- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 323
Umm.. being an anti-CI has nothing to do with this, we are not talking about the implant itself , we are currently talking about the use of ASL to communicate with their deaf child because it seem to me parents are not using all the opportunity for their deaf child, perhaps it's because some parents here thinks ASL is no longer needed, why? because they feel that it's delaying their deaf child's speech and language skills, but to me access to spoken lanuage and ASL is the key in the child's development and the greatest and most fundamental gift you can give your deaf child is to provide ALL TOOLS!!!
I agree...it is not the implant that I am against..it is the oral-only view that I am against. Also, all the misconceptions about the Deaf community and ASL limiting deaf/hoh people is what I feel strongly against too.
When someone says "I dont need to expose my child to ASL nor the Deaf community," they are automatically rejecting and discriminating against a group of people on the spot. Deaf children who are in the Deaf community are already rejected by hearing people which is bad enough but to get rejected by oral deaf children is very tragic. It is like saying, "I am not interested in being friends with black people." Never know there could be people that there children could make a lifetime bond with but yet, the parents made that decision for their children when they believe that by being around hearing peers or adults more preferrable.