anakin
Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 895
- Reaction score
- 4
I would even if it involved embryo's because an embryo is not sentient and not a baby.
kokonut will tell you it's a human being.
I would even if it involved embryo's because an embryo is not sentient and not a baby.
I would even if it involved embryo's because an embryo is not sentient and not a baby.
Faire jour...the key word is less likely to happen with adult stem cells than embryonic though there seem hardly any evidence that adult stem cells can cause tumors.
Why Embryonic Stem Cells Are Obsolete - Heart to Heart (usnews.com)
Online NewsHour: Forum: Adult Stem Cells -- Aug. 9, 2004
Adult Stem Cells Used to Prevent Tumors in ESCR - Wellsphere
kokonut will tell you it's a human being.
kokonut will tell you it's a human being.
Every embryo is a human being because it has DNA but we can use the same logic for stem cell. Every stem cell is a human being therefore it is wrong!
That's why it's pure non-sense. I refuse to label an embryo a person.
Rather it's the DNA/RNA that makes us who were are as human species.
That's a matter of personal opinion with no scientific argument to back it up.
Actually, barring one person in the history of the world, nothing has every cured hearing loss. And the one person who was "cured" still has a loss! So, actually, science backs me up 100%.
It's the saying of "can't" as it will never cure sensorineural deafness. Only time will tell and so far the odds on bet is that it eventually will.
These quacks prey on vulnerable people who cannot accept deafness. The quacks give people false hope, and it fulfills an emotional need for the deaf people who cannot adjust to the reality of their situation. No different than a modern-day snake oil salesman.
Who are "these quacks" you're referring to? Do you any *evidence* that what you're saying is the case? How do you know it's false hope when scientists from around the world are actually working on stem cells and for the restoration on sensorineural hearing loss and that in mouse models have shown some regenerative capacity?