- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 44,482
- Reaction score
- 448
So, why can't Muslims have a moment of violence?
For a long time in history, particularly under the Ottomon Empire, the Muslims were more tolerant than their Christian counterparts. If Christians are allowed to have violent history due to it "being in the past," why is it not relevant to now?
I smell double standards.
Of course it's not acceptable, but comon, to accuse an entire group of doing something while ignoring your own history?
You never understand about 9/11 and Ft. Hood shooting, it happened inside US so you are Canadian and you just don't care because it don't happen to your country, go read my post about our concern regards on muslim, also check Steel's post too since he's from US. We have very bad reaction to muslim after 9/11, it was big time so I don't give a damn if someone like you or Loghead label me or others as ignorant so say ignorant isn't value.
I will NEVER change after read your post, even you still don't understand our concern with muslim so if you have relative or families whoever get killed in terrorist attack by Al Qaeda so you will going be same way like us does.