- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
I don't hate me.
I hate humans.
MUCH DIFFERENCE IN THAT.
SKOREAPV- Of course, the written must be better than spoken language, because in words, it can mean a lot of things, so you want to be more specific on what you are trying to say. Beside if there was a lowest form of all language, ASL would be it. But you are right, there isn't any level or form of languages, there are differences and similiarities. You see, people who typed up essays, stories, and books actually wrote the same thing more than once, probably more than 10 times, because its structure is the most vulerable of all languages. You want it to be beautiful, strong, and convincing. But when you speak, it is different, you aren't really taking your time to speak, you are actually speaking out loud what your mind is saying. But if one was able to conquer the world by speaking, he would be the devil with the silver tongue. What a sly devil that fool would be.
Beside, thanks for saving my thread! WOO WOO!
What about the Roman orator Cicero who was legendary for his speeches or in more recent times Winston Churchill?
I see no reason why you can't make excellent speeches in ASL even though prose is a poor medium for ASL. It's my understanding that ASL poets tend to condsider signs carefully in order to make ASL poetry the best that it can be. I'm quite certain that Cicero and Churchill considered the effect of their words before making one of their speeches.