Mitt Romney Budget Cuts Would Have Severe Consequences

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grayma said:
Yes. We can tell. It's kind of sad that you can't recognize their biases, but at least it's better than the Kos Kids.
Click to expand...

How? Every media have their own bias and why are you sad about me. You should know about my overall political views.

If you are conservative so feel free to not read The Huffington Post whatever you want.
 
Anyone remember that Obama does not have a budget? Probably won't have one at all this year...and that is a violation of the Constitution.
 
TXgolfer said:
Exactly



An outline for a plan? That is what he based these assumptions on? Interesting



It shows.
Click to expand...

You have to answer the question that you asked for.

I PMed you and explained about my political view so no excuse if you say like that.

Oh, I love CNN as well.
 
rolling7 said:
Anyone remember that Obama does not have a budget? Probably wont have one at all this year...and that is a violation of the Constitution.
Click to expand...

What hell are you talking about?
 
Foxrac said:
You have to answer the question that you asked for.

I PMed you and explained about my political view so no excuse if you say like that.

Oh, I love CNN as well.
Click to expand...

I have my political views as well. But I can recognize propaganda when I see it.
 
Don't choke but Obama had to present a budget to Congress before Congress can do anything. And after he does, he needs to fight for HIS budget!
 
rolling7 said:
Don't choke but Obama had to present a budget to Congress before Congress can do anything. And after he does, he needs to fight for HIS budget!
Click to expand...

He did but the congress said no...
 
Foxrac said:
He did but the congress said no...
Click to expand...

And you are correct. Congress said no because Obama wanted to raise taxes AND raise spending. Congress is willing to go along with a little bit of tax increase AND a little bit of spending cut. Then Obama said no.
 
rolling7 said:
And you are correct. Congress said no because Obama wanted to raise taxes AND raise spending. Congress is willing to go along with a little bit of tax increase AND a little bit of spending cut. Then Obama said no.
Click to expand...

Incorrect, Obama wants combined of tax increase and spending cut (especially defense) but house of rep said no. Both of sides disagree left as impasses.

If you think it is violation of US constitution so feel free to challenge in the court. I don't see everything like that.
 
Forbes....4/14/2011
Obama's Budget Speech Frames the Debate for 2012

"what Obama is proposing is to raise federal taxes well above the long term historical average, even more healy focused on the nation's employers and investors, to pay for much more federal spending wel above long term historical average,"


CNN Politics.....2/13/2012
President Obama Unveils $3.8 Trillion Budget

"President Obama unveiled a $3.8 trillion budget request Monday, that hikes taxes on the rich, spends new money on infrastructures and education, but does little to reform the entitlement programs that pose the biggest long-term threat to the Federal budget."
 
rolling7 said:
Forbes....4/14/2011
Obama's Budget Speech Frames the Debate for 2012

"what Obama is proposing is to raise federal taxes well above the long term historical average, even more healy focused on the nation's employers and investors, to pay for much more federal spending wel above long term historical average,"


CNN Politics.....2/13/2012
President Obama Unveils $3.8 Trillion Budget

"President Obama unveiled a $3.8 trillion budget request Monday, that hikes taxes on the rich, spends new money on infrastructures and education, but does little to reform the entitlement programs that pose the biggest long-term threat to the Federal budget."
Click to expand...

Education and infrastructure are very important, IMO and the defense should be focused at our county, not other goddamn countries, IMO.

I'm favor tax increase as well.
 
Foxrac said:
Education and infrastructure are very important, IMO and the defense should be focused at our county, not other goddamn countries, IMO.

I'm favor tax increase as well.
Click to expand...

Do you favor cutting entitlement programs also? The reason I ask is because Obama wants to spend more, much more, on entitlements.
 
rolling7 said:
Do you favor cutting entitlement programs also? The reason I ask is because Obama wants to spend more, much more, on entitlements.
Click to expand...

No, the entitlement programs should be well funded.

Ronmey doesn't want change in SS or Medicare either.
 
Foxrac said:
Education and infrastructure are very important, IMO and the defense should be focused at our county, not other goddamn countries, IMO.

I'm favor tax increase as well.
Click to expand...

Then you can pay for my tax increase!
 
Foxrac said:
No, the entitlement programs should be well funded.

Ronmey doesn't want change in SS or Medicare either.
Click to expand...

Entitlement programs are what is killing this country morally and economically! In some cases it even keeps racism alive and well! Lazy people feeding off of you and I provided through government assistance. Hear me correct here before you spew! I realize that some people really do need assistance and I have no problem with them at all. It's the freeloaders that I can't handle anymore!
 
Foxrac said:
No, you need pay fair share of taxes.
Click to expand...

I already do and then some! We are double and triple taxed as taxpaying Americans. Oh, I should make it clear, the ones of us that already are and have been paying our taxes all along!

Sales tax, personal property tax, real estate tax, income tax, etc....!!!!
 
airportcop said:
Entitlement programs are what is killing this country morally and economically! In some cases it even keeps racism alive and well! Lazy people feeding off of you and I provided through government assistance. Hear me correct here before you spew! I realize that some people really do need assistance and I have no problem with them at all. It's the freeloaders that I can't handle anymore!
Click to expand...

I disagree if you know about fiscal works. I'm not saying that entitlement programs should be overfunded but just need be well funded, if so then no change is needed, if overfunded then just reduce the funds to meet well funds.

I disagree with you again about freeloaders and my sister doesn't get ANY of welfare - no Medicaid, no food stamp, NOTHING and she doesn't have job at all because it is extremely hard to find a job now. She's just live with family and she just got little allowance from her family. It is very hard to get welfare programs due to strict criteria and income limit. There are many people that I know hate welfare programs a lot and they want get a job so really badly.

The welfare programs in America sucks and there are millions of people rather to have a job. There is HUGE drawback is expensive private health insurances and I know some people rather to have Medicaid over private health insurance.

Look, I'm not eligible for Medicaid and food stamp anymore. I'm current college student who on semester break due to medical condition. I have deal with costly medical care under private health insurance.

That's FREAKING not freeloader!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top