Trust

[CutePommie]

Yes i went like that when i open this AD forum... Sigh !! it getting old.

 

[Roadrunner]

I hope not, but it's possible. He's proven he's capable of threatening to kill someone, so why not make good of his threat now and do it?

That is truly a frightening thought.

Not as frightening as to know such ppls. like you and a few others happened to always follow or post along with another member that is also no longer here...why did I say that? Apparently 'this' other member is seemingly worse than the other whom you keep babbling about over and over (but I will not bring in the details of that in the open Forum)...let the authorities deal with that situation, why keep bringing it in here...seems like you like to stir up emotions as much as being a critic...I'm getting a bit leery of your ways here in AD, instead...why not post something more constructive and positive instead of bringing in the usual banter and bickering? Obviously it's not helping--

Also, I've noticed another 'twisted' statement that isn't true, as for 'B', member was only banned permanently 'once', not twice as it's being stated here and there throughout AD. Apparently, that 'trust' which is believing what one or two members stated which happens to be false. Hmmm....

Of course, I don't condone the actions 'B' may be accused of, but then again, I don't fall to supposedly evidence that consists of 'emails', 'pm's' or 'im's'--anyone in their right mind knows well enough that these things can be altered. Despite any other credible evidence that may be out there, let the authorities handle that. It's my understanding that there is a great many other members here in AD that's tired of seeing and reading about 'B' and what others are saying or incorporating within their posts. It's pulling AD apart and we don't need that.

As for 'sweeping' certain things under a rug...think all you want, assume all you want, frankly, you don't have a friggin' clue what it takes to moderate, to be fair for 'all' members. Many things that the Mod Team or Administrator do, we do so for good reasons...the least is to satisfy only one or two ppls. (-not-), of course, some of our decisions isn't readily accepted and welcomed from time to time, but we do so greatly for the overall benefit for Alldeaf...it's sad enough to see a new member recently coming in here and thinking that there's too much drama, such drama created by folks like yourself--frankly, I'm getting a bit tired of it and have been quiet for some time--but, enough is enough!!!

As for 'trust'...either learn to accept to trust the Mod Team/Administrator OR get out! All there is to it.


Peace.


~RR

 

[Angel]

Not as frightening as to know such ppls. like you and a few others happened to always follow or post along with another member that is also no longer here...why did I say that? Apparently 'this' other member is seemingly worse than the other whom you keep babbling about over and over (but I will not bring in the details of that in the open Forum)...let the authorities deal with that situation, why keep bringing it in here...seems like you like to stir up emotions as much as being a critic...I'm getting a bit leery of your ways here in AD, instead...why not post something more constructive and positive instead of bringing in the usual banter and bickering? Obviously it's not helping--

Also, I've noticed another 'twisted' statement that isn't true, as for 'B', member was only banned permanently 'once', not twice as it's being stated here and there throughout AD. Apparently, that 'trust' which is believing what one or two members stated which happens to be false. Hmmm....

Of course, I don't condone the actions 'B' may be accused of, but then again, I don't fall to supposedly evidence that consists of 'emails', 'pm's' or 'im's'--anyone in their right mind knows well enough that these things can be altered. Despite any other credible evidence that may be out there, let the authorities handle that. It's my understanding that there is a great many other members here in AD that's tired of seeing and reading about 'B' and what others are saying or incorporating within their posts. It's pulling AD apart and we don't need that.

As for 'sweeping' certain things under a rug...think all you want, assume all you want, frankly, you don't have a friggin' clue what it takes to moderate, to be fair for 'all' members. Many things that the Mod Team or Administrator do, we do so for good reasons...the least is to satisfy only one or two ppls. (-not-), of course, some of our decisions isn't readily accepted and welcomed from time to time, but we do so greatly for the overall benefit for Alldeaf...it's sad enough to see a new member recently coming in here and thinking that there's too much drama, such drama created by folks like yourself--frankly, I'm getting a bit tired of it and have been quiet for some time--but, enough is enough!!!

As for 'trust'...either learn to accept to trust the Mod Team/Administrator OR get out! All there is to it.


Peace.


~RR

Bravo Bravo Roadrunner, you said it ALL!!!! about focking time someone said it!!!


Guys, Please do not take this wrong, but you guys have no focking clue what Roadrunner, I and Alex is going through, first another member here who posted MY personal home address right in the focking public forum which put my three children at risk, and no I did not give him my personal home address but someone else did and second I got a threaten PM of sending a bomb to my home just cause he think I'm a RS lover and on RS 's side, and third he create a picture banner of me, RR and Alex and it's says " We protect sexual predators "...Why all this had to happen to us? simple because he thinks we're on his side, just like you guys in here think the same freaking thing....Simple put, the member is banned and no longer coming back, time to move on before any more innocent members fall into this mess and unneccessary drama just like we've been hit with...

 

[Levonian]

What do you mean “not this shit again”? This subject has never been discussed on this message board, ever. This is the first time that anybody has ever demanded full accountability for what recently happened. Nobody has ever stood up and suggested that the blame for this rests anywhere other than on Steve. Until now. And this thread isn’t really about Steve. We’re just using Steve because he is a perfect example of how the denialist mentality of this board’s administration affects the entire community. In this particular example, it also could have led to serious harm to an innocent minor. So we ask again: how and why was this permitted to occur?

 

[Oceanbreeze]

Bravo Bravo Roadrunner, you said it ALL!!!! about focking time someone said it!!!


Guys, Please do not take this wrong, but you guys have no focking clue what Roadrunner, I and Alex is going through, first another member here who posted MY personal home address right in the focking public forum which put my three children at risk, and no I did not give him my personal home address but someone else did and second I got a threaten PM of sending a bomb to my home just cause he think I'm a RS lover and on RS 's side, and third he create a picture banner of me, RR and Alex and it's says " We protect sexual predators "...Why all this had to happen to us? simple because he thinks we're on his side, just like you guys in here think the same freaking thing....Simple put, the member is banned and no longer coming back, time to move on before any more innocent members fall into this mess and unneccessary drama just like we've been hit with...

What YOU are going through? You brought this on yourselves.

What about that innocent 14 yr old girl who became an unwilling victim of BuckDodgers? Think what she's going through right now. Have you seen HER comments? She feels like she can never come back here now, because of what happened. Some people actually BLAMED her for what happened.

If there are feelings that we don't know about concerning how Buck was handled, please tell us. Because from where I sit, it looks like Buck's behavior was repeatedly condoned. Threads and posts were deleted, for instance. If you don't want something known, it's very simple to just get rid of the thread.

All I'm saying is, from where we sit, things appear mighty suspicious, and we'd like straight answers for once.

 

[Levonian]

Doesn’t anybody besides me find it unsettling that an attractive fourteen-year-old girl was allowed to post on this message board using a real photograph of herself in a sexually suggestive pose as her avatar, while at the same time providing real biographical data about her age and using a salacious screen name? I pray that Anna’s mother doesn’t decide to ‘lawyer up’, but if she does, somebody has some real hard questions to answer.

 

[Awauphi]

lev.. u were not the only one that thought of this. i was the one who wonder why she have a leading on screen name and that can lead to problems with pervert. I dont know. If it was me, being her momma. u can bet that i will be mad as hell for having my own daughter make a screen name like that and talk to perverts? i will ground her for a month!

i think anyone under 18 shouldnt have a screen name like that.. only adults over 18 can do that..

 

[Maria]

It's why I don't support X-rated avatar/signature image. Look what it have done to that young girl thinkin' it was okay to have one in her avatar, just because of others did it, too. We as adults and parents should have known better than that, because we knew there will be young kids comin' in this AD.

So, what are you guys gonna do about it ? Any suggestion to solve ?

 

[Levonian]

So, what are you guys gonna do about it ? Any suggestion to solve ?

How about a little common sense? Anna was a member here for about seven months before the Ravenshit saga went down. Why in all that time didn’t a single member of our crack team of moderators think to PM her and suggest that she exercise a little bit of discretion? When I got bored at three o’clock in the morning and derailed Steve’s stupid bungee-jumping thread, the A-Team was all over it in no time flat. But blatant pervert bait was left to languish here for months on end. You know what the funniest aspect of the whole thing is for me? When I first saw Anna’s profile, I immediately thought that she was an undercover cop fishing for Web pervs. Her profile was so laughable that I figured it couldn’t possibly be real. I thought for sure that no Webmaster in his right mind would be stupid enough to allow something like that, so the only explanation had to be that it was a ruse done with the full knowledge of the board’s administration. Man, I sure called that one wrong.

 

[Cheri]

If parents give their kids or teen general access on the net, the parents are responsible for their own kids or teens actions, Parents are responsible to be teaching their kids and teens the safely of being on line, just like how they teach their kids or teens the safely on the street just as you stay away from strangers on the street, being careful about strangers on the Internet, if anyone uses nasty language that make them uncomfortable, they should not respond, and should never post picture of themselves unless getting parents approval first. I'm with SmileyGin on this one.

CyberRed,

They're not X- rate avatars or signatures, They're PG-13. {Parental Guidance Strongly Cautioned} (Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13)

 

[Oceanbreeze]

Not as frightening as to know such ppls. like you and a few others happened to always follow or post along with another member that is also no longer here...why did I say that? Apparently 'this' other member is seemingly worse than the other whom you keep babbling about over and over (but I will not bring in the details of that in the open Forum)...let the authorities deal with that situation, why keep bringing it in here...seems like you like to stir up emotions as much as being a critic...I'm getting a bit leery of your ways here in AD, instead...why not post something more constructive and positive instead of bringing in the usual banter and bickering? Obviously it's not helping--

Also, I've noticed another 'twisted' statement that isn't true, as for 'B', member was only banned permanently 'once', not twice as it's being stated here and there throughout AD. Apparently, that 'trust' which is believing what one or two members stated which happens to be false. Hmmm....

Of course, I don't condone the actions 'B' may be accused of, but then again, I don't fall to supposedly evidence that consists of 'emails', 'pm's' or 'im's'--anyone in their right mind knows well enough that these things can be altered. Despite any other credible evidence that may be out there, let the authorities handle that. It's my understanding that there is a great many other members here in AD that's tired of seeing and reading about 'B' and what others are saying or incorporating within their posts. It's pulling AD apart and we don't need that.

As for 'sweeping' certain things under a rug...think all you want, assume all you want, frankly, you don't have a friggin' clue what it takes to moderate, to be fair for 'all' members. Many things that the Mod Team or Administrator do, we do so for good reasons...the least is to satisfy only one or two ppls. (-not-), of course, some of our decisions isn't readily accepted and welcomed from time to time, but we do so greatly for the overall benefit for Alldeaf...it's sad enough to see a new member recently coming in here and thinking that there's too much drama, such drama created by folks like yourself--frankly, I'm getting a bit tired of it and have been quiet for some time--but, enough is enough!!!

As for 'trust'...either learn to accept to trust the Mod Team/Administrator OR get out! All there is to it.


Peace.


~RR

You would love for us to leave. If we left, then nobody would be held accountable for Steve being given a chance or chances. It doesn't matter to me if he was given one chance or fifty. The point was and is, he shouldn't have been given ANY chances regardless of what he promised. He made death threats to people, and openly indicated he was willing to do harm to anyone he disagreed with. Doesn't that indicate he has more of a problem to people than just followng forum rules? We're NOT talking about someone who was a compulsive spammer here. We're talking about someone who showed total disregard for the LAW. He didn't think the law applied to him, and he could do what he wanted. He was used to getting away with crimes. Furthermore, he OPENLY bragged about this on the forum. He graduated from petty crime (lifting slim jims) to attempting to solicit a 14 yr old girl. The latter of which could have been PREVENTED had he just been allowed to stay banned.

I have seen this unfold now for nearly 18 mos. Now, its time people explained to us why he was allowed that so called second chance.

 

[Maria]

If parents give their kids or teen general access on the net, the parents are responsible for their own kids or teens actions, Parents are responsible to be teaching their kids and teens the safely of being on line, just like how they teach their kids or teens the safely on the street just as you stay away from strangers on the street, being careful about strangers on the Internet, if anyone uses nasty language that make them uncomfortable, they should not respond, and should never post picture of themselves unless getting parents approval first. I'm with SmileyGin on this one.

CyberRed,

They're not X- rate avatars or signatures, They're PG-13. {Parental Guidance Strongly Cautioned} (Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13)

Ok, Cheri -- Show me what PG-13 avatar is like. I want to be the judge of that for myself and see what it tells me.

 

[Maria]

How about a little common sense? Anna was a member here for about seven months before the Ravenshit saga went down. Why in all that time didn’t a single member of our crack team of moderators think to PM her and suggest that she exercise a little bit of discretion? When I got bored at three o’clock in the morning and derailed Steve’s stupid bungee-jumping thread, the A-Team was all over it in no time flat. But blatant pervert bait was left to languish here for months on end. You know what the funniest aspect of the whole thing is for me? When I first saw Anna’s profile, I immediately thought that she was an undercover cop fishing for Web pervs. Her profile was so laughable that I figured it couldn’t possibly be real. I thought for sure that no Webmaster in his right mind would be stupid enough to allow something like that, so the only explanation had to be that it was a ruse done with the full knowledge of the board’s administration. Man, I sure called that one wrong.

So are you sayin' that Anna wasn't really a kid but, an undercover cop fishin' for Web pervs ? Correct me, if I understand it right.

 

[Levonian]

So are you sayin' that Anna wasn't really a kid but, an undercover cop fishin' for Web pervs ? Correct me, if I understand it right.

No, she’s really a kid. I just thought that she was an undercover cop because I couldn’t believe that any Webmaster would allow a minor to use an avatar and profile like hers.

 

[Cheri]

Ok, Cheri -- Show me what PG-13 avatar is like. I want to be the judge of that for myself and see what it tells me.

That's not your call, that's Alex call, and if he had a problem with any member's avatars or signatures that were inappropriate he would have them removed. Therefore Alex allows PG-13.

 

[Maria]

That's not your call, that's Alex call, and if he had a problem with any member's avatars or signatures that were inappropriate he would have them removed. Therefore Alex allows PG-13.

Who said that Alex allows PG-13 ? What did I say in my previous post ? I said I DON'T support X-rated avatar/signature image. If, you are usin' an avatar that shows a naked belly from the breastline down to the navel before hairline - then, I don't support it, either. Or if, your avatar shows butt that sticks out of the short pants - then, I don't support it, either as well. Or let's say, if it shows some breasts that bounced - I don't support it, too. Gee - where's modesty in nowdays ? You can see why we have soo many sexual predators/sex offenders around. For instance : That man, " B " and even, thou if, some of you don't show X-rated avatars/signature images -- but, still it gives some signals. Givin' him some ideas or feedin' him some ideas. No matter how small the " nake " is.

I don't care, if any one of you think that I am a " close-minded " person. I have a good reason to say so. I care about the young kids. Of course, I would like to see them to visit this AD while there's a clean environment without sendin' a wrong signal. You have to remember that each young kid thinks differently from other young kids and you won't know what a young kid may think.

And, of course that's Alex's call since he is the owner of this site. I am not stupid enough.

 

[Maria]

No, she’s really a kid. I just thought that she was an undercover cop because I couldn’t believe that any Webmaster would allow a minor to use an avatar and profile like hers.

Ah, I understand that now. Thanks for explainin' it clear. Yep, I agree with you and it could happen.

 

[GalaxyAngel]

Trust...

circle.. when you're dot inside my circle... meaning I'm trust you..
Circle.. when you're dot outside of my circle... meaning.. I ain't trust you..

That my fave position..

imitiate voice... The flockers' quote!

 

[Cheri]

Who said that Alex allows PG-13 ? What did I say in my previous post ? I said I DON'T support X-rated avatar/signature image.

I think you are having trouble reading me as much you are having trouble reading Levonian. I am the one who says that Alex allows PG-13. I don't care which you supported, Again for the second time, there is no X -rated in this forum that members would use as an avatar or signature.

 

[Levonian]

[/color]Again for the second time, there is no X -rated in this forum that members would use as an avatar or signature.

If you look real, real, real close you can see a wee-wee in my signature.