Do you mean Scott thought the cop was going to shoot him in the car because of the warrant?He had a warrant for unpaid child support .And he could of feared for his life
with all the shooting that happen lately.
Do you mean Scott thought the cop was going to shoot him in the car because of the warrant?
Also, if that was the case, why would he leave his passenger behind to face the cop?
I guess we'll never know.
Why flee in the first place? If the driver has no insurance... he'd most likely get a ticket and probably impound his car. Better than going to jail for fleeing a police.
He has no registration - more bound for arrest.
Not shooting at all would be the best option.Warrant for child support...broken tail light...no registration...no insurance....wheeee!...he knew he was bound for the jail house....So, he's up and away....Catch me if you can...feel most likely he avoided all Cops until he was finally pulled over for the broken tail light. Then he knew his goose was cooked....And this 50 year old Cop knew he couldn't catch him...so he shot him.....And add another charge of eluding and fleeing a police officer...(even tho' he was dead)....
Shooting the guy in the legs would have been a better option, wouldn't it?...But someone said..."Cops are trained to shoot to kill"....
Warrant for child support...broken tail light...no registration...no insurance....wheeee!...he knew he was bound for the jail house....So, he's up and away....Catch me if you can...feel most likely he avoided all Cops until he was finally pulled over for the broken tail light. Then he knew his goose was cooked....And this 50 year old Cop knew he couldn't catch him...so he shot him.....And add another charge of eluding and fleeing a police officer...(even tho' he was dead)....
Shooting the guy in the legs would have been a better option, wouldn't it?...But someone said..."Cops are trained to shoot to kill"....
Do you mean Scott thought the cop was going to shoot him in the car because of the warrant?
Also, if that was the case, why would he leave his passenger behind to face the cop?
I guess we'll never know.
That's why I asked. I don't understand what you mean. What did he fear would happen to his life if he stayed in the car?I did not say that ! I said b/c of all the shooting that happen he could had feared for his life , .
That's why I hope the passenger in the car will say something.We'll never know what was going on in his mind , all I can think of is that we have a Black man being pulled over by a White cop and the Black guy may had started fearing for his life b/c of what been going on in the news .
If they add captions or subtitles to the dash cam video, that will be good.
Just to add--when the cop approaches the driver of the car, he speaks calmly the whole time. He doesn't sound angry or threatening at all. He just asks the standard traffic stop questions.
In the recent dash cam video transcript, the cop did told him to stay in the seat in the car when he 1st came out. The 2nd time after a few mins, there seem to be a conversation between the two and then he got out again and ran away.
The question to why he ran away is that he knew he has a warrant out for him which is why cop came back to his patrol car to run his name and license plate. If he stayed in the car and cooperate, this would not happen and we will never hear it in the news. But he ran and then we hear another episode of Ferguson all over again.
It would save him the time and money to go to jail instead of facing more consequences of fleeing the police/resisting arrest. This guy made a poor choice to flee and the dash video proves that but the witness video proves the cop did the wrongdoing with tampering the evidences.
The two men at the center of a racially charged shooting in South Carolina are Coast Guard veterans.
North Charleston police officer Michael T. Slager, 33, and the unarmed black man he shot following a routine traffic stop, 50-year-old Walter L. Scott, served as junior enlisted Coast Guardsmen earlier in their lives, according to service records provided to Navy Times.
. . .
Personnel records show that Slager served in the Coast Guard from 2003 to 2009, last serving at Station Cape Canaveral, Florida, as an unrated fireman before his honorable discharge.
His service record is unusual as most enlisted qualify for a rating within a few years of service and move up the petty officer ranks, a retired Coast Guard captain told Navy Times.
The Coast Guard is known for long wait times for "A" school, retired Capt. Jim Howe said, but six years is highly unlikely.
"It's possible he got rated and then through nonjudicial punishment or court-martial was reduced in rate back to E-3, but that is just speculation," he said. The Coast Guard was unable to provide a full record of his dates of rank, awards and duty stations on Thursday.
It's also possible that he was on a long wait-list for "A" school and then had some sort of medical setback that kept him from professional training, Howe said.
"Very curious, if you ask me," Howe added.
Scott received a general discharge under honorable conditions stemming from a drug charge in 1986. He served two years and was last stationed at Coast Guard Yard in Baltimore as an unrated fireman apprentice.