I was merely trying to recap what you were saying. If it was illogical, it's either because your response was illogical or my understanding of it was wrong. You've had ample opportunity to correct me, but saying "that's illogical" tells me nothing.
I also explained how it was illogical. You simply chose to ignore the explanation.
By "32 questions" I meant every possible permutation of "How are <aggressors> using <method> to commit <violation> against <victims>?" Since there are 4 victims, 4 violations, 1 aggressor, and 2 methods, then 4x4x1x2=32, which means 32 possible questions. I'm sorry if I didn't make this clear before.
Thirty two would hardly cover every possible permutation.
If a bill called the "Social Policy Bill" went before congress, and the text was "It's obvious that there's social stratification, so the federal government shall implement social policies effective January 1, 2009", we would scratch our heads wondering what on earth that means (or so I would hope).
I stated "social policies." That is a plural. You are attempting to equate it to a singular, "Social Policy". That is where you are making your mistake.
Anyway, I tried to learn something from someone with a different perspective, but it's obvious that you have no interest in imparting your
wisdom, so I'll go elsewhere. Shegan jushyuseo gamsahamnida.
whoa. this is way beyond my pay grade and I wasn't a great student at my school
