A body remains might belong to Caylee Anthony's

yes, but you are accusing her before she has even gone to trial. she hasn't been evaluated by a psychiatrist yet at her trial, so let's not judge her sanity.

I think it would be perfectly fair to make an assumption in advance that anyone who would murder their own child is not sane.

I don't see why you have a problem with that.:hmm:
 
i thought i heard that the police found evidence of a google search for "chloroform" on casey's computer. if so, wouldn't that information give casey some clue as to its' potential harm?

as for your latter point, I couldn't agree more.

They also found traces in the trunk of the car.
 
I think it would be perfectly fair to make an assumption in advance that anyone who would murder their own child is not sane.

I don't see why you have a problem with that.:hmm:

i have a problem with that because we don't know whether or not casey is mentally ill yet. until that fact is proven, i refuse to pass judgement.

besides, you know what happens to people who make assumptions.
 
i have a problem with that because we don't know whether or not casey is mentally ill yet. until that fact is proven, i refuse to pass judgement.

besides, you know what happens to people who make assumptions.

So you think a person who was not mentally ill could murder their own child?
 
i have a problem with that because we don't know whether or not casey is mentally ill yet. until that fact is proven, i refuse to pass judgement.

besides, you know what happens to people who make assumptions.

I have a problem with alot of the things being discussed in this thread. We don't know jack at this point. The only thing we know is that Casey has been charged. She hasn't gone to trial, so it's way too premature to have any discussion about mental illness or anything else. To suggest that she could be mentally ill implies a reason why she killed her daughter, and we simply don't know that she did.

If she did, that opens up a whole different can of worms. Mental illness is a sticky defense to a crime. It's hard to prove. But, also, there's mental illnesses that may make a person delusional, and therefore, unable to understand the difference between right and wrong. Then, there's sociopathy. In my opinion, a mental illness, but one in which the person KNOWS the act is wrong, but doesn't have the capacity to CARE that it is. If a person is sociopathic, then life long confinement is warranted. In my opinion, treatment won't work. In that instance, you need to protect society from the sociopathic person. When you're dealing with sociopathy, you must think of society first, and the individual, second.
 
So you think a person who was not mentally ill could murder their own child?

yes i do, but a jury hasn't found casey guilty of murder yet. that's what i'm saying. let's wait for the trial before passing judgement.
 
I have a problem with alot of the things being discussed in this thread. We don't know jack at this point. The only thing we know is that Casey has been charged. She hasn't gone to trial, so it's way too premature to have any discussion about mental illness or anything else. To suggest that she could be mentally ill implies a reason why she killed her daughter, and we simply don't know that she did.

If she did, that opens up a whole different can of worms. Mental illness is a sticky defense to a crime. It's hard to prove. But, also, there's mental illnesses that may make a person delusional, and therefore, unable to understand the difference between right and wrong. Then, there's sociopathy. In my opinion, a mental illness, but one in which the person KNOWS the act is wrong, but doesn't have the capacity to CARE that it is. If a person is sociopathic, then life long confinement is warranted. In my opinion, treatment won't work. In that instance, you need to protect society from the sociopathic person. When you're dealing with sociopathy, you must think of society first, and the individual, second.

i couldn't agree with you more, ocean.
 
Considering the searches recovered from the family computer on subjects like how to break necks, it is my opinion she meant to do way more than just knock the child out and party.

Children of that age are difficult to cope with and it is a very stressful time.
 
It's perfectly normal to share your thoughts what you feel about the mother/or an individual. Everyone has their own entitle to say their pieces, it could be anythin'. I don't see anythin' wrong with it.

I do that sometimes, too. :giggle: Oh, well...
 
It's perfectly normal to share your thoughts what you feel about the mother/or an individual. Everyone has their own entitle to say their pieces, it could be anythin'. I don't see anythin' wrong with it.

I do that sometimes, too. :giggle: Oh, well...

I agree Maria. There is not a valid reason why we can't all give our opinion.

I don't see anything in the rules about who dictates what AD members are required to think.
 
Considering the searches recovered from the family computer on subjects like how to break necks, it is my opinion she meant to do way more than just knock the child out and party.

Children of that age are difficult to cope with and it is a very stressful time.


Care to explain how ? Caylee was only 3 years old little girl and she looked soo happy and angelic face. Her face was radianted on a picture. :aw:
 
Care to explain how ? Caylee was only 3 years old little girl and she looked soo happy and angelic face. Her face was radianted on a picture. :aww:

Terrible twos. It is a rough developmental patch, and quite notorious for stress.

It starts before age two and goes past age two.
 
Considering the searches recovered from the family computer on subjects like how to break necks, it is my opinion she meant to do way more than just knock the child out and party.

Children of that age are difficult to cope with and it is a very stressful time.

according to the police, they never found evidence of google searches as to how to "break necks."
 
It's perfectly normal to share your thoughts what you feel about the mother/or an individual. Everyone has their own entitle to say their pieces, it could be anythin'. I don't see anythin' wrong with it.

I do that sometimes, too. :giggle: Oh, well...

Yeah exactly it's normal and very common ;)
 
according to the police, they never found evidence of google searches as to how to "break necks."

|Someone performed Internet searches for "neck breaking" and "household weapons" on the home computer of a Florida mother charged with killing her missing 3-year-old daughter, according to court documents released Wednesday.

Neck Breaking Search Found on Anthony Computer | theledger.com | The Ledger | Lakeland, FL

Here is a quote from the paper about court documents and a link to source.

At least do your research before making statements!
 
can we just talk about the topic caylee's murder


lets not turn the topic into a bickering match...
 
Come on you guys, Let's please have a civilized discussion and remain on the topic because if this bickering is going to continue, I will have no choice but to close this thread.

Thanks.
 
Back
Top