there you go. any further is not needed. no but or if unless you're just cherry-picking around.
Just like you. You are well know not to answer questions put to you. And also come back with: I've already answered.
there you go. any further is not needed. no but or if unless you're just cherry-picking around.
That's VERY silliest post ever that I had seen.
No health insurance = 1% tax
Can't afford to buy health insurance = tax waived but you will covered under Medicaid or Medicare
Just like you. You are well know not to answer questions put to you. And also come back with: I've already answered.
What happen if state doesn't have DUI/DWI laws?
Every states have to follow federal regulation if they want receive federal highway funding, even they can refuse but they will lose the federal highway funding.
The state rights isn't in danger.
just because you asked a question doesn't mean it's a good question. or even coherent.
Nice deflect. I'l have to remember this post. It is your signature post from here out.
So your point is there should totally be no state laws and we should have only government laws for us all. You really bed to read the Constitution, real quick.
You have lost all your marbles.
Yes, Foxrac. It is fired up to seak the truth and make the truth known.
To bad you can not understand this. Perhaps you bed to step back and let others educate you about this subject. Personal knowledge, which I have tons of due to life experience, is something you have very little of. First step: Learn to respect your elders.
So your point is there should totally be no state laws and we should have only government laws for us all. You really bed to read the Constitution, real quick.
You have lost all your marbles.
You already lost your marbles when your post was very misleading which I corrected for you. That's why you've made no reply to my Post #72.
No health insurance = 1% tax
BUT, Foxrac, tell me where that money that = 1% comes from?
Perhaps you should check your dictionary on definition of "deflect" because your'e not using it correctly.
You already lost your marbles when your post was very misleading which I corrected for you. That's why you've made no reply to my Post #72.
Oh wow, what are wrong with you?
I have a lot of respect to elderly, especially Bebonang and I don't have much respect to ignorant people, especially YOU!
I was RAISED by LIBERAL parent for rest of my life and I learned A LOT OF THINGS from my parent about real world. I made my decision with political situation and you have no rights to make me so conservative or racist or teabagger. I violently DISAGREE with most conservative views and I expect you to respect my belief, if you don't then I don't respect you. Do not underestimate my life or my disabilities, especially LD and you NEVER know me in person.
I found your claim to be offended and I know about much more as you do and I'm adult, even I worked off my ass and paid taxes, made contribution to SS/Medicare. I'm not complained about goddamn income tax and it is better than in Canada or Europe. Everyone have different tastes and you do not need push your stuff in my throat. I'm too far from being lazy and I'm working on my bachelor degree right now.
I found your claim about political is extremely ignorant but you are protected under First Amendment and you are one of most difficult person that I had deal with it.
Now, don't say that I'm naive as excuse and you don't know about me, period.
You should know.
The answer is any source of INCOME TAX.
If you don't want 1% tax so time for you to get health insurance or Medicare.
This is not about you but about the folks who have no real personal income. You seem not to recognize these folks as being "problem children" of the hard workers of America. Of you are going to dish out offensive post, you better be prepared to get some offensive post that you don't care for back.
BUT, BUT, BUT...any person whom had no earnings (only entitlements) had NO INCOME TAX. So that 1% is covered by the hard working wage earners.
BUT, BUT, BUT...any person whom had no earnings (only entitlements) had NO INCOME TAX. So that 1% is covered by the hard working wage earners.
Is there a question mark in post #72? Did not think so. You owe me an apology
No problem. The American tax system is confusing and misleading to all of us.Oh, I got it now.
I'm apologized about made huge mistake because I haven't question you about FICA tax included in percent.