Lighthouse77
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
- Messages
- 4,166
- Reaction score
- 1
AllDeaf.com - View Single Post - Re: Deaf Customers Can Now “Read” Voicemail? <---- here is one post I never want to see
AllDeaf.com - View Single Post - Re: Deaf Customers Can Now “Read” Voicemail? <---- here is one post I never want to see
he used "Deaf"
Yeah, but he was referring to their weak English, not their actual deafness.
I wonder if those two don't sometimes go hand in hand.....
Before we get carried too far away here, first things first: That sentence referenced above, #6 is referring to hearing people. I was taken aback at that.
Separately, I, personally, don't see how there can be deaf to deaf audism, given the definition of audism.
Again, separately, this word was coined in about 1974 and has not yet been accepted as a "legal" word.
P.S. Posted at about the same time so let me go look........# 6 says "Hearing people.........."
Citizens that cannot sign are provided access to the free sign language classes.
Audism has always been a thorny subject for a long time, it was defined in 1977 but buried so deep in the books.
It was just too thorny; Deaf elitists would actually practise audism themselves without realising it. Systematic audism, the Deaf elitists actually suffered from systematic audism when they in turn practised audism on others.
Some Deaf elitists would assume other Deaf people with a lower "d" didn't understand Deaf culture because they weren't educated about the Deaf-World, they didn't go to the Deaf institution, they weren't from a Deaf family and they didn't have a Deaf identity.
Systematic audism had to be broken free in order to analyse ourselves to realise that we actually did this to others because hearing people did this to us. We needed to self-project the audism towards the weaker kind. We were viewed as the weaker kind by the hearing people therefore we had to find the weaker kind; DeafBlind, Deaf with physical handicaps.
Yes, audism is thorny and still is. It is hard to accept and discuss audism because it means we have to seek within ourselves our wrongdoings towards our own community.
It starts with ourselves and it starts with our community; AD.
Yes, if it was up for me to redefine the principles, I would have had redefined the #6 as well.
Accessibility is a right for everyone.
Even though that was nicely said, Patty, I have to think the larger, more difficult task facing the deaf world is outside ourselves. And I think we waste time, spin our wheels flashing the audism card when oppression and other words will do as a lot of issues will need to be taken up with various governments, courts, etc where the word audism will not see the light of day since it hasn't been an officially recognized word these past 30 yrs or more. There are plenty of similar words to use in our battles.
Ok, good, good; that's clear......
I'm going to look thru the vids and then comment on this thread when I'm done.