What gray area are you referring to?
If a child cries and resists wearing a HA or CI for months, does the parent have the right to insist on continuing it?
What gray area are you referring to?
First and foremost you must be sure that nothing else is going on with the device. If you have done that, just keep putting it on. Use rewards, stickers, charts, games, etc.
What is too far? Anything that includes physical or emotional coercion.
Alright... Are you sure there isnt another reason for that? What is the underlying issue?
When I have my daughter and any issues appear - I find out the source issue and we're merry. Matter of a fact - I can only remember a VERY few times that my daughter was "SCREAMING and crying." Very few. It almost never happens.
It pains me to hear about another kids screaming and crying.
If a child cries and resists wearing a HA or CI for months, does the parent have the right to insist on continuing it?
Isnt rewarding emotional coercion?
faire_jour said:Beowulf said:All right, I'll bite. Are you implying that she is fervently against anything you do since you made her wear a CI? If so, that ought to tell you something.
No, I mean when she was 2. She hated shoes, so I should have just let her go barefoot? No, parents need to be parents and make sure their child wears shoes.
No, the choice is still their's. It isn't "I won't love you if you don't", they have to want the reward for it to work.
The point is that removing a sock and taking off an HA does not necessarily indicate pain! It's what toddlers do.
And yes, that's what we have been saying from the start: she must find out if the map is wrong and causing discomfort! Doing so is not child abuse.
I've seen too many parents who pull that card with their kids. Even the ones who don't want to wear the CI's..
So, tell me, if your kid is 13 and tells you they refuse to wear the CI's and refuse to work with the oral side of their education - what will you do?
If the child goes for a period of time without the CI....say a week, the MAP is no longer appropriate. They have to go back to the audiologist, reset the MAP, probably have to get several MAPs and slowly have to work back up to the optimum MAP. That could take weeks, and then the child is missing out on weeks worth of input and language, not to mention having to readjust to hearing again, wearing the device again, and all of that. What good does that do?
And this child was not breaking his device, just taking it off. And yes, people were saying that if he was taking it off, that means he hates it and he should be allowed to never wear it again.
Wirelessly posted
Why not. I do sometimes? (I am a barefooted gal) But it will hurt my feetif I don't wear shoes. But really. I never had to fight my son over these things. he knows his feet would hurt if he doesn't wear shoes so he never fought me over it.
At 13, they would be fully involved in that decision, but not at 3.
I have not ever uttered child abuse.
And finding out if there's a problem with a CI that's causing it to hurt (as you said) is exactly what I've been saying but this keeps getting argued and compared to socks and shoes.
I'm done here. So very ridiculous.
So you're saying you're perfectly fine with all kinds of treatment into making the child wear the CI for months at end at 3?
faire_jour said:Wirelessly posted
Why not. I do sometimes? (I am a barefooted gal) But it will hurt my feetif I don't wear shoes. But really. I never had to fight my son over these things. he knows his feet would hurt if he doesn't wear shoes so he never fought me over it.
Because 6 months out of the year there is snow on the ground.
Because 6 months out of the year there is snow on the ground.
No, in fact, I specifically told you that there were good ways and inappropriate ways to deal with it.
Wirelessly posted
Believe me...a child would want shoes!
Okay, and wheres the line?Even after right mapping, right rewarding programs,, etc and the kid still rejects.. WHAT DO YOU DO?