Obama unveils record $3.8 trillion budget

Status
Not open for further replies.
This article explains so well:

The White House has proposed a $3.8-trillion budget for the fiscal year 2011, which begins Oct. 1. What is the projected deficit, and how does that compare with past years?

The deficit is estimated at $1.27 trillion in 2011 -- down from a record $1.56 trillion in the current year. The deficit -- the gap between budget outlays and tax receipts -- was $1.41 trillion in 2009, more than triple the previous high of $458.6 billion in 2008. Except for four years (1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001), the federal government has run a deficit consistently since 1970.

In the longer run, what are the deficit projections?

In the president's budget forecasts, the deficit would fall to $828 billion in fiscal 2012 and dip further to a decade low of $706 billion in 2014.

What's causing the trillion-dollar-plus deficits from fiscal years 2009 to 2011?

Despite widespread perceptions that economic stimulus spending and government bailouts of troubled financial institutions are largely behind the ballooning deficits, those temporary programs actually account for only a fraction of the budget shortfall.

The primary factors are long-standing imbalances between taxes and spending, plus the deep recession that reduced tax revenue and increased outlays for safety net programs such as unemployment insurance and food stamps.

With wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, spending for national defense has surged about 140% since 2000 -- to $722.1 billion projected in 2010. Government spending for Medicare has gone up even faster in the last decade, to $462.1 billion in 2010. At the same time, personal income taxes were cut earlier in the decade under the George W. Bush administration.

How does Obama's 2011 projected deficit compare? - latimes.com

Dick Cheney said, "deficits don't matter." Yea! Spend and burn!

"In our time, the Republican Party has compiled an impressive history of talking about fiscal responsibility while running up unrivaled deficits and debt. Of the roughly $11 trillion in federal debt accumulated to date, more than 90 percent can be attributed to the tenure of three presidents: Ronald Reagan, who used to complain constantly about runaway spending; George Herbert Walker Bush, reputed to be one of those old-fashioned green-eyeshade Republicans; and his spendthrift son George "Dubya" Bush, whose trillion-dollar war and irresponsible tax cuts accounted for nearly half the entire burden. Only Bill Clinton temporarily reversed the trend with surpluses and started to pay down the debt (by raising rates on the wealthiest taxpayers)."

Joe Conason - Salon.com
 
This article explains so well:

The White House has proposed a $3.8-trillion budget for the fiscal year 2011, which begins Oct. 1. What is the projected deficit, and how does that compare with past years?

The deficit is estimated at $1.27 trillion in 2011 -- down from a record $1.56 trillion in the current year. The deficit -- the gap between budget outlays and tax receipts -- was $1.41 trillion in 2009, more than triple the previous high of $458.6 billion in 2008. Except for four years (1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001), the federal government has run a deficit consistently since 1970.

In the longer run, what are the deficit projections?

In the president's budget forecasts, the deficit would fall to $828 billion in fiscal 2012 and dip further to a decade low of $706 billion in 2014.

What's causing the trillion-dollar-plus deficits from fiscal years 2009 to 2011?

Despite widespread perceptions that economic stimulus spending and government bailouts of troubled financial institutions are largely behind the ballooning deficits, those temporary programs actually account for only a fraction of the budget shortfall.

The primary factors are long-standing imbalances between taxes and spending, plus the deep recession that reduced tax revenue and increased outlays for safety net programs such as unemployment insurance and food stamps.

With wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, spending for national defense has surged about 140% since 2000 -- to $722.1 billion projected in 2010. Government spending for Medicare has gone up even faster in the last decade, to $462.1 billion in 2010. At the same time, personal income taxes were cut earlier in the decade under the George W. Bush administration.

How does Obama's 2011 projected deficit compare? - latimes.com

Dick Cheney said, "deficits don't matter." Yea! Spend and burn!

"In our time, the Republican Party has compiled an impressive history of talking about fiscal responsibility while running up unrivaled deficits and debt. Of the roughly $11 trillion in federal debt accumulated to date, more than 90 percent can be attributed to the tenure of three presidents: Ronald Reagan, who used to complain constantly about runaway spending; George Herbert Walker Bush, reputed to be one of those old-fashioned green-eyeshade Republicans; and his spendthrift son George "Dubya" Bush, whose trillion-dollar war and irresponsible tax cuts accounted for nearly half the entire burden. Only Bill Clinton temporarily reversed the trend with surpluses and started to pay down the debt (by raising rates on the wealthiest taxpayers)."

Joe Conason - Salon.com

Nice source.......Salon.con :roll:
 
It's depressing to hear how much tbe debt is going out of control....the war thing doesn't seem to end either.
 
[quote]The deficit -- the gap between budget outlays and tax receipts -- was $1.41 trillion in 2009, more than triple the previous high of $458.6 billion in 2008. Except for four years (1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001), the federal government has run a deficit consistently since 1970.

In the longer run, what are the deficit projections?

In the president's budget forecasts, the deficit would fall to $828 billion in fiscal 2012 and dip further to a decade low of $706 billion in 2014.[/quote]

Clever wording too. I guess by decade low he means in the 10's. But if not read carefully it sounds like he is saying in a decade. Which of course 2014 is only 6 years after 2008.
 
Nice source.......Salon.con :roll:

salon. a domain of gossips where it's full of effeminate people

if the source was from saloon.com... that would make it more believable :lol:
 
It's depressing to hear how much tbe debt is going out of control....the war thing doesn't seem to end either.

Be interesting to see if we are out of Iraq by August as promised. I am certain any money saved by ending the war will go toward spending and not toward the debt.
 
salon. a domain of gossips where it's full of effeminate people

if the source was from saloon.com... that would make it more believable :lol:

:lol: indeed
 
can you simply refute what salon.com said? Guess not.

I mean, seriously, where do you think all the deficit is coming from? Think.
 
salon. a domain of gossips where it's full of effeminate people

if the source was from saloon.com... that would make it more believable :lol:

bergling1.JPG


:giggle:
 
can you simply refute what salon.com said? Guess not.

I mean, seriously, where do you think all the deficit is coming from? Think.

I do think. And right now I am thinking a source like Salon.com isn't worthy of a response. I also think it is silly to back up an opinion with a blog as your support.

Now I am thinking I will have a beer :beer:
 
Oh, interesting and I will believe when I see it, thanks for sharing.
 
It's cases like this where I support a night-watchman state. I could care less about how they tax people, but.. I am afraid to say this, but I think America need someone with Klein's strategies. Governments will always have to tax people, but is all the programs out there really warrant bankrupting oneself if there's no surplus?

I'm with soggy on this one. I don't support Obama on the war thing. I haven't heard of Klien but I'll have to check it out.
 
Well, guess who SPENT the most? Republicans with absolutely no fiscal responsibility:

PresiddentialDebt.org

Thanks Bush and Reagan!

Also note that Clinton was a LOT more responsible with the debt and left office with a surplus.

Oh? Not even mention Franklin D. Roosevelt. They spend more in our century.

Spend more, bring more jobs and recover from sour economy to alive.

Obama cut, mean other business will losing.
 
I do think. And right now I am thinking a source like Salon.com isn't worthy of a response. I also think it is silly to back up an opinion with a blog as your support.

Now I am thinking I will have a beer :beer:

He asked you to refute what Salon said. So far, you're only disagreeing with it instead of refuting it.
 
I'm with soggy on this one. I don't support Obama on the war thing. I haven't heard of Klien but I'll have to check it out.

War isn't really cheap so early withdrawal from Afghan could cause a serious problem but unsure about Iraq because I noticed about Iraq has start stabilize right now.
 
He asked you to refute what Salon said. So far, you're only disagreeing with it instead of refuting it.

I don't waste my time with debating blog sites. Most people see them for what they are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top