosexuals were normally born homosexual or if they became homosexual as a lifestyle choice? So that implies to me, that you feel homosexuals do not have responsible sex? :roll:
Click to expand...

You are the confused one because you do not follow the WHOLE thread. You are right about the OP but we all got a little off topic when the case of medically proof of straight/gay/bi/etc. got discussed. Then we went a little off topic with "consequences". Choice was also discussed. So just continue to read from post #1 until all clicks for you.
To answer you question of right now: Yes, I do feel homosexuals do not have responsible sex..........and I feel the same way about heterosexuals and all others.
 
Daredevel7 said:
Come here, come here. Sit back here with us to watch rolling7 to go on his/her off tangent rants. We are currently trying to figure out how to connect together the rants and what point(s) s/he is trying to make.
Click to expand...

Nah, I gave up on that a while ago. S/he's not making any points, s/he's just a delusional prude who gets the vapors when thinking about sex of any kind.

rolling7 said:
No, the catholic priest tried that....and everyone knows where they went.
If you dared to read my previous post, and you must not be if you ask this question, I endorse responsible sex.....one person with one and only one person for life.
However, I totally expect you to come back with: "Impossible and unreasonable."
So don't bother.
Click to expand...

None of your posts make any sense. The only coherent point you've made is that you find sex among anyone ever to be a terribly disgusting immoral act.

And yes, lifetime monogamy is unreasonable and honestly a stupid solution. But way to go on predicting my response. :D

rolling7 said:
You are a johnny-come-late to this thread. All I can say is start at post #1 and work your way down.
Click to expand...

Yep, that way she can be just as completely perplexed as everyone else, because your delusional ramblings just get more and more incoherent over time in this thread.

missywinks said:
Besides, your comments are pretty off track. AquaBlue was asking everyone if homosexuals were normally born homosexual or if they became homosexual as a lifestyle choice? So that implies to me, that you feel homosexuals do not have responsible sex? :roll:
Click to expand...

No, no. S/he thinks that any sex is irresponsible unless you're forced to stick together for your entire life the instant you let some dude see you nekkid. Otherwise you'll both catch the aids and get pregnant, no matter what.
 
rolling7 said:
You are the confused one because you do not follow the WHOLE thread. You are right about the OP but we all got a little off topic when the case of medically proof of straight/gay/bi/etc. got discussed. Then we went a little off topic with "consequences". Choice was also discussed. So just continue to read from post #1 until all clicks for you.
To answer you question of right now: Yes, I do feel homosexuals do not have responsible sex..........and I feel the same way about heterosexuals and all others.
Click to expand...

Nope, I've followed this thread from the beginning and you make just as little sense now as you have ever since the beginning. Don't flatter yourself into thinking your ramblings in here are understandable.
 
missywinks said:
I don't understand why court will have challenges figuring out a "homo's situation"? The court does not discriminate between genders. They look at couple's income and determine who pays for what, etc.
Click to expand...

And, of those homosexuals involved in a long term relationship and have taken on the responsibility of raising a child: they are far less likely to split up than a hetero couple.

Someone on here needs to inform themselves.:cool2:
 
rolling7 said:
No, the catholic priest tried that....and everyone knows where they went.
If you dared to read my previous post, and you must not be if you ask this question, I endorse responsible sex.....one person with one and only one person for life.
However, I totally expect you to come back with: "Impossible and unreasonable."
So don't bother.
Click to expand...

Not impossible, but highly unlikely. And extremely unreasonable. What of those whose partners have died at a young age? They are to remain celibate for the remainder of their years?

And I know of many homosexuals who are involved in long term, monogamous relationships. More so, as a matter of fact, than heterosexuals.
 
rolling7 said:
You are the confused one because you do not follow the WHOLE thread. You are right about the OP but we all got a little off topic when the case of medically proof of straight/gay/bi/etc. got discussed. Then we went a little off topic with "consequences". Choice was also discussed. So just continue to read from post #1 until all clicks for you.
To answer you question of right now: Yes, I do feel homosexuals do not have responsible sex..........and I feel the same way about heterosexuals and all others.
Click to expand...

So....you just have a problem with sexually active people in general, huh?
 
StSapphire said:
Nah, I gave up on that a while ago. S/he's not making any points, s/he's just a delusional prude who gets the vapors when thinking about sex of any kind.



None of your posts make any sense. The only coherent point you've made is that you find sex among anyone ever to be a terribly disgusting immoral act.

And yes, lifetime monogamy is unreasonable and honestly a stupid solution. But way to go on predicting my response. :D



Yep, that way she can be just as completely perplexed as everyone else, because your delusional ramblings just get more and more incoherent over time in this thread.



No, no. S/he thinks that any sex is irresponsible unless you're forced to stick together for your entire life the instant you let some dude see you nekkid. Otherwise you'll both catch the aids and get pregnant, no matter what.
Click to expand...

I see I'm not the only one thinking this.
 
I think under Rolling7's definition: I don't have "responsible" sex in the sense that I've had more than one partner. (OMG I'M SUCH A SLUT)

However, I've never had a baby/abortion nor a STD. Never had to go to court (other than one stupid moving violation), never had to go to a doctor for sex related stuff.

Rolling7, do you believe that my "abhorrent" sexual behavior:

1) Is a financial burden to you? If so, how?
2) Wrong? (Why? If for religious reasons, I understand, no need to go further, but if not, then why?)
3) Is just lucky that I haven't had consequences "yet"?
4) Is not the "true picture" of any individual? I'm "rare"?
 
:laugh2:
Daredevel7 said:
I think under Rolling7's definition: I don't have "responsible" sex in the sense that I've had more than one partner. (OMG I'M SUCH A SLUT)

However, I've never had a baby/abortion nor a STD. Never had to go to court (other than one stupid moving violation), never had to go to a doctor for sex related stuff.

Rolling7, do you believe that my "abhorrent" sexual behavior:

1) Is a financial burden to you? If so, how?
2) Wrong? (Why? If for religious reasons, I understand, no need to go further, but if not, then why?)
3) Is just lucky that I haven't had consequences "yet"?
4) Is not the "true picture" of any individual? I'm "rare"?
Click to expand...

What a SLUT you are! :giggle:
 
Back
Top