A body remains might belong to Caylee Anthony's

I remember something vaguely from Chicago in the 1970's and can't recall if it was the Tylenol scare or an individual kidnapping African American children......

there was a black serial killer in the 70's that only took black kids. could that be what you are referring to?

it was around the same time.
 
It doesn't make any differences to me, what color the child is. I don't understand why people just love to play the racism cards. I think the only reason this case got so much attention because there are so many lies in this case and it's true there are so many lies.

No one is playing a "racism card." Just pointing out the inequities in media attention.
 
well a while back a philadelphia boy went missing. it gained national. they searched for days. the child was found in the trunk of a car. the kid was playing hide and go seek and accidently locked himself in... he died in the trunk....


wish i could remember the name to google :hmm:

I didn't hear about the Philly kid....

there was a black serial killer in the 70's that only took black kids. could that be what you are referring to?

it was around the same time.

That is the one.
 
Oh Sad!! I saw another my equine forum about her..

"but the tots mom ordering some major snacks and playing cards yesterday from jail "

WTF!!!!! Disgusting :ugh:
 
Its okay. I'm used to dealing with goofy people! j/k

No, the person that truly believes their own lies is delusional. And, congratulations..the spelling of neurotic is correct, pain meds or no!

I was referring more to a personality disorder that makes an individual overly dependent on others for a sense of self, and is easily led and manipulated into believing that they are doing the right thing despite the fact that they know it is wrong. A partner could easily talk someone like this into covering up for them.

ah thanks for the info. been decades since my psychology courses... :giggle:
 
ayi ayi ayi this thread is getting
knary.gif

thought you like hot debates :shock:
 
Usually I stay out of debates like this because I can get emotionally charged especially when it involves little children.

I always believe people are innocent until proven guilty. Those charged should be given the equal opportunity to prove their innocence until proven guilty.

However when it comes to children, society feels it should be guilty until proven innocent.

I do hope that everyone involved with Caylee Anthony gets closure and little Caylee rests at peace.

Rest in peace, little Caylee.
 
that would make momma anthony guilty as an "accessory to murder" or "accessory after the fact"...


:hmm: wonder if momma anothony would make a claim like that anyway. after all, her stories so far were B.S.

I agree....an accessory if she is covering up for someone. Just wait and see what the evidence at the trial unfolds...
 
Aw that's so sad to seeing that girl suffer and gone. :(

I hope everything will solves the problem soon.
 
Cases like this serve as the ulterior motive to why I am eventually pursuing a MS in criminalistics starting next year. As my first major I did sociology and wanting to help everyone out due to the impression people were all nice and kind, and liars were a rare thing. Once I tried that profession when I got out of college, boy I was in for a hard but well-learned lesson. Even at my previous job, people could do nothing but be complaining bastards even though all I intended was to help them without a second thought.

I believe in the idea of helping out people in the forensic world today, my take on it is that you are still helping even if you keep the answers to yourself after you did the lab results, due to legal boundaries.

Cheri and the side clashing her opinions both have respective reasons for their judgments.

#1 fact that is prior to everything and still applies; is the definition of law. Laws are a collection of rules made by the people which are then enforced by the proper authority. Laws were created to regulate & monitor society's behavior. Society often has scumbags, or people who attempt to cheat the "honest" system, which is ultimately why laws are created.
We cannot control what people think of, this is something that is unregulated. Our government's constitution allows for this.

This is why Cheri's argument still applies - she thought Casey Anthony is a killer immediately due to the way the case progressed. The facts were overwhelmingly against Casey, no matter which way you look at it. The same applied for O.J. Simpson, which serves as a strong counter for the legal action debacle in this case. Everyone with logical thinking had a premonition O.J. killed his wife, yet legal action could not prove this.

Then there is the reason why the laws for fair trials were created. It is to give everyone an equal chance, regardless of race, language, sexual orientation, or any form of discrimination. With plausible reasoning, they will find you guilty or not. This way, guilty people will be served with the proper justice they deserve in "proper format", rather than just jump the gun and put them on the chair or lie detector test.

Yet we do know, there are often mistakes with this system, there are plenty of examples out there, to give a few:
[1] [2]

The real issue is, we know that people lie. If no one could ever lie, even through modern means, such as a truth serum, lie detector tests - there would be no means for a criminal justice system. But reality is, we know people continue to lie and the actual truth serum is highly unreliable.

Fortunately with the ever-improving advancements in forensic science today, we can get more information out of less evidence. I can assure you that they don't work as fast as CSI on TV and a lot of that is fancy mumbo-jumbo, however the lab results are similar and take time but most importantly have legal issues you have to document prior to advancing towards a sudden claim.

On topic, I really wish I was in that crime lab to know what was discovered in the evidence aside from what was said. I hope the child gets proper justice as a result of all this.
 
Anytime a mother is out partying while her child is missing, the smell of death in her car all the lies and other bullshit that woman is guilty as hell
 
wow. i'd hate to have some ad'ers here as part of my jury if i were on trial. that's all i can say.
 
I don't feel sorry if the parents knew what was going on but did nothing to stop the crime.

Case in point:

State says mom knew of sex abuse | burlingtonfreepress.com | The Burlington Free Press

Mother knew that man was molesting her daughter but did nothing to stop him.

I also have a hard time feeling sorry for these kids that get killed. Call me cold but I think that parents sometimes use bad judgments when it comes to family friends, etc and that hurts their kids more than they think.

I think that parents who know about crimes but do not report them are just as guilty in their child's death than the actual perp.
 
I
I also have a hard time feeling sorry for these kids that get killed. Call me cold but I think that parents sometimes use bad judgments when it comes to family friends, etc and that hurts their kids more than they think.

cold isn't the word that comes to mind....


if the parent are unfit, why would you not feel empathy for the child?

did the child ask the parent to be scum?

Does the child ask to be abused physically or sexually?

think the child wants to be neglected?




children do not ask for any of that.
 
Let me propose another question: Millions of kids/people die everyday, go missing, etc.

Why does the media always focus on the white kids/people? What about the millions of other kids who die everyday?

And no, while the kids did not ask for their fates, sometimes their parents are guilty of gross negligence, though not in the majority of the cases.

Why is it so hard for people to watch their kids nowadays?
 
Back
Top