neecy
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Messages
- 1,403
- Reaction score
- 2
gnulinuxman said:The point is that they are not the cure-all for deafness that many parents wish or want to think it is. Oh, and do you even know what a "straw man" fallacy is? (you've used it against me a number of times)So this "cochlear implants are not expensive" thing isn't a valid argument because it isn't true everywhere.It seems you want to "save" deaf kids from a "terrible world of silence" ASAP in this comment. How do you know that the kids who grew up with the cochlear implant from a young age weren't forced to be hearing? Maybe the ones who got it later in life didn't "benefit" because they didn't want it. Not everybody wants to hear. But, as the saying goes "Hook 'em early, and you got them for life."How about her siblings? I know some people who got their implants after they were old enough to decide and do really well with them.
If you'd actually TALK to the parents of implanted children (there are several here you know) you'd know that the #1 reason behind implanting early is NOT to "save a chld from a terrible world of silence" but to give them the benefit of linguistic communication, which is EASIEST when done early. The children implanted are STILL deaf. Nobody denies that. You need to stop and realize that aproximately 90% (or more?) of deaf children are born to HEARING families. Its natural for them to want their children to be able to interact with the hearing (and the deaf) worlds.
You keep meantioning "being forced to hear"....as if hearing is a bad/abusive thing? I've never known hearing to hurt anybody.