- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 44,482
- Reaction score
- 448
What? I thought they paid their own way???
Again if they flee SC it is a success for SC
Whatever, let you find out on your own.
It is still epic fail to me.
What? I thought they paid their own way???
Again if they flee SC it is a success for SC
What? I thought they paid their own way???
Again if they flee SC it is a success for SC
Whatever, let you find out on your own.
It is still epic fail to me.
What? I thought they paid their own way???
Again if they flee SC it is a success for SC
What? I thought they paid their own way???
Again if they flee SC it is a success for SC
even with an illegal method?
to me - it's no different with using a federally-banned poison for your rat problem.
For the record - I'm FOR both individual's rights and state's rights.So, just for the record you are for an individuals right to protect themselves but against the rights of the state.
I don't see it as illegal and apparently a whole bunch of lawyers don't either. :shrug:
Nice attitude.
For the record - I'm FOR both individual's rights and state's rights.
In this case.... the rights of the state? what rights? it's illegal lol!
I have to say that without a doubt this law is 100% RACIST. I am terribly angry that this bill has passed. Not allowing people of other races to live in......
ahem excuse me a second........
What? What do you mean? So people of all races CAN live and work in South Carolina if they are there legally? So it has nothing to do with race at all..... just whether or not they are legally here.
Ahem....
Nevermind
I have to say that without a doubt this law is 100% RACIST. I am terribly angry that this bill has passed. Not allowing people of other races to live in......
ahem excuse me a second........
What? What do you mean? So people of all races CAN live and work in South Carolina if they are there legally? So it has nothing to do with race at all..... just whether or not they are legally here.
Ahem....
Nevermind
eh what for?We will see.....
Utah passed comprehensive immigration in March that was blocked by a federal judge.
Arizona-style laws have been rejected or failed to advance during the 2011 legislative session in California, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, South Dakota and Wyoming.
Nice jawboning, white boy. At least you won't be asked to show your citizenship.
THAT is the point.
Nice jawboning, white boy. At least you won't be asked to show your citizenship.
THAT is the point.
eh what for?
and a crucial portion of Arizona's immigration law was blocked.
still need more "hint"?
I might........I have a habit of saying g'day and ending sentences with eh.
Nice jawboning, white boy. At least you won't be asked to show your citizenship.
THAT is the point.
'scuse me? My red-headed, blue-eyed, so white he's nearly albino, husband had to show his green card a few times over the 20 years he held it. A couple times for employment, once for a traffic stop, I think a couple other times for one thing and the other.
Probably the cop didn't like red-heads and was profiling him. Or it might have been that not stopping for a red light thing that did him in...