Once again, making assumptions. I have never said the ASL route is for everyone, nor have I ever said that parents should not implant their children. What I have said is that when parents have im-lanted their children they need to understand that the child is still deaf, and should be exposed to sign as sell as spoken language. It is not the fact that cloggy has implanted his child that makes me respond harshly--it is the fact that cloggy has implanted his child and now insists that his child is hearing. As a counselor, I see the results of this attitude on a daily basis on kids and young adults; as a PhD. candidate working in a college environment, I see the negative effects of that attitude on children educationally.
Your child, even though implanted, is exposed to the deaf community and signing. Therefore, your child is being offered already the advantages that I porpose are necessary for deaf children of hearing parents to grow into successful, well adjusted, well educated adults.
I'm sorry if you find me arrogant, but arrogance and assertiveness are two of the qualities that are necessary when advocating for my deaf students. Without it, they are left to flounder around in the educational system without all of the services they need simply because it is easier not to provide services and unless someone puts up a fight, they will not be provided on the assumption that hte student did not ask for them. But students are coming into college without the proper transition services, are not aware of what they ar3e entitled to or how to obtain the services, or what procedure to follow if they are not provided services in a timely manner. And several of these students are CI students who were provided no more than a notetaker throughout high school, because their parents, who insisted that they function orally, signed off on an IEP that directed that the student was to receive minimal services. Now these students arrive at college, thinking that as they have been pushed through the public school system, subjected to different standards than their hearing peers, and pretty much been allowed to make reading errors and grammar errors that are forgiven rather than attended to with support services, and they believe that becasue they have a high school diploma they are ready for college level work. I have yet to meet one in my area that did not need remedial services. They need to take remedial courses not because they are less intelligent than the hearing studnets, and not because they are less capable than the hearing students, but because they have not been provided the services they need in order to excell at the same rate as the hearing students. I find this an unacceptable injustice for these deaf students. If you find that situation acceptable, then yes, we disagree.
I have never held myself up as an expert on Deaf culture. As a matter of fact, I have stated numerous times that I have a strong understanding an empathy, but do not know what it is to live as a deaf adult. However, the fact that I have been involved directly in Deaf culture for a nuimber of years, and have taken time to really listen to what I am told about the experiences of the people I have come into contact with, and deal with their problems on a daily basis as a counselor, I do have more of an understanding than a hearing person who has not had the same experience. But in the end, Deaf individuals are the experts, and they are the ones I look to for guidance in my understanding.
If you feel that I have bashed you in this reply, then I am sorry that you perceive it that way. I see it simply as an explanation, as you obviously have made some errors in judgement of who I am and what I do, not to mention what I believe and advocate for.