- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 143
Well you still have the internet.
Internet will one day cease to exist.
Well you still have the internet.
Internet will one day cease to exist.
Oh, no, not that Mayan calendar thing again!
I stopped hanging with deaf people because most of them don't sign anyhow, and I can't hardly understand them as I do with hearing people.
This isn't about deaf people preferring to talk. It's about hearing people preferring deaf people to talk when they prefer to sign.
Deaf people have always learned to talk for generations after generations, it's no difference than today. The problem is, some do want the right to be part of the deaf culture, and like I say, if social service start coming after us for not implanting our babies or something, isn't that the same as forcing the children away from their family?
Wirelessly posted
100 years? Try 400-600 years.
Bottesini said:Wirelessly posted
100 years? Try 400-600 years.
For that long, they did not credit deaf people with the ability to learn to speak.
Is any culture the same as it was a half a century ago? Also not everyone gains benefit from a CI and it is due to many more reasons that just nerve damage or APD. There are many reasons that a CI will not be benifical.Yes, but it changes the rules of the game a bit. With hearing aids, usually severe and moderate hearing losses gain the benefits; with cochlear implants, the profound gains the benefit. So effectively, the only people who don't get any benefit at all are the ones with nerve damages or APD. So, yes, Deaf culture will still be there, but it won't be the same one as we saw a decade or three ago. Now you understand?
It is not that the Deaf culture will cease to exist, it just won't be the same as it was a half a century ago. And people fear changes. Whether or not it's a good thing or not, I don't know. That's why we have "conservatives" and "progressives" in politics. One tries to advance forward whether or not it's good for society, the other takes heed and be cautious of dangerous decisions in favour of status quo.
Wirelessly posted
100 years? Try 400-600 years. It's only in the last 150 years technology has been applied.
I always do for all of your posts... jk............*Imagine me doing a finger waving gesture in a bitchy way*
Daredevel7 said:souggy said:100 years? Try 400-600 years. It's only in the last 150 years technology has been applied.
See? It don't do a thang to the Deaf culture, oh no, it doesn't.
*Imagine me doing a finger waving gesture in a bitchy way*
*Imagine me doing a finger waving gesture in a bitchy way*
The VERY last deaf person?...Hmm. Glad it won't be me (at least I hope it won't be me!), it would sucks to be the last deaf person in the whole world.
Although I wonder if it would make a good novel out of this notion?
Ishi, the last of his tribe. So the concept has already been done.
Umm, not talking about Native American. I am talking about deaf people.
souggy, not quite. It's based on the presumption that hoh folks are "more hearing" then deaf.
And Daredevil, you're 100% right. It's going to be a while before we can honestly say if this generation will be able to assimulate into hearing society better then previous generations.
Just b/c a kid can aqquire speech easily, it does not mean that it will be the only helpful tool in their toolbox. 28 years ago when I got my hearing aids, and mastered speech the experts thought that's ALL I "needed"
The thing is.......in order to prefer one or the other mode of communication, you have to present a CHOICE between two options. You can't just give them oral skills and go " oh they've mastered oral skills and don't "need" ASL.