- Joined
- Nov 21, 2013
- Messages
- 12,688
- Reaction score
- 1
This most recent posts gave me some
Sorry. Blame it on me for poor choice of words.
This most recent posts gave me some
IMO--NCIS on TV is interesting but not real life. The original NCIS is closer to reality than the NCIS Los Angeles program. The LA show has totally jumped the shark.You sure about that? TV shows tend to take great liberties and do not always show the "REAL" goings on of whatever they are portraying. I have read stories where it is said that events/procedures on the old ER show were not always accurate or true.
So-- same with NCIS (and NCIS:Los Angeles)- while the premise is true in what they do... the story lines are not. I will only believe it if I am talking to somebody who has actually oh- WORKED there or is very familiar with it (like Reba and TinSailor) or I've actually been there and seen it with my own two lil eyes.
I'll make it even easier, and I'm not an actor (though I have been in a play).Quite sure. It's true that the storyline isn't based on true events, but I'm an actor-- I'm trained to know what is true and what's not.
Very nice.For those of you wondering, I was in this production, in 2010. That year, three deaf people joined for the 1st time EVER, led by me.
Mentally ill share stories through theatre group | abc30.com
I was the first to join, and not long after, two others did.
Do you mean two survived but one is in prison? That is, one person died, correct?One note-- of the three in the video-- only one survived. One passed away, the other is a felon, currently in prison.
What do you mean by "here?" Chicago? On earth? Alive? That's not clear.Yep. Only I'm still here. *knocks on wood*
Do you mean two survived but one is in prison? That is, one person died, correct?
Do you mean two survived but one is in prison? That is, one person died, correct?
Unless you're a member of the justice system I doubt there are any confidentiality restrictions on you.Then you know I can't disclose his crimes without compromising his safety. It's called Scott's Law.
Unless this guy is in a federal relocation program with a new identity, his identity and crime are public record. The only records that would be redacted or inaccessible would be concerning the victims.No, but the last time I heard from him, he, shall I say, isn't doing great. There are rules in place pertaining these types of offenders, and I'm required to follow them, and that means I cannot say exactly what he did without violating federal law, and putting him and possibly his family at risk. Now, I'm not even sure where he is now, and I really don't want to, either.
Do you mean two survived but one is in prison? That is, one person died, correct?
Nope.Megan's Law. Dumb me.
Nope. Try again.Yes. That law specifically says no harm can come to sex offenders and family. That's why I can't disclose the specific kinds of crime he did-- I would be violating that law.
True. However, not many know this-- if a sex offender lives in your neighborhood, those people cannot threaten harm or safety. That is what that part of the law is intended to do-- it gives offenders the right to be safe from harm.
Nope.
Megan's Law was passed to protect the children, not the pedophile offenders.
Megan's Law makes the personal information about sex offenders more public and accessible, not less.
That's the opposite of what you stated.