can totally agree with this statement. I homeschooled both kids and my daughter has various learning disabilities. It was like I had to go to school for myself doing all kinds of research to learn how to teach her. She is not a textbook case and we have to change and adapt each year, but it was well worth it and I wouldn't trade it for anything.
Oh I can imagine!
And your daughter has basicly "severe" CP style learning disabilties....like obvious LDs, like something you would see a lot of at an Easter Seals or United Cerebal Palsy camp. I do have to say....it is too bad that Easter Seals or UCP doesn't offer schools for kids who while they're not exactly mentally disabled, are a little more complex then "just LD"
Or like......supplemental services for kids like that. I do feel for you Kristina....but I am glad it was such a positive experiance! Does your daughter have a lot of spilinter skills?
I really think that there needs to be specialized programs/schools for kids who are more severely (but not to the point of mental disabilty) nereologically impaired...they don't fit in with the mentally disabled kids and they can't function in a typical academic setting. ( Before i get jumped on.NOT saying that to be mean or anything....It would be like putting a fifth grader in with an AP class.
jillo, Do you think that the law that encouraged mainstreaming needs to be revamped? We need to make it so that kids are "smartstreamed."
Meaning, we need some sort of system so that dhh and "just blind"/low vision (as most b/lv have multiple issues) students get the training in blindness/deafness skills that would ensure a decent education. We really need to push a continuum of placement, where kids would get awesome support and social life etc, rather then worshipping at the throne of inclusion.I really am afraid with the push towards inclusion that the dhh or other low incidence kid mainstream experiance will be repeated time and again....Have we learned nothing? I have a feeling that in ten years we'll have a bunch of kids angry and disaffected b/c they got cheated out of the services they needed to get a good education.
What schools that push mainstreaming like Clarke and CID don't understand is that mainstreaming is not innovative any more. Back in the old days it was..But now it's not. Heck, you know what would be innovative? Starting a high school program for oral kids at Clarke School. Like they have at Mary Hare in the UK. I do have to add that I really think that the oral educators who push mainstreaming are completly clueless as to what life is like in a suburban high school. It's like they think that high school is something out of High School Musical or Grease.