Sorenson ignore FCC regulations?

As of this time, I do not have it. I might be able to find out. You are right most people think this way.

Why Dlink needs financial support. Well, there is good reason there. There are other brands of VC unit which usually cost around 1,000 to 2,000 at the time Dlink was working with Sorenson. Sorenson balked at the idea of this concept thinking it is not MARKETABLE, and Sorenson was out to prove them wrong. Sorenson proved them worng big time already.
I think that is EXACTLY what really happened. Don't you all know the idea of having Videophone dated back to 1929?

qwerty123 said:
Do you have these patent numbers? Sorenson is the inventor and Dlink is the manufacturer. That is why many people assumed that Sorenson "copied" the design, etc, but it was the other way around.

Financial support, make sense, but why Dlink need the money when it is already big and selling many other products.
Click to expand...
 
So back in 1929 the problem was transmission speed?
 
No, the idea was surfaced during this time,. They did try to develop unit, didn't have success with them because of alot of technical issue, transmission speed might be the reason
The first successful transmission was in 1950's not sure exact date, the first videophone call was initated in Los Angeles, and the reciever was in the empire state building in NYC. It did work, but very choppy and black n white

Tousi said:
So back in 1929 the problem was transmission speed?
Click to expand...
 
Right on! Sorenson don't lie to you! I already proved myself... I did contact Sorenson about the policy if exist about usage of Sorenson VP and other brand of VP. Know what was their answer? They said there is no such policy limits nor bars you from any other providers giving you free VP, and there is NO POLICY that limits you with one VP device. So, I realize that they are not in control with us, and that they wanted their own VP to be used for their benefits and our benefits as well. Sorenson don't lie!

If you do NOT like Sorenson, are you too lazy to apply for free DVC from C-S-D.org, or HIPVRS.COM? They WILL give you free DVC-1000, whats your deal? I don't see how you could be ripped off! Rip off means that you pay for something and get nothing in return. You haven't pay a dime for VP, and how can u get nothing in return????

THINK!!!

Deaf258 said:
Can you please buy yourself a dictionary?

SorensonVRS does not mislead.

How can SorensonVRS "rip you off" when the equipment and service you receive are free?

The only people who are misled are the ones who won't read the fine print.

Personally, I think you and Dick are the ones who try to mislead others.
Click to expand...
 
diehardbiker65 said:
As of this time, I do not have it. I might be able to find out. You are right most people think this way.

Why Dlink needs financial support. Well, there is good reason there. There are other brands of VC unit which usually cost around 1,000 to 2,000 at the time Dlink was working with Sorenson. Sorenson balked at the idea of this concept thinking it is not MARKETABLE, and Sorenson was out to prove them wrong. Sorenson proved them worng big time already.
I think that is EXACTLY what really happened. Don't you all know the idea of having Videophone dated back to 1929?
Click to expand...

Remember the fact, Sorenson had a special silicon chip made. The Digital Signal Processor (DSP) chip is on the printed circuit board, is black, and has many conenctor pins all around its side. This is the videophone heart where all functions are contained herein.

Anyway, my point is that the DSP chip was CUSTOM MADE by Texas Instruments (im not too sure of the right chip manufacturer), passed on the chip to Dlink for vp production.

Lets do reaearch on patents to see what both Dlink and Sorenson have. I know Sorenson have the patent on video compresssion/decompression, namely codec, with is the core foundation of video conferencing due to bandwidth and packet loss over the internet.

Roehm, butt out. :booty:
 
Off Topic

My apologies if this message seems off topic, so lets not pursue after reading my posting.

[flame protection suit on]

This morning, I had a causal chat with of my close friend whom I have asked him to go to alldeaf.com and look over this category especially on VRS politics.

His first reaction was why would Richard Roehm as a deaf advocacy director scoop so low to do the posting on alldeaf.com (shaking head). Are there any other agency directors, deaf or not, do this kind of postings? Not even anyone from the CCASDHH. I am clapping to all members of CCASDHH that they have kept up their moral standards toward the deaf community.

[flame protection suit off]

NightwarriorJin said:
Richard

You already post often in other thread about the lawsuit. You need not to mention over and over. Also, your remark about how Sorenson take interpreter away, what about other VRS business? they use the community interpreter as well.
Click to expand...
 
qwerty123 said:
Whatever you say. There is only one new member, Richard Trybus of San Diego and there isnt any significant face changes.
Click to expand...

I gotta hand it to you, that was a nice one, anyhow just open your eyes a bit wider and you'll see the picture is very different from the last time you saw it.

Richard
 
Richard, stop going off-topic. If you want to discuss about this, create a new thread and invite them to discuss over there.

Thank you.
 
I'm the gonzo style deaf advocate and I'll act like one whether you like it or not. I use a lot of spices in my foods and I'll use a lot of spices in my postings.

Richard
 
I feel sorry for those who is so SUPER obsessioned about Sorenson issues... There are two other VRS providers giving away free Dlink DVC-1000 and none of you are taking advantage of this! (Shooking my head in disbelief).

Here is good example giving you an idea... Suppose you wanted a car, and Ford motor corpration refused to give what you want out of your car, would you whine, complain, etc etc against Ford Motor corporation or you just simply forget about Ford, and find other Make, as there is PLENTY of other makes for you to buy from and still use same road as if you would had this Fix Or Repair Daily car!

I am not sure how to get my point across your closed obsessed minded! You all are letting Sorenson win the game very easily... The only way for Sorenson to lose the game is that ALL of you take VP-100 back and apply for free DVC-1000 from CSD or Sprint. But since you refused to practice this concept, Sorenson is going to stay and laugh at your asses off. Sorry, thats sad truth and blunt.
 
My crystal ball is much more clearer than what diehardbiker65 has. Whether you like it or not, Sorenson isnt gonna survive the interoperability rock headed for the space between it's eyes. And that's that.

Richard
 
I don't think you understand what I am saying... If you think Sorenson is going bust, then why keep screaming at us? What seems to be your problem?

For hundred thousands of times, I have told you that I am not in any sides!!! I am not even on Sorenson's side, nor your side. I am just telling you what I think based on DAMN NEUTRAL side!!!

Suppose Sorenson had gone out of business, then its fine by me. Why should I worry? I think you are ranting for NOTHING!


Nesmuth said:
My crystal ball is much more clearer than what diehardbiker65 has. Whether you like it or not, Sorenson isnt gonna survive the interoperability rock headed for the space between it's eyes. And that's that.

Richard
Click to expand...
 
diehardbiker65 said:
I am not sure how to get my point across your closed obsessed minded! You all are letting Sorenson win the game very easily... The only way for Sorenson to lose the game is that ALL of you take VP-100 back and apply for free DVC-1000 from CSD or Sprint. But since you refused to practice this concept, Sorenson is going to stay and laugh at your asses off. Sorry, thats sad truth and blunt.
Click to expand...

I don't see how Roehm is still ranting at Sorenson for all I care. Even Sorenson allow other VRS providers on VP100, Sorenson will still be exist due to the high quality features that Dlink cant provide. Not to mention the marvelous Sorenson tech support team where HOVRS and CSD couldn't provide.

We saw the poll recently that more people want their S VP 100 to call other VRS providers, so that day will come sooner or later.

I loathe the Dlink DVC100 features especially the two screen, redial screen and the "missed call" feature.

Roehm, swallow more AD ranting pills and go ahead snoop your gonzo advocacy role to its all times low. No other CEO would do that. Even you take the Uluru rock and sling against Goliath, Sorenson will survive.

http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2005/03/08/uluru-ayers-rock-the-largest-rock-in-the-world
 
I do not have VRS so what is the current best product to get right now and how do I go about testing my upload speed? I want to use a regular TV next to my computer for this. Any neutral suggestions? Thanks.
 
Back
Top