I don't waste my time with debating blog sites. Most people see them for what they are.
Oh, that means even CONSERVATIVE blogs are wasting your time too?
I don't waste my time with debating blog sites. Most people see them for what they are.
Oh, that means even CONSERVATIVE blogs are wasting your time too?
War isn't really cheap so early withdrawal from Afghan could cause a serious problem but unsure about Iraq because I noticed about Iraq has start stabilize right now.
Iraq and Afghanistan is part of the picture, but a very small part of the whole thing. It's a lose-lose battle in this case.
Vote Republicans, and you get programs that put a lot of money into sponsoring corporations, military, defence and other traditional neoliberal programs.
Vote Democrats and you get a lot of socialist programs like free daycare, inflated healthcare and so on. Nothing is wrong with either options, but it sucks only having to choose one or the other extreme during times where neither option has the best solution.
In bold, I'm sorry that I have disagree with you, I believe that we are manageable in Iraq and Afghan since Iraq is stabilizing and combative attack has went dropped from one year ago. For Afghan, it will take little long for this country to stabilize due last Bush Admin has focused in Iraq rather than Afghan so time for Obama to focus in Afghan.
Wow. My post went way over your head.
I am saying the wars are fragment of what is wrong with the deficit. It's a lose-lose situation because one cut spending in Sector A, but increase spending in Sector B. Literally, changes need to be made in every sector. Re-haul everything. Just no one got the guts to make such rapid changes to American society.
*facepalm*
Okay, I think that cut 2 wars would be big reduction in deficit but we are out of range to get away from 2 wars.
We're not talking about whether or not it's a good idea to withdraw or not. We're talking about the budget. So no face-palm needed.
I have a good reason to disagree with your stance on Afghanistan, but this topic is not about the moral issue of withdrawing from Afghanistan-- so I will spare you the history lecture.
I'm with soggy on this one. I don't support Obama on the war thing. I haven't heard of Klien but I'll have to check it out.
I think a lot of people on AllDeaf would hate what Ralphie did. Even the conservatives.
Iraq and Afghanistan is part of the picture, but a very small part of the whole thing. It's a lose-lose battle in this case.
Vote Republicans, and you get programs that put a lot of money into sponsoring corporations, military, defence and other traditional neoliberal programs.
Vote Democrats and you get a lot of socialist programs like free daycare, inflated healthcare and so on. Nothing is wrong with either options, but it sucks only having to choose one or the other extreme during times where neither option has the best solution.
I don't waste my time with debating blog sites. Most people see them for what they are.
Which Klein are yoiu referring to? The former Canadian Priemer Ralph Klien or Erza Klein or Lawrence Klein? I thought you were referring to an economist at first. I assume the former Canadian Preimar from your last post but I want to make sure.
You're missing the point. You should be able to refute the blog. You are putting a spin on it by saying you don't waste time with blog sites. So in a hindsight, you are avoiding them because you are not able to refute their claims.
No, spin would be posting a blog as fact in a debate. Pointing out that it is Salon is good enough.
If some want to trust that site that is their choice. Most see Salon for what it is. I chose to ignore Salon because it lacks credibility. That is MY choice.
Still missing the point. All you have to do is refute it if you believe it to be lacking in credibility. it's not that hard.
Still missing the point. All you have to do is refute it if you believe it to be lacking in credibility. it's not that hard.
Sometimes we believe that some things/places lack credibility without even looking.