Parents want hearing school to get state funding

Jiro said:
yes it's illegal for unlicensed person to do the profession that requires license. The "house" is registered with Nevada government and the "escorts" are required to be licensed. To do the "service" with no license.... the manager of the "house" would be fined and even get shut down for good.
Click to expand...

But that's conducting business on business grounds. I'm talking about at any time.
 
Frisky Feline said:
that's what i am wondering if the student teachers are allowed to authorize it such as contacting with IEP and get involved with children's future as well as discussing with the children of parents. I dont know if they allow to do that while they are not licensed and without the licensed teachers being presence.
Click to expand...

No, student teachers are not authorized to write IEPs but they can sit at IEP meetings under the supervision of a licensed teacher. As for giving their input at the meetings, it all depends on the school and the parents but one thing is for sure, that the student teacher's role must be made clear at the IEP meetings. If they are presented as teachers, then it may be under false pretenses.
 
Daredevel7 said:
So she can say "I can cut your hair for $20, but Im not licensed. Deal?" and it's still legal?
Click to expand...

Sure, because the person agreeing to let her cut their hair knows that she is not licensed and they accept the risk. Of course, they can't turn around and sue her because they got a bad haircut, either. People are licensed because they are providing a service that comes with signigicant liability.
 
As an example:

To be eligible for a professional certificate, PACE candidates will successfully complete requirements as follows.

2. Candidates will complete three successful years of teaching in a South Carolina public school including successful completion of the Assisting, Developing, and Evaluating Professional Teaching (ADEPT) process. This will include successful participation in an induction program that includes a mentoring program, successful completion of the formal evaluation process, and a successful formal or informal evaluation during the final year of program participation. Consistent with the ADEPT regulation (R. 43-205.1), a candidate must not receive a continuing contract until he or she has completed all PACE requirements and is eligible to advance to professional certification.

3. Candidates will successfully complete three courses from the list of core courses approved by the Division of Educator Quality and Leadership on behalf of the State Board of Education. Courses identified for individual teachers will be based on the individual's experience, knowledge, and skills.

The three required courses must be completed for college credit with an assigned grade of B or better. Courses must be completed at a South Carolina institution with a teacher education program approved by the State Board of Education for certification purposes. Eligible participants may request approval of courses from other regionally accredited colleges or universities provided the coursework is at the graduate level. However, no more than one of the courses (three semester hours) can be designated as a Professional Development (PD) course. Only the PD course could be completed as pass/fail.

4. Candidates will earn a passing score on the appropriate level of the pedagogy Praxis II examination, Principles of Learning and Teaching (PLT), prior to advancing to the professional certificate.
Click to expand...
PACE Guidelines
 
shel90 said:
No, student teachers are not authorized to write IEPs but they can sit at IEP meetings under the supervision of a licensed teacher. As for giving their input at the meetings, it all depends on the school and the parents but one thing is for sure, that the student teacher's role must be made clear at the IEP meetings. If they are presented as teachers, then it may be under false pretenses.
Click to expand...

Thank you.
 
Daredevel7 said:
So she can say "I can cut your hair for $20, but Im not licensed. Deal?" and it's still legal?
Click to expand...

I think so..I am not familiar with hairdressers but as long as the customers arent getting their haircut under false pretenses, then I think it is ok. If one tells their customers that they are licensed, it is unethical but illegal? I have no idea.
 
shel90 said:
I think so..I am not familiar with hairdressers but as long as the customers arent getting their haircut under false premises, then I think it is ok. If one tells their customers that they are licensed, it is unethical but illegal? I have no idea.
Click to expand...

Yep. It is illegal, too. Taking money under false pretenses.
 
shel90 said:
However, if an engineer doesnt get a license, will he/she get fired from his/her job?

I will get fired if I dont renew my certification every 5 years.

Can doctors practice when their license are suspended? No, because the of the laws.

I dont know about engineering so can you clarify what the laws are for engineering? Can an engineer practice without a license?
Click to expand...

if the engineers work for government or public service, yes they are required to have a license called Professional Engineering. Same for architects. You will get PE prefix to your name for engineering and RA for architecture.
 
Daredevel7 said:
Interesting. I guess I'm kinda fuzzy on this because I doubt it's illegal for an unlicensed person to practice professions that require to be licensed. For example, a woman who isn't licensed does hairdressing out of her own house for family and friends. I was just curious at what point does it become illegal? When it becomes a business? or when it is conducted on business grounds?

Thanks for putting up with my questions... ;)
Click to expand...
I don't want to further derail this thread, so you might want to look at these FAQs. You might be surprised at how much is involved.

South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation
 
Jiro said:
if the engineers work for government or public service, yes they are required to have a license called Professional Engineering. Same for architects. You will get PE prefix to your name for engineering and RA for architecture.
Click to expand...

Because of professional liability issues.
 
Jiro said:
if the engineers work for government or public service, yes they are required to have a license called Professional Engineering. Same for architects. You will get PE prefix to your name for engineering and RA for architecture.
Click to expand...

That is incorrect. Working for the government automatically does not require a PE, only the TYPE of work they do. Architects or civil engineers do because they need the license to stamp blueprints for approval.
 
Daredevel7 said:
That is incorrect. Working for the government automatically does not require a PE, only the TYPE of work they do. Architects or civil engineers do because they need the license to stamp blueprints for approval.
Click to expand...

Because they have professional libility if they approve something that is a danger.
 
Daredevel7 said:
That is incorrect. Working for the government automatically does not require a PE, only the TYPE of work they do. Architects or civil engineers do because they need the license to stamp blueprints for approval.
Click to expand...

oh I have to be THAT specific? c'mon.
 
shel90 said:
I think so..I am not familiar with hairdressers but as long as the customers arent getting their haircut under false pretenses, then I think it is ok. If one tells their customers that they are licensed, it is unethical but illegal? I have no idea.
Click to expand...
It's against state laws to work in a salon as a cosmetologist without a license. It's considered a health hazard because clients could be harmed by bacterial infections, cuts, chemical burns, hot iron burns, eye irritations, etc. A lot of cosmetology training is about safety and sanitation, not just hairdressing skills.
 
jillio said:
Because they have professional libility if they approve something that is a danger.
Click to expand...

Correct. But not all engineers create blueprints or documentation that directly affect the production of something.

There's engineers who do testing, analysis, conceptualizing, etc etc.
 
Daredevel7 said:
Correct. But not all engineers create blueprints or documentation that directly affect the production of something.

There's engineers who do testing, analysis, conceptualizing, etc etc.
Click to expand...

Sure. The difference is in providing a service to the public that could result in a negative consequence. That is the reason behind licensure.
 
FJ was just expressing what she knows. She is not out there teaching and writing IEP without a license.

I've always asked people what they know about the subject rather they are licensed or not.
 
I just did some backtracking to see how did this thread leads to this professionalism stuff. Now I get it.

Post #421 where FJ said that she's a teacher but in post #423 - FJ said she has not completed the teacher licensing requirement. Now that is a no no because those 2 posts contradict with each other. I think we all know that when one says he/she's a teacher... we all assume that he/she is licensed. Same thing with doctor and doctor-in-training.

just saying.
 
jillio said:
Sure. The difference is in providing a service to the public that could result in a negative consequence. That is the reason behind licensure.
Click to expand...

Right. Well, I was just curious about at what point does it become illegal. Now, I have a much better understanding. I'm satisfied. ;)

So, back the the topic. It's becoming evident that upholding the law has financial limits. (And this can be said for many many many laws/rules)
 
Back
Top