AJ
New Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2003
- Messages
- 3,311
- Reaction score
- 0
mld4ds said:
very good movie.
mld4ds said:
C.C.Sinned said:OK now that you posted links. Please back up your opinion. Also how they relate to you opinion...
Throughout the late 19th century racial tension grew throughout the United States. More of this tension was noticeable in the Southern parts of the United States. In the south, people were blaming their financial problems on the newly freed slaves that lived around them. Lynchings were becoming a popular way of resolving some of the anger that whites had in relation to the free blacks.
African-Americans suffered grievously under lynch law. With the close of Reconstruction in the late 1870s, southern whites were determined to end northern and black participation in the region's affairs, and northerners exhibited a growing indifference toward the civil rights of black Americans. Taking its cue from this intersectional white harmony, the federal government abandoned its oversight of constitutional protections. Southern and border states responded with the Jim Crow laws of the 1890s, and white mobs flourished. With blacks barred from voting, public office, and jury service, officials felt no obligation to respect minority interests or safeguard minority lives. In addition to lynchings of individuals, dozens of race riots--with blacks as victims--scarred the national landscape from Wilmington, North Carolina, in 1898 to Tulsa, Oklahoma, in 1921.
C.C.Sinned said:OK now that you posted links. Please back up your opinion. Also how they relate to you opinion...
mld4ds said:
That is after the war. that is racisim. However that is not why the war was fought. Racisim is still around today. I know of many here in the north. There are many Ayrans & Skinheads right here in PAthroughout the United States. More of this tension was noticeable in the Southern parts of the United States.
They are all over the internet. You are just blowing smoke up your own ass. You admit you have not eve read the posts. Yet you have been flaming this thread. It goes to show how narrow minded & opinionated you are...mld4ds said:Show me references and sources then i will read your posts. I am not going to read without sources....
Onlookers sometimes fired rifles and handguns hundreds of times into the corpse while people cheered and children played during the festivities. Pieces of the corpse were taken by onlookers as souvenirs of the event [5]. Such was the case when James Irwin was lynched on January 31, 1930. Irwin was accused of the murder of a white girl in the town of Ocilla, Georgia. Taken into custody by a rampaging mob, his fingers and toes were cut off, his teeth pulled out by pliers and finally he was castrated. It still wasn?t enough. Irwin was then burned alive in front of hundreds of onlookers (Brundage, p. 42). No one was ever punished for this barbaric killing. Black victims were hacked to death, dragged behind cars [6], burned, beaten, whipped, sometimes shot thousands of times, mutilated; the savagery was astonishing. How could ordinary people participate in such brutality?
The answer lies in the psychological processes of persuasion and propaganda. For generations, whites in the South regarded blacks as inferiors, both intellectually and biologically. Of course, this may have been a necessary process in order for whites to justify the enslavement of others. These imbedded feelings were visible on every level of society, even in the most trivial circumstances. In the South, a black man was expected to remove his hat when speaking with a white. A black was always addressed by his first name or some derogatory term and he had almost no legal rights. States like Mississippi and Tennessee effected legislation that specifically omitted or targeted African Americans, depending on their purpose. All this had a demoralizing effect on blacks and made them seem less than human to white society. And worse, this condescension seemed to be officially endorsed by the state. It was easy to mistreat blacks if it could be agreed upon that African Americans were vastly different than whites and not deserving of the same respect. This was a result of a disorganized, yet powerful, campaign of propaganda carried on by white plantation owners and others who had an economic stake in the retention of cheap black labor. It was to their advantage to keep African Americans in their ?place?. In many photos of lynchings at the turn of the century, onlookers and members of the mob can be seen smiling and grinning for the camera. They demonstrate no fear of prosecution or reprisal. They had none.
C.C.Sinned said:They are all over the internet. You are just blowing smoke up your own ass. You admit you have not eve read the posts. Yet you have been flaming this thread. It goes to show how narrow minded & opinionated you are...
C.C.Sinned said:That is after the war. that is racisim. However that is not why the war was fought. Racisim is still around today. I know of many here in the north. There are many Ayrans & Skinheads right here in PA
mld4ds said:Then file a complaint form to Mods...
AJ said:u sound like u want to be kicked out of AD.
u keep saying, oh the mods cant ban me yet.
why dont u file a complaint to the mods
That is the point of this thread. To show that it doesn't stand for racism. That the flag is being draged in the mud out of ignorance. So I Have been pointing out since the begining of this thread. That People need to learn why the war was fought. That ignorant fools took the battle flag of the CSA. The perverted it into something evil. If you read the posts you would have seen it...mld4ds said:What does the REBEL Flag represent? You knew perfectly well....