Vicious hate crime attack on white 16-year old boy

yizuman said:
You didn't answer my question.

Is it not racist for a black man to beat up a white man just simply because he's white?

Yiz
Click to expand...

it is if the black man screamed racist stuff. but in this case..... there's no proof.
 
yizuman said:
You didn't answer my question.

Is it not racist for a black man to beat up a white man just simply because he's white?

Yiz
Click to expand...
Thought I did, but will address it this way:

If a black man beats a white man because he is white, it is racist. If a black man beats a white man because he spilled his drink, it is not racist. If a white man beats a black man because he is black, it is racist. If a white man beats a black man because he spilled his drink, it is not racist.
 
saywhatkid said:
No need for me to jump to conclusions; the "article" stated that the suspects were a black male and a Filipino male. A white on white crime would not be racist. It could be based on religion. Same as black on black, etc. This thread was created to show a racist hate crime was committed against a white person, or it (white) would not be included in the title.

Personal grudge? I think it comes with the territory. I have never said I liked you. I try to show respect, even though debates with you follow the same pattern: me saying what I feel; you pasting blogs, editorials, and links to support "your" side, or asking rhetorical questions to avoid giving answers. You can shout to the world that you respect me, but I am not buying your brand. I remember all of your whining about posters having to use personal attacks because they had no debating skills. And yet, here we are...
Click to expand...

Um, we don't know if a hate crime has truly been committed. But if the accounts were true based on the description in the article then surely we can assume that. Which is why I noticed how people avoided discussing that specifically (hate crime against a white person) and instead attacked the victim.

As for the personal grudge, you continue to complain about me through my OP threads. I don't do that here but you do. Like I said, let...it...go, dude. I don't know what it is you have over me but let it go before you get an aneurysm or something. You're bringing this one up, not me. Remember that.

What I said is that it's easier to do ad hominem attacks than to debate. Focus on the argument, not the person, as I have said repeatedly in AD and elsewhere. Anybody can do ad hominems but debating or arguing effectively is another matter. Not quite the same thing as "whining." Nice try but it isn't the same thing.
 
kokonut said:
Keep twisting. Nice going, dude.
Click to expand...

kokonut said:
Not even close. Unwind that spincter of yours.
Click to expand...

kokonut said:
A bit of a diversion here on your part, I see.

Again, nice going.
Click to expand...

kokonut said:
Personal grudge? Let it go, man. Let...it....go....
Click to expand...

kokonut said:
As for the personal grudge, you continue to complain about me through my OP threads. I don't do that here but you do. Like I said, let...it...go, dude. I don't know what it is you have over me but let it go before you get an aneurysm or something. You're bringing this one up, not me. Remember that.

What I said is that it's easier to do ad hominem attacks than to debate. Focus on the argument, not the person, as I have said repeatedly in AD and elsewhere. Anybody can do ad hominems but debating or arguing effectively is another matter. Not quite the same thing as "whining." Nice try but it isn't the same thing.
Click to expand...
OK. Got it.
 
Hmmm...interesting comment by Rush:

"Were this a white-on-black hate crime," said Rush, "there is no escaping the fact that it would be national news for months, and every prominent black career civil rights activist in America would be calling for the death penalty."
.
.
.
"Certainly, this crime is no more or less heinous than would be a white-on-black hate crime," said Rush, who was the first to expose nationally the anti-American sermons of President Obama's longtime pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. "But I am interested to see what the judicial system in liberal Seattle and the establishment press make of this. So far, the latter has said next to nothing."

As Rush recently said in an interview with Family Security Matters, "The Left has pretty much got the reins on the press, and a lot of the news bureau chiefs and the journalists are likeminded people who went to a lot of the same universities, they were schooled in hard Left journalism. They really have lost that concern for what the truth is."
.
.
.
"Hopefully," said Rush, "this case can be equitably adjudicated in Washington state, because it is a matter of public record that the Obama Justice Department has a directive to dismiss black-on-white civil rights violations."
Click to expand...

'Hate crime' charges filed over heinous attack

:hmm:

Read carefully now....
 
I agree with what Rush said:

The incident occurred May 25 but only made headlines after recent police arrests, charging Mohamed and Baquiring with a hate crime. Even still, media coverage remains limited mostly to Seattle, something Rush said he finds "both baffling and revealing."
Click to expand...
 
kokonut said:
Proves that you didn't even read the article. Limbaugh's last name isn't Rush.
Click to expand...

You called him Rush. And of COURSE I didn't read the article. He is simply a hatemonger, so why would I taint my mind with his nonsense? :lol:
 
Beowulf said:
You called him Rush. And of COURSE I didn't read the article. He is simply a hatemonger, so why would I taint my mind with his nonsense? :lol:
Click to expand...

Ahem, Limbaugh's last name isn't Rush.

:giggle:

You still don't get it.
 
kokonut said:
Ahem, Limbaugh's last name isn't Rush.

:giggle:

You still don't get it.
Click to expand...

This is getting to be fun. I was replying to your statement in which YOU said you agree with RUSH, in whom the article said he found the lack of more media coverage of the arrest "baffling and revealing." Better check your own words.
 
Beowulf said:
This is getting to be fun. I was replying to your statement in which YOU said you agree with RUSH, in whom the article said he found the lack of more media coverage of the arrest "baffling and revealing." Better check your own words.
Click to expand...

There is no Rush Limbaugh in that article. :wave:
 
Back
Top