U.S. ends criminal probe of controversial Arizona sheriff

Status
Not open for further replies.

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
PHOENIX (Reuters) - Two tough-on-immigration Arizona sheriffs with national profiles in the Republican Party were cleared of criminal wrongdoing on Friday in unrelated probes, though one remains accused of racial profiling and other abuses in a pair of federal lawsuits.

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona said it had closed its criminal investigation of alleged financial misconduct by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, self-described as "America's toughest sheriff", and was declining to bring charges.

But a separate U.S. Justice Department investigation and lawsuit relating to alleged civil rights abuses by Arpaio's office, including accusations of widespread racial profiling in his immigration enforcement, is continuing, federal prosecutors said.

And a federal judge is expected to rule soon in a similar suit brought against Arpaio, this one a class-action case by five Hispanic citizens who claimed they were stopped by the sheriff's deputies because of their ethnicity.

Earlier on Friday, another Arizona lawman with national ties to the Republican Party and a reputation for cracking down on illegal border crossings, Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, was cleared of criminal charges by the state attorney general's office.

Babeu resigned as co-chair of Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's state campaign after allegations he threatened a male lover with deportation but asked for the state investigation of his conduct to clear his name.

Babeu acknowledged at the time he was gay and had a personal relationship with his accuser, Jose Orozco, who was reported to be from Mexico, but denied that he had made any threat to deport him.

"The Attorney General's Office will not file charges against either Babeu or Orozco," Solicitor General Dave Cole said in a statement.

"The investigation determined that Babeu did not commit any criminal violations and further concluded that, although Orozco conducted himself in a manner that may constitute a violation of the law, there was no reasonable likelihood of conviction or anything more than a misdemeanor charge," Cole added.

Babeu said in a statement that "the truth had won out in the end", and that he had been fully exonerated.

The decision on the Arpaio case marked the end of an investigation that began in November 2010 at the behest of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to examine alleged financial improprieties by the county sheriff and his deputies.

A criminal inquiry into several of those matters was concluded last summer with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Arizona declining to initiate charges.

'MY PEOPLE ARE NOT CROOKS'

Maricopa County authorities were informed on Friday that federal prosecutors had likewise declined to bring charges in connection with two remaining allegations against the sheriff's office - that it had misused county credit cards and misspent jail-enhancement excise taxes.

In addition, the U.S. Attorney's Office declined to prosecute two former officials of the county attorney's office who were accused of wrongfully prosecuting a local judge.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Birmingham Scheel said in a statement that her office "is closing its investigation into allegations of criminal conduct by current and former members of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and the Maricopa County Attorney's Office".

In a four-page letter to the county attorney elaborating on her decision, Scheel wrote: "After careful review, we do not believe the allegations presented to us are prosecutable as crimes."

Arpaio said he learned the case was dropped on his return to Arizona from the Republican National Convention in Florida.

"I said all along I would be cleared in this case," Arpaio, looking tired, told reporters gathered at his office in downtown Phoenix late Friday. "If I did something wrong, there would be indictments floating around all over the place."

He added: "My people are not crooks. They are trying to do their job."

Arpaio, 80, who is seeking re-election to a sixth term as sheriff in November, has ignited controversy over his aggressive enforcement of immigration laws and his politically charged, and fruitless, pursuit of evidence questioning the validity of President Barack Obama's U.S. birth certificate.

He has been under a federal investigation since 2008 over allegations that he and his deputies engaged in an extensive pattern of civil rights abuses. That probe led the Justice Department to file a lawsuit in May accusing the sheriff and his office of racial profiling and unlawful arrests of Latinos in a bid to crack down on illegal immigration.

The civil suit also accused Arpaio's office of routinely violating the constitutional free-speech rights of political opponents by retaliating against them through unsubstantiated legal action, including unlawful arrests.

A separate lawsuit accusing Arpaio and his deputies of racial profiling went to trial earlier this summer, with the sheriff denying under oath that his office ever arrested people "because of the color of their skin".

U.S. ends criminal probe of controversial Arizona sheriff - Yahoo! News
 
Good for Sheriff Joe! What a huge waste of taxpayers dollars investigating someone that upholds the law and punishes the wrongdoers! This is how other states should fight crime!
 
But a separate U.S. Justice Department investigation and lawsuit relating to alleged civil rights abuses by Arpaio's office, including accusations of widespread racial profiling in his immigration enforcement, is continuing, federal prosecutors said.

And a federal judge is expected to rule soon in a similar suit brought against Arpaio, this one a class-action case by five Hispanic citizens who claimed they were stopped by the sheriff's deputies because of their ethnicity.

Joe Arpaio still have federal lawsuit to left, especially on civil rights violation.

I never liked him and I hope that he will be gone soon. I just want corrupted law enforcement officers to be gone, that all I care.
 
Also, I feel bad for latino people who got arrested due to immigration status or lack of document and didn't break any laws, beside of immigration. I don't blame on them for cross illegally, especially they wants job and not intend to break any laws.

Our immigration law is very flawed and need to seriously addressed. I don't know why no one want to address since immigration issue has been started in 30 or 40 years ago. I just want educated, law abiding and clean background to be admitted instead of get denied. My best friend's cousin applied for immigrate to US since 1980's but got denied, even he has college education and his background is very clean.

The immigration would have to depends on job availability and I found out about there are people are less likely to enter our country illegally due to condition of economic. Only immigrants who want enter illegally during poor economic, to break any laws - harm to our citizens, of course. If we don't have much job availability so we have to suspend or severe cut on immigrants.
 
Also, I feel bad for latino people who got arrested due to immigration status or lack of document and didn't break any laws, beside of immigration. I don't blame on them for cross illegally, especially they wants job and not intend to break any laws.

Our immigration law is very flawed and need to seriously addressed. I don't know why no one want to address since immigration issue has been started in 30 or 40 years ago. I just want educated, law abiding and clean background to be admitted instead of get denied. My best friend's cousin applied for immigrate to US since 1980's but got denied, even he has college education and his background is very clean.

The immigration would have to depends on job availability and I found out about there are people are less likely to enter our country illegally due to condition of economic. Only immigrants who want enter illegally during poor economic, to break any laws - harm to our citizens, of course. If we don't have much job availability so we have to suspend or severe cut on immigrants.

Entering illegally proves a willingness to commit crime. How would one check the background of someone entering illegally?
 
Entering illegally proves a willingness to commit crime. How would one check the background of someone entering illegally?

In bold, I'm disagree with you and not all illegal immigrants are criminal. I went to school with a lot of students who from illegal immigrants and they said that their parent enter illegally because they need job since they didn't find anything is good in Mexico and Central America.

Some companies willing to hire illegal immigrants on risk without run all background check.
 
No, he talked bullshit. He made it up. He said that anyone who enters illegally is planning to commit a crime. WTF?
Committing illegal acts (entering a country illegally, falsifying papers, stealing SSN's and ID's, lying) proves a general disrespect of the law.
 
Committing illegal acts (entering a country illegally, falsifying papers, stealing SSN's and ID's, lying) proves a general disrespect of the law.

And I see nothing wrong with Sheriff Joe arresting someone committing "illegal acts". putting them into jail....and having to wear "Pink Underwear and Ballerina Shoes"......:giggle:
 
Committing illegal acts (entering a country illegally, falsifying papers, stealing SSN's and ID's, lying) proves a general disrespect of the law.

Illegal immigrants (known as undocumented immigrants) and illegal acts are very different.
 
Committing illegal acts (entering a country illegally, falsifying papers, stealing SSN's and ID's, lying) proves a general disrespect of the law.
Oh, entering illegally is a crime itself. I thought TXgolfer meant that illegal immigrants plan a crime like breaking in, robbing, etc which is not always true.
 
And I see nothing wrong with Sheriff Joe arresting someone committing "illegal acts". putting them into jail....and having to wear "Pink Underwear and Ballerina Shoes"......:giggle:

Sheriff Joe is an idiot.

You and other voters are too lazy because you haven't push on lawmakers to fix the flaws in immigration law in few decades ago.

Not all undocumented immigrants commit illegal act, other than their immigration status.
 
Illegal immigrants (known as undocumented immigrants) and illegal acts are very different.
Entering or staying in the USA illegally is an illegal act.

They are illegal aliens, not immigrants.

"Undocumented" makes it seem like they just left their papers on the kitchen table before leaving home. That's not the case. They either snuck into the country without permission, or they overstayed a permitted visit. In either case, they broke the law. Breaking the law is an illegal act.
 
Oh, entering illegally is a crime itself. I thought TXgolfer meant that illegal immigrants plan a crime like breaking in, robbing, etc which is not always true.
However, one illegal act usually leads to another.

After entering the country illegally, the person usually needs identification and and SSN in order to work. So, they get fake ID's and steal someone else's SSN. It also means they lie to officials when their status is questioned. They also have to give false information on official documents for driver's licenses, school admissions, job applications, etc. It's a chain reaction.
 
Entering or staying in the USA illegally is an illegal act.

They are illegal aliens, not immigrants.

"Undocumented" makes it seem like they just left their papers on the kitchen table before leaving home. That's not the case. They either snuck into the country without permission, or they overstayed a permitted visit. In either case, they broke the law. Breaking the law is an illegal act.

First paragraph, yes, enter USA illegally is violation of immigration law.

My point is not all undocumented immigrants are criminal OTHER THAN IMMIGRATION STATUS and they want to get better job that they found none in their country.

I have disagree with your vocabulary and I met students that come from parent who are undocumented immigrants so they prefer to call undocumented immigrants rather than illegal immigrants or illegal aliens.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top