Olbermann Suspended

Status
Not open for further replies.

saywhatkid

Huked on fonix werx!
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
7,618
Reaction score
27
Source: Yahoo

MSNBC suspended "Countdown" host Keith Olbermann Friday after the news that he donated to three Democratic candidates.

By Michael Calderone
Fri Nov 5, 2:04 pm ET

"I became aware of Keith's political contributions late last night," MSNBC President Phil Griffin said in a statement. "Mindful of NBC News policy and standards, I have suspended him indefinitely without pay."

Olbermann gave the maximum individual donation of $2,400 to three candidates in Tuesday's election: Arizona Reps. Gabrielle Giffords and Raul Grijalva and Senate hopeful Jack Conway, who lost in Kentucky to Republican Rand Paul. (Grijalva appeared on Olbermann's "Countdown" on Oct. 28, the same day the host donated to his campaign; Conway was last a guest in May).

Olbermann, in a statement to Politico, said that he "did not privately or publicly encourage anyone else to donate to these campaigns nor to any others in this election or any previous ones." Also, Olbermann said he had not "previously donated to any political campaign at any level."

But the revelation raised clear ethical issues.

Olbermann, a liberal commentator, gives his opinions each night on the air. But NBC News editorial staffers -- like journalists at most news organizations -- are forbidden from giving to political candidates. Also, Olbermann anchored election coverage Tuesday night without disclosing that he'd given to candidates who were running for office.

By punishing the network's biggest star, Griffin showed how little tolerance there is for hosts to make undisclosed political contributions while covering those political races.

An MSNBC spokesman told The Upshot that The Nation's Chris Hayes, an MSNBC contributor who has filled in before for Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, will host Friday night's show. Hayes has spoken publicly before about donating $250 to a friend's Congressional campaign in Alabama. He made the last donation in 2009, before becoming an MSNBC contributor. [UPDATE: MSNBC now says Hayes will not be subbing tonight]

MSNBC already attracted criticism this week for having its liberal hosts and commentators anchor election night coverage. Typically, nonpartisan journalists anchor major news events—such as election results—while commentators like Bill O'Reilly (Fox News) or James Carville (CNN) offer analysis.

It's ironic that Olbermann gave to political candidates after criticizing Fox News because its owner, Rupert Murdoch, gave $1 million donation to the Republican Governors Association. "Fox News has put its money where its mouth is," Olbermann said in an August segment that questioned the network's impartiality.

In October, Olbermann again raised the issue of Murdoch's donations, during an interview with Democratic Rep. James Clyburn. Olbermann asked whether there was "a legislative response to the idea that there is a national cable news outlet that goes beyond having a point of view and actually starts to shill for partisan causes and actually starts to donate to partisan groups of one party."

 
That's why I like driving down the middle; less trash there. Even I know better than get my news from MSNBC.
 
Still, Foxnews is a much better news organization.
 
There's a reason why I don't read the MSNBC Website.
Bias is bias, no matter the message. Like telling a young boy that WWE is fake, some people need to find the facts for themselves. It might take many years for some to realize they have been hoodwinked. The scary part is they have sponsors paying millions for what they expect will be news. And here they are making news themselves...
 
Bias is bias, no matter the message. Like telling a young boy that WWE is fake, some people need to find the facts for themselves. It might take many years for some to realize they have been hoodwinked. The scary part is they have sponsors paying millions for what they expect will be news. And here they are making news themselves...

Yep. Some people never make the effort though.
 
Bias is bias, no matter the message. Like telling a young boy that WWE is fake, some people need to find the facts for themselves. It might take many years for some to realize they have been hoodwinked. The scary part is they have sponsors paying millions for what they expect will be news. And here they are making news themselves...

:gpost:

The thing is all news is biased. Doesn't matter if it's got a liberal slant to it or a conservative one, it's still biased.

What I do is watch both Fox News AND CNN. This way I know what both sides are saying and I can form my OWN opinions. I know that they both are still going to be biased in their reporting, but it shouldn't matter if one is informed on an issue. You should be able to form your own opinions without being "fed" one way or the other.
 
The thing is all news is biased. Doesn't matter if it's got a liberal slant to it or a conservative one, it's still biased.

What I do is watch both Fox News AND CNN. This way I know what both sides are saying and I can form my OWN opinions.

I think I do something similar. I take a long look at all the stories after they are done "informing" me, and try to make some kind of logical sense out of it. A lot of my FoxNews comes from here at AD political threads, since it seems there are so many of them. CNN is biased a bit left, but there are worse options.
 
Give a shot and actually watch Foxnews, the news, sports, money, commentary, etc, instead of depending on AD for all of your Foxnews. Rather an odd way to form your opinion that way about Foxnews.
 
Give a shot and actually watch Foxnews, the news, sports, money, commentary, etc, instead of depending on AD for all of your Foxnews. Rather an odd way to form your opinion that way about Foxnews.
I have been there plenty. I find it entertaining. I find the forums here entertaining as well. I try to keep things on the softer side. And I do like Fox for NFL action.
 
I like Keith Olberman- I wish he still did sportcenter with Dan Patrick.....ahhhhh those were the days
 
I like Keith Olberman- I wish he still did sportcenter with Dan Patrick.....ahhhhh those were the days

Yes, they were a great team on that show. I never watch Sportscenter anymore. Too slow. Faster to get my sports fix online.
 
I never liked Keith Olberman. Dont' see his appeal. I put him on the same level as Sean Hannity/Orielly.

Lame.
 
One more thing, how is "suspend indefinitely" different from "fired" - if you're suspended indefinitely that means you'll never work so you're fired... so why bother to say, "suspended indefinitely" when "fired" is sufficient?
 
I think I do something similar. I take a long look at all the stories after they are done "informing" me, and try to make some kind of logical sense out of it. A lot of my FoxNews comes from here at AD political threads, since it seems there are so many of them. CNN is biased a bit left, but there are worse options.

Same here.

CNN seems to be the most neutral but I would not say it's 100% neutral.

I rarely ever post stuff from other sites that I read regularly that I as they are far more biased than CNN. Sometimes I will read Foxnews or BBC as well.

Recently I've been using google translator to read foreign news to get other's perpective.
 
One more thing, how is "suspend indefinitely" different from "fired" - if you're suspended indefinitely that means you'll never work so you're fired... so why bother to say, "suspended indefinitely" when "fired" is sufficient?

no. it means he is suspended for unspecified period of time. He can return back to work at later date but that's up to his boss. It's for legal reason such as benefits and unemployment benefits. When one is suspended, one cannot qualify for certain benefits. He also cannot apply for another job as well.

pretty harsh that he is indefinitely suspended without pay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top