EyesBlueDeaf
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2005
- Messages
- 1,209
- Reaction score
- 1
count me in!
Hence, I think being deaf is a completely different concept to the experiences arising from being deaf. Its like asking quadriplegic people if they are proud of being such. I think many people would argue that Christopher Reeve inspired us all with his tenacity, courage and strength after being wheelchair bound, and those dreadful experiences made him into the person we all admired. However, it is foolish to assume that he was proud of being in a wheelchair, rather he would have being proud of who he became as a result.
Rather the issue here is- are people actually proud of being disabled (that being deafness here, obviously), OR are they proud of the experiences and insights they have gained from being deaf? On the other hand, its definitely possible to be proud of both....
Being both Deaf and quadriplegic, I'm not sure I can separate out the fact that I am deaf from my experiences as a Deaf person. Likewise, being quadriplegic is fundamental to having the experiences of one in a wheelchair. I don't see myself as courageous or tenacious (though my friends may disagree) because of my quadriplegia. I see myself as someone dealt a hand who now must choose to sit back and watch the game play out on the sidelines, or play those cards to the best of my ability. I'm proud of who I am, mostly about being a physician. That's something I achieved and can be proud of. But who I am is Deaf, quad, good friend, daughter, dog owner, rabid reader, blue eyed, and so forth., many of which I cannot choose or change.
btw, politically correct terminology is wheelchair user, or wheelchair enabled, or non-ambulatory. My wheelchair sets me free, I am in no way "bound" into it. The last thing I want to be is an "inspiration" or role (roll?) model.