Pinky
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2008
- Messages
- 5,888
- Reaction score
- 0
Whoa, Babyface, Pinky was just asking, that's all. Quit jumping out making Pinky look like stupid.
Jillio think babyface is funny! They are mean!
Whoa, Babyface, Pinky was just asking, that's all. Quit jumping out making Pinky look like stupid.
Jillio think babyface is funny! They are mean!
Agreed.
Thank you for agree!
Just because someone has military experience, it doesn't mean they're a "warmonger."
You misinterpreted my post. I never say that military experience has do with warmonger. I only said that his war experience/war hero is not a qualification for the candidate president and explain why I beleive what candidate president is about, mean is for economy, healthcare, care of people, country, etc, not warmonger... which mean is President is not a warmonger...
That's an insulting stereotype.
I see different... I would agree that it´s an insult if I label war supporters or troops as a warmonger but it´s not an insult if I say that McCain or Bush is a warmonger because it´s fact that they try to start a war, not war supporters and troops ... McCain obsess the war issues and plan to do something with Iran and Russia... :Ohno:
In fact, people who have experienced war are more likely to avoid starting wars because they understand what war is like. But if war is necessary, they know what to do.
Yes I know. Many people beleive in protect our countries against terrorists, not start to attack other countries.
McCain believes in peace and freedom also. Sometimes war is the only way to get or maintain freedom.
If you mean Iraq, then I respectfully disagree. Did you know McCain deny to understand that Americans don't want to be in Iraq for 100 years either its a peaceful place or not?
"Quitting" and "peace" aren't the same thing.
I never say anything or compare quitting with peace but peace and freedom.
Whoa, Babyface, Pinky was just asking, that's all. Quit jumping out making Pinky look like stupid.
im not making anyone look stupid, that would be hard for me too do since the only person I really poke fun of is myself, since I know poking fun of others is really mean I never said pinky was stupid
I didn't say Iraq. I'm talking about any country that wants freedom. Without war and bloodshed the United States of America would not have become free from England....If you mean Iraq, then I respectfully disagree....
His war experience/war hero is not a qualification for the candidate president.
McCain have strong vote from here.
Hear that Obama is gonna to make some raise on tax to recovery the debt. *shurg*
I would like to know it would help US to fix but since of gas are high and business wouldn't appreciate that problem.
He will gonna levying more tax on rich people or upper class families but low and most of middle class families are unaffected.
For gas price, I had already explained in other thread.
Only thing it would be worry if raise more tax on high-class. Then there would be also AFFECT on job cut!
Obama will gonna levying more tax on rich people or upper class families but low and most of middle class families are unaffected.
For gas price, I had already explained in other thread.
How do you know that middle class wont be affected? I find it that middle class folks are the ones who are paying the greatest price.
Why you does care? Have a very huge debt is very bad and we aren't able to pay off in anytime.
I don't talking about compare with business and high class families, also job cut has been issue in last 7 years when USA was in recession since tax is still same as now, also rich people and high class families got more tax cut since low and middle class families aren't for much like that. Business tax is different from residential (low to high class families).
Look at Europe, tax is high and unemployment is under 10% in most developed countries then that's freaking not big deal, also high tax don't cause more job cut, not always.
Rich people is tend our source to get a job. That's my opinion. It may affect cut salary or benefit. Who know?
I didn't say Iraq. I'm talking about any country that wants freedom. Without war and bloodshed the United States of America would not have become free from England.
If you want to believe that Iraq could have become free of Saddam Hussein's control without any bloodshed, be my guest.
Again, silly lack of any logic from one who obviously dislikes the U.S., even though employed by it. It's known as "biting the hand that feeds you."
Naturally a strong, experienced candidate is wrong for such a mindset, and an inexperienced showboat kissing up to Europeans who want a weak U.S. is the best person.
Of course, that's just an opinion founded in the events of world history and currect events, not personal envy.