- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
- Reaction score
- 7
Well, bummer.
but that doesn't mean we can't apply it to ourselves
Well, bummer.
Going back to my question about who lives in a vacuum ...
I would be interested in hearing anyone's perspective on who/how you live in a vacuum? Someone that's so sheltered - e.g. not allowed any interaction with anyone else at any time (and thus the lack of opportunity to acquire/learn language) ? How does someone get so sheltered they do not interact? I cannot think of how this could be.
Discussion?
Pls include me on that sentiment!
I know what Jillio was getting at, but with some 86% of deaf kids in mainstream environments and far more deaf and hoh people on an oral track than an ASL track, I don't understand why you would want to let the majority drive where you should be going. I intend to keep bucking the trend because it's whatvworks for my child, and can't see going oral-only just because it's the majority choice.
Huh?
Well that is because you had a choice. Many of us who were mainstreamed oral only were not given a choice so were forced to go with the 'majority' in the hearing world. We now are saying the 'majority' D/dhh who were mainstreamed oral only are saying if given the choice, they wouldn't go mainstream. Big difference.
You are mixed up. Grendel is a parent making good choices for a child.
Your parents had choices too, and chose wrong. You can't keep blaming Grendel for being a better parent.
Grendel, on the other hand...School is not just academic, a la the Asian schools. It is also very social. We're arguing for both....meaning a magnet style or regional program, so that dhh kids have both social emotional development AND academic challenge....oh and so that they don't get lumped in with a general special ed resource room.Would making school a strictly social experience, rather than an academic challenge, provide a better life as an adult? If a deaf child has an easy ride and lowered expectations through primary and secondary school, what does day one at MIT or Harvard feel like if the cushioning is gone and expectations are the same for all students? Or at any college where he or she is going to be exposed to brilliant minds among peers and faculty alike.
It's an issue I think about with my daughter -- I tend to want to balance her experience, at least early on, making school something she looks forward to as a social experience, slipping the learning and language development into the mix without her realizing it. But as she grows older, I expect school to become far more of a rigorous academic environment, with more opportunities to drink from the firehouse rather than be spoonfed a bit of knowledge with a side of sugar
I think Beclak is saying that Grenal Q has a choice because she is hearing but we, deaf people never had a choice.
I think Beclak is saying that Grenal Q has a choice because she is hearing but we, deaf people never had a choice.
Going back to my question about who lives in a vacuum ...
I would be interested in hearing anyone's perspective on who/how you live in a vacuum? Someone that's so sheltered - e.g. not allowed any interaction with anyone else at any time (and thus the lack of opportunity to acquire/learn language) ? How does someone get so sheltered they do not interact? I cannot think of how this could be.
Discussion?
I can see where BecLak might be coming from. I remember the constant requests to my parents to transfer me to another program, another school, ANYTHING OTHER than where I was situated. I was always told no. I think that is about the biggest resentment I harbor. That it wasn't understood how incredibly difficult school was, socially-wise. I'd already proven myself academically-wise with top-notch grades, why not cut me a break and let me "fit in" for once while still learning?
I know. I said it isn't acquired in a vacuum.It is acquired.
I know. I said it isn't acquired in a vacuum.
It is acquired but not in a vacuum.
You are mixed up. Grendel is a parent making good choices for a child.
Your parents had choices too, and chose wrong. You can't keep blaming Grendel for being a better parent.
There have been cases of children being kept isolated by force from human contact. I wouldn't call it sheltered but imprisoned. There have also been stories about feral children who weren't imprisoned but were isolated from other humans.Going back to my question about who lives in a vacuum ...
I would be interested in hearing anyone's perspective on who/how you live in a vacuum? Someone that's so sheltered - e.g. not allowed any interaction with anyone else at any time (and thus the lack of opportunity to acquire/learn language) ? How does someone get so sheltered they do not interact? I cannot think of how this could be.
Discussion?
Yes, Grendel has made some very good choices for her child. She is very blessed to be in that school. That is what I am saying. She was able to make those choices. My parents were never given any options, were not informed of the Deaf community and sign language, so I was not exposed to anything but mainstream/oral only environments. No fault of my parents. My parents were and are very understanding and supportive under the circumstances. I know that if they were given the choices Grendel had, they would have embraced sign language, had they known that it was the 'natural' language for me. My mother recently expressed, after coming the realisation of all the difficulties I faced in communication, that even at her age now, she would learn sign language for me at least as much as she could. All my life, all we were told was I was HOH, but only 2 years ago or less I discovered I was in fact severely-deaf. That came as no surprise to me as it explained a lot of things to me. As for my hearing family, it came as quite a shock to them and they are still adjusting to this 'new' revelation.