Texas Teen Wins Right to Give Birth Over Parents’ Objections

not quite... if the judge was using that as his guide.... then that just basically proved my point - he's made a serious grave mistake and he failed to uphold the law.

"Mature Minor Doctrine" and Mature Minor Rule" are accepted practice in U.S.

The text I provided was from a law school. Abortion is a medical procedure, so it is applicable to this situation.
 
That's true for anyone with no child, but for mother and family with child - have to through the lengthly court if they don't agree with landlord or eviction specialist or won't take their deal to resolve, so take months/years to resolve - at least in California.

For Section 8 - it is extremely hard to find it now and the section 8 system is overwhelmed so force to live with parent/families or without home.

again - see previous posts.
 
"Mature Minor Doctrine" and Mature Minor Rule" are accepted practice in U.S.

The text I provided was from a law school. Abortion is a medical procedure, so it is applicable to this situation.

not really. I seriously doubt that the judge was using this as his guide. seriously doubt it.
 
not really. I seriously doubt that the judge was using this as his guide. seriously doubt it.

We will have to agree to disagree. IMO it is pretty clear the judge applied Mature Minor Rule in this case.
 
If a teenage girl has rights to give birth, she must take care of her baby. If she can't or won't, her parents have rights to call CPS, don't they? If so, CPS would take her baby away. Meaning it costs Texas government more money for that. Texans, hello, you are gonna pay for her baby's care.
 
If a teenage girl has rights to give birth, she must take care of her baby. If she can't or won't, her parents have rights to call CPS, don't they? If so, CPS would take her baby away. Meaning it costs Texas government more money for that. Texans, hello, you are gonna pay for her baby's care.

and that will blow up on judge's face.
 
yes but most likely won't fall into your favor. the judge will say - "too bad... suck it up. you've made a choice to be a father. now do your job or you'll go to jail."

you can't just give up to be a father however or whenever you want. that doesn't work like that. unless either you are incapable of providing for your child or your child poses a grave threat to you and your family... the judge will remove him/her. other than that.... nope too bad. suck it up.
Hello, I grew up in a foster home. My parents didn't go to jail for getting rid of me.
 
again - see previous posts.

I'm scared that you are not understand about what I saying.

I have source for you - go check the real documentaries on TV about situation with between landlord and renter with child in California because state law banned to displace the child. When agreement with landlord or eviction specialist fail so it should have through the court to resolve - it will take months to years, depending on situation. I'm speaking fact based on eviction specialist's statement that concern about renters with child.

You need have cable to access.
 
Hello, I grew up in a foster home. My parents didn't go to jail for getting rid of me.

you grew up in a foster home.... not on a street.... meaning the law had taken matter in your situation.
 
I'm scared that you are not understand about what I saying.

I have source for you - go check the real documentaries on TV about situation with between landlord and renter with child in California because state law banned to displace the child. When agreement with landlord or eviction specialist fail so it should have through the court to resolve - it will take months to years, depending on situation. I'm speaking fact based on eviction specialist's statement that concern about renters with child.

You need have cable to access.

no I'm not going to waste my time and check hundreds of channels to find out what you're referring about.

please do feel free to direct me to a very specific source.
 
We will have to agree to disagree. IMO it is pretty clear the judge applied Mature Minor Rule in this case.

and IMO - I think the judge was attempting to preserve fetus' life.
 
no I'm not going to waste my time and check hundreds of channels to find out what you're referring about.

please do feel free to direct me to a very specific source.

World's Worst Tenants on Spike TV. The episode is "Kicking Down Doors".

Those are based on reenactment of real stories.
 
If a teenage girl has rights to give birth, she must take care of her baby. If she can't or won't, her parents have rights to call CPS, don't they? If so, CPS would take her baby away. Meaning it costs Texas government more money for that. Texans, hello, you are gonna pay for her baby's care.

Yes. If need be.
 
World's Worst Tenants on Spike TV. The episode is "Kicking Down Doors".

Those are based on reenactment of real stories.

oh boy..... not gonna touch this.
 
oh boy..... not gonna touch this.

You missed a word - reenactment: the shows are fake but based on true event.

If you don't want to touch so there is nothing for me to argue any further. I'm going let you to find out in real life.
 
You missed a word - reenactment: the shows are fake but based on true event.

If you don't want to touch so there is nothing for me to argue any further. I'm going let you to find out in real life.

I missed nothing.
 
I missed nothing.

No, you missed my point.

That's common for states that ban on displace of child, especially renters, so when agreement with landlord fail so the court will be only option to resolve. The lengthly process is nature of court, depending on area.
 
Back
Top