When Gas hits $4 a Gallon ill bet you the media wouldnt criticize Obama

Status
Not open for further replies.
DeafCaroline said:
Steve, you need to study economics. Price of oil always goes up when there is uncertainty about the country supplying the oil. It went up when the war on Iraq was launched, it went up again when the war on Libya began and now that Iran appears t be threatening Israel and cutting off the strait whereby their oil is shipped, it's going to go up again. As soon as I heard about Iran/Israel in the news, I knew the price of gas will go up over $4.

How I knew? I studied economics.

Bush STARTED a war with Iraq - a 10 year war. He is why the price of gas went up. Obama didn't start any at all. Why do you think he should be blamed for the price of gas going over $4?
Click to expand...


Why? Maybe because he is doing nothing about Iran.
Remember Clinton did nothing and gave us WTC.
 
rolling7 said:
Why? Maybe because he is doing nothing about Iran.
Remember Clinton did nothing and gave us WTC.
Click to expand...

WTC happened under Bush's watch. nice try.
 
rolling7 said:
Why? Maybe because he is doing nothing about Iran.
Remember Clinton did nothing and gave us WTC.
Click to expand...

And Clinton had an oppitunity to get Bin Laden. But he failed to do his job because he wanted to help Al Gore get elected

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-abVp-261s]A Path to 9/11 Scene Unedited - YouTube[/ame]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNoN403tXU4]Bill Clinton's Chris Wallace Interview - YouTube[/ame]

Thats the truth!
 
Jiro said:
WTC happened under Bush's watch. nice try.
Click to expand...

Nice try yourself. And the sleeper cells were planted when? And the planning was was done when? That is right.....right under Clinton's nose.
And why? Because Clinton cut off funding to the C.I.A, F.B.I and the Arm Force special service units.
 
DeafCaroline said:
What is Obama supposed to be doing exactly with Iran?
Click to expand...

You think maybe he could do something about Iran building an offensive nuclear bomb?
GAY (getting ahead of you)...yes, America has many nuclear bombs but we have no intention of using them for offensive purpose.
GAY 2....the atom bomb dropped on Japan was for defensive purpose. You can't have it both ways. If you state that Bush started a war with Iraq, then you have to admit Japan started a war with America.
 
rolling7 said:
You think maybe he could do something about Iran building an offensive nuclear bomb?
GAY (getting ahead of you)...yes, America has many nuclear bombs but we have no intention of using them for offensive purpose.
GAY 2....the atom bomb dropped on Japan was for defensive purpose. You can't have it both ways. If you state that Bush started a war with Iraq, then you have to admit Japan started a war with America.
Click to expand...

Read the news.
 
There is a bunch of it, so I don't know for sure which news your are referring to....link please
 
There is NO Nuclear Bomb in IRAN. Just like Bush thought WMDs in IRAQ when Saddam had none. What makes you think IRAN has the Bomb? Ever heard the expression cross that bridge when it comes to that? When IRAN test a Nuke successfuly then we can worry about it.
 
rolling7 said:
Nice try yourself. And the sleeper cells were planted when? And the planning was was done when? That is right.....right under Clinton's nose.
And why? Because Clinton cut off funding to the C.I.A, F.B.I and the Arm Force special service units.
Click to expand...

and Bush had plenty of time to take care of this when he came into office.
 
SteveMcGarrett said:
There is NO Nuclear Bomb in IRAN. Just like Bush thought WMDs in IRAQ when Saddam had none. What makes you think IRAN has the Bomb? Ever heard the expression cross that bridge when it comes to that? When IRAN test a Nuke successfuly then we can worry about it.
Click to expand...

worry about what? Pakistan has nuke. North Korea has nuke. did anything happen? nope.

you know why I'm not worried? because they'll just end up bankrupting themselves and I lol'ed. this is the best and cheapest way to win the war.
 
Jiro said:
worry what? Pakistan has nuke. North Korea has nuke. did anything happen? nope.
Click to expand...

Blame Clinton when Allbright was being so nice to Kim Jung. Thats how Liberals deal with tyrants,
BE NICE TO THEM!!! BE NICE TO THEM!!!
 
SteveMcGarrett said:
And Clinton had an oppitunity to get Bin Laden. But he failed to do his job because he wanted to help Al Gore get elected

A Path to 9/11 Scene Unedited - YouTube

Bill Clinton's Chris Wallace Interview - YouTube

Thats the truth!
Click to expand...

did you even watch it?

read the transcript.

FULL TRANSCRIPT: Clinton Takes On Fox News | ThinkProgress
CLINTON: No, no. I authorized the CIA to get groups together to try to kill him.

The CIA, which was run by George Tenet, that President Bush gave the Medal of Freedom to, he said, He did a good job setting up all these counterterrorism things.

The country never had a comprehensive anti-terror operation until I came there.

Now, if you want to criticize me for one thing, you can criticize me for this: After the Cole, I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban, and launch a full-scale attack search for bin Laden.

But we needed basing rights in Uzbekistan, which we got after 9/11.

The CIA and the FBI refused to certify that bin Laden was responsible while I was there. They refused to certify. So that meant I would’ve had to send a few hundred Special Forces in in helicopters and refuel at night.

Even the 9/11 Commission didn’t do that. Now, the 9/11 Commission was a political document, too. All I’m asking is, anybody who wants to say I didn’t do enough, you read Richard Clarke’s book.
Click to expand...

CLINTON: What did I do? What did I do? I worked hard to try to kill him. I authorized a finding for the CIA to kill him. We contracted with people to kill him. I got closer to killing him than anybody has gotten since. And if I were still president, we’d have more than 20,000 troops there trying to kill him.
Now, I’ve never criticized President Bush, and I don’t think this is useful. But you know we do have a government that thinks Afghanistan is only one-seventh as important as Iraq.

And you ask me about terror and Al Qaida with that sort of dismissive thing? When all you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s book to look at what we did in a comprehensive, systematic way to try to protect the country against terror.
And you’ve got that little smirk on your face and you think you’re so clever. But I had responsibility for trying to protect this country. I tried and I failed to get bin Laden. I regret it. But I did try. And I did everything I thought I responsibly could.

The entire military was against sending Special Forces in to Afghanistan and refueling by helicopter. And no one thought we could do it otherwise, because we could not get the CIA and the FBI to certify that Al Qaida was responsible while I was president.

And so, I left office. And yet, I get asked about this all the time. They had three times as much time to deal with it, and nobody ever asks them about it. I think that’s strange.
Click to expand...

and the worst part? and possibly the most suspicious part?
CLINTON: All right. Let’s look at what Richard Clarke said. Do you think Richard Clarke has a vigorous attitude about bin Laden?

WALLACE: Yes, I do.

CLINTON: You do, don’t you?

WALLACE: I think he has a variety of opinions and loyalties, but yes, he has a vigorous…

CLINTON: He has a variety of opinion and loyalties now, but let’s look at the facts: He worked for Ronald Reagan; he was loyal to him. He worked for George H. W. Bush; he was loyal to him. He worked for me, and he was loyal to me. He worked for President Bush; he was loyal to him.

They downgraded him and the terrorist operation.

Now, look what he said, read his book and read his factual assertions — not opinions — assertions. He said we took vigorous action after the African embassies. We probably nearly got bin Laden.
Click to expand...

why is it that under Bush Administration, a handful of reputable, prominent Patriots like Colin Powell, Valerie Plame, Joseph Wilson, and few generals were scrapped away? very suspicious.

I don't think I've ever seen this amount of treasons and criminality in one administration before. Watergate Scandal doesn't even come close to it. What a shame...
 
SteveMcGarrett said:
Blame Clinton when Allbright was being so nice to Kim Jung. Thats how Liberals deal with tyrants,
BE NICE TO THEM!!! BE NICE TO THEM!!!
Click to expand...

so.... what did North Korea do to us? and what would you prefer? another Korean War?
 
Jiro said:
so.... what did North Korea do to us? and what would you prefer? another Korean War?
Click to expand...
Actually, the Korean War isn't over yet. We're just in a cease fire.
 
Jiro said:
did you even watch it?

read the transcript.

FULL TRANSCRIPT: Clinton Takes On Fox News | ThinkProgress




and the worst part? and possibly the most suspicious part?


why is it that under Bush Administration, a handful of reputable, prominent Patriots like Colin Powell, Valerie Plame, Joseph Wilson, and few generals were scrapped away? very suspicious.

I don't think I've ever seen this amount of treasons and criminality in one administration before. Watergate Scandal doesn't even come close to it. What a shame...
Click to expand...

Did you watch the Path to 9-11? Why did ABC TV give in to Bill Clinton and Edited that scene? Maybe Clinton has something to hide?
 
SteveMcGarrett said:
Did you watch the Path to 9-11? Why did ABC TV give in to Bill Clinton and Edited that scene? Maybe Clinton has something to hide?
Click to expand...

not interested in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. let's focus on facts.
 
Jiro said:
and Bush had plenty of time to take care of this when he came into office.
Click to expand...

IYO !

IMO nine months is enough time to have a baby, not enough time to root out sleeper cells and stop WTC. These sleeper cells became deeply imbedded under Clinton.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top