are you seriously going to bring up the Failing Ugly article? The guy behind that article is all against AB, and claims to be an expert on CIs when he doesn't even have any CIs himself, doesn't personally work for any CI company, doesn't personally do ANYTHING with CIs himself (and has the tendency to twist words/facts around and exaggerate). I wouldn't believe the "garbage" he's publishing on that blog, because I don't trust the blogger. He's rubbed me the wrong way for years when it comes to the topic of CIs, especially when it comes to AB. I'll take baseballboy's experiences over this blogger's "info", because baseballboy has actual experience and can compare Cochlear with AB (not very many people get 1 manufacturer in 1 ear and another in the other ear).
AB has revised the internal component by adding a sheath to the electrode, so there shouldn't be any more "burning" or "shocking" sensations basically. And that only happened to 2 individuals who had severe cases of the shocking (they have since been reimplanted with AB implants and are doing great now).
And as for the CIs breaking/etc.. all three manufacturers have had their recalls and problems. The CI is a man-made product, so it is bound to quit functioning at any time. But each company will do what they can to make sure their products are as sturdy as possible. It's all a matter of personal preference really. I myself would still choose AB for myself.. Don't get me wrong, Cochlear has a great device, as does Med-El, but I'm more impressed with AB's product, despite their history of recalls.
Pretty much explained what I wanted to say if i felt like it.
@ baseballboy, thank you for your responses. I noticed that your AB broke a few times. What happened? I am currently on the fence between AB and Cochlear. I initially chose AB because it provides better sounds as well as improves speech discrimination slightly in noisy environment and music. This is crucial for me. However, as I am doing further research, I have noticed that AB is not as reliable as Cochlear. In fact, many recipients experienced broken parts and replaced them with new ones. I'm concerned about this. How can I prevent it from breaking if I choose to use AB? I think I'm going with Cochlear because there won't be any time for me to keep undergoing surgeries. Now that you are the user of both companies, which is your favorite?
No problem, its something you have to be very sure about since its expensive and its surgery (nbd though).
Here's the thing you should consider the most. Even though both companies have implants and a line up of processors, you have to look into the future of each company. The future of each company are very promising and I strongly believe that each company will have processors that will be very compedtive. Its very hard to say which company will have a brighter future, offering better processors and features.
Currently:
Both AB and cochlear offer high quality services, I have never been once disappointed by AB customers in the last 15 years. If my processors broke, they'd replace it within 2 days. With the Harmony, I never had anything break on me for a year besides the wire (which is very thin compare to the N5). I was told that the N5 wire can last up to 3 years before the metal inside the wire will "disconnect". My old BTE wire had to be replace every 8-12 months since it would get "weak" and cut off connection to my headpiece.
If I had a say, Cochlear America does seem to be more reliable than AB. Besides implants because obviously both companies want to implant people with implants that will last for years to come. Besides implants, AB's harmony seem to be very reliable, but same with the N5. I havent had issues with the harmony on my left since I got it besides replacing the wire (which is no biggie). As mentioned before, IMO, the harmony has better sounds and the Cochlear N5 has more features. Both are very reliable, and aren't easily meant to be broken unless you abuse them day to day.
If you are really really worried about the actually implant breaking, dont be. Its very highly unlikely to break with such advanced technology. I wouldnt even take it into consideration when choosing companies. What i would consider is, the processors, the reliability and the services of both companies (although they tie at services, very organized system, very efficient, very easy to use and very fair about returns)
My story: When the first processor broke, the electro wire of the implant was actually broken (crack) and they took the blame, paid for everything including my next generation processor. 14 years later (few months ago), it broke, never found out why but I assume it just got old and gave up. I am expecting my implants to break in 30+years because after all, it is technology, and technology breaks all the time, computers, phones, anything you name, breaks eventually. I KNOW both companies try their best to avoid these issues.
Please, see my other thread/posts because I offer a lot more information than just this post. Think you really benefit from my past posts on both processors:
http://www.alldeaf.com/hearing-aids-cochlear-implants/87191-pats-bbaseballboy-surgery-log.html
http://www.alldeaf.com/introduce-yourself/86957-15-years-implant-user.html
http://www.alldeaf.com/hearing-aids...1-could-use-some-help-choosing-companies.html