Lies about CI's

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then why, when a parent says that they disagree with the majority, they are told that they are disregarding deaf people's experiences? I have even said that while I have heard plenty of people against oral only, that I have met and spoken to plenty who support it as well. I am told that I'm an idiot, that I'm making it up, and on and on. Just because some deaf people have the same opinion does not mean all do, and it certainly does not mean that those who disagree are in denial, or audist, or any other insult that people will throw around.

If it was said anywhere as nicely as that, you'd get more cooperation. But since your attitude has been on the perm-negative.... You're likely to get resistance. Just a thought :)
 
Then why, when a parent says that they disagree with the majority, they are told that they are disregarding deaf people's experiences? I have even said that while I have heard plenty of people against oral only, that I have met and spoken to plenty who support it as well. I am told that I'm an idiot, that I'm making it up, and on and on. Just because some deaf people have the same opinion does not mean all do, and it certainly does not mean that those who disagree are in denial, or audist, or any other insult that people will throw around.

A hearing person telling us our reality simply rubs us the wrong way.
 
Er, um, no. Deaf people did NOT invent captioning. They were merely one of the many millions of people with hearing loss. There are more deaf and hard of hearing people that there are Deaf people. Need to remember that. The technology of the time on the invention of captioning was done by, again, hearing people. They had the technical knowledge, the means, the resources and the money to do the job. Simply put the technology back then was ready for implementation to begin meeting communication access needs of people with hearing loss. A public television station, WGBH, actually invented closed captioning in the early 1970s. They came up with the "Caption Center" which was established in 1972. It took a team of engineers to develop captioning access to television for the deaf and hard of hearing people. You can thank Julia Child with her French Chef program that started the ball rolling on closed captioning back in 1972. How many of ya'll were born after 1972 anyway??
The story of captioning as a service for people who are deaf or hard of hearing began on August 5, 1972, when Julia Child, The French Chef, taught viewers to make a special chicken recipe. This broadcast from WGBH studios in Boston has been immortalized not because of the exquisite entrée, but because of its significance to communication. The French Chef provided Americans who are deaf and hard of hearing their first opportunity to enjoy the audio portion of a national television program through the use of open captions.

The Public Broadcasting System (PBS), with federal funding, took the lead in captioning broadcast programming in the 1970s. The Caption Center, a service of WGBH Boston, captioned programs such as The Captioned ABC News, a late-night rebroadcast carried by more than 190 PBS stations, and Zoom, a children's series.

The first demonstration of closed captioning took place in 1971 at the National Conference on Television for the Hearing Impaired in Nashville, Tennessee. Successful testing prompted the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to set aside line 21 for the transmission of closed captions in 1976. PBS and the Caption Center received federal funding to develop caption-editing consoles that would be used to caption prerecorded programs, encoding equipment that broadcasters and others would use to add captions to their programs, and prototype decoders.

On March 16, 1980, the National Captioning Institute broadcast the first closed captioned television series. Programs such as The ABC Sunday Night Movie, The Wonderful World of Disney, and Masterpiece Theater whetted the appetites of audience members for more captioned television. IBM became the first company to closed caption its commercials. The following year, closed captions spread to home videos. In 1982, realtime captioning hit the scene during live broadcasts of the Sugar Bowl and the Academy Awards. Early captioning efforts were laborious and costly because there were few commercial tools available for captioning.

Two laws significantly impacted the spread of captioning. The Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990 mandated that by mid-1993 all new television sets 13 inches or larger manufactured for sale in the U.S. must contain caption decoding technology. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 required that "video programming first published or exhibited after the effective date of such regulations is fully accessible through the provision of closed captions." The 1996 Act empowered the FCC to interpret and enforce it. The FCC mandated an eight-year phase-in starting on January 1, 1998, for captioning of "new" programming (programs that air for the first time after the ruling takes effect). By January 1, 2006, 95 percent of all new television programming must be captioned. The FCC did not create a phase-in for "old" programming, but required that by January 1, 2006, 75 percent of programming that originally aired before the Act must be captioned.

Developments in technology have both facilitated captioning and challenged it to grow in new directions. The Caption Center collaborated with Microsoft to make the CD-ROM encyclopedia Encarta 98 accessible in 1997. The Caption Center also developed a software utility that allows realtime staff to send simultaneous data streams for closed captioning and web site URLs for the benefit of WebTV users. Many captioning companies are working hard to ensure that Digital Television has high-quality captioning.

In a relatively short period of time, the demand for captioning has driven its availability from a few television programs to a ubiquitous service in various media. Captioning is now provided for movies, television programs, videos, musical and theater performances, lectures, government proceedings, planetarium shows, meetings and conferences. The demand for captioned programming of all kinds should drive science centers and museums to utilize this service to tap into the responsive and powerful market of visitors who are hard of hearing or deaf.

ASTC - Resource Center - Accessible Practices - Best Practices - Captioning

http://www.dcmp.org/caai/nadh147.pdf


What's next? Credit the invention of texting on phones to Deaf people, too?
 
Er, um, no. Deaf people did NOT invent captioning. They were merely one of the many millions of people with hearing loss. There are more deaf and hard of hearing people that there are Deaf people. Need to remember that. The technology of the time on the invention of captioning was done by, again, hearing people. They had the technical knowledge, the means, the resources and the money to do the job. Simply put the technology back then was ready for implementation to begin meeting communication access needs of people with hearing loss. A public television station, WGBH, actually invented closed captioning in the early 1970s. They came up with the "Caption Center" which was established in 1972. It took a team of engineers to develop captioning access to television for the deaf and hard of hearing people. You can thank Julia Child with her French Chef program that started the ball rolling on closed captioning back in 1972. How many of ya'll were born after 1972 anyway??


ASTC - Resource Center - Accessible Practices - Best Practices - Captioning

http://www.dcmp.org/caai/nadh147.pdf


What's next? Credit the invention of texting on phones to Deaf people, too?
Wow... I never said invent. lol. The law is there because of NAD..
 
Wirelessly posted

Beowulf said:
Then why, when a parent says that they disagree with the majority, they are told that they are disregarding deaf people's experiences? I have even said that while I have heard plenty of people against oral only, that I have met and spoken to plenty who support it as well. I am told that I'm an idiot, that I'm making it up, and on and on. Just because some deaf people have the same opinion does not mean all do, and it certainly does not mean that those who disagree are in denial, or audist, or any other insult that people will throw around.

A hearing person telling us our reality simply rubs us the wrong way.

you guys are just as nasty to the deaf people who disagree with you.
 
There are more deaf and hard of hearing people that there are Deaf people. Need to remember that.

What's next? Credit the invention of texting on phones to Deaf people, too?

I'm not sure what's up with the labeling. why such hostile attitude toward "Deaf people"?

they're all same to me - deaf :dunno:
 
ADA, Deaf rights, etc ... all by the culturally deaf...

ASL versions of websites is starting now.. because of the culturally deaf..

Our phones are much more advanced than the hearing population.... Why?? Oh yea, the culturally deaf too.

many more things in the works too.

now what have your people done?

Contributed to the massive profits of the professionals... yep.

Web-captioning by Google was headed by a culturally Deaf programmer.
 
Wow... I never said invent. lol. The law is there because of NAD..

True. Yet it took them and others years to have a proven concept of CC to pave way of other laws and regulations (e.g. FCC Authorization Act of 1983, Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990, etc). The FCC Authorizaton Act of 1983 specifically designed to help expedite the development of new technology and then seven years later closed captioning for the hearing impaired. There were certain groundworks that were laid out that led to greater and greater CC opportunities. The 1990 Act pointed out the facts as a selling point that there were "24 million deaf and hard of hearing citizens (38 percent of whom are elderly); 3 to 4 million people learning English as a second language; 27 to 29 million American adults who are functionally illiterate; and millions of children who are learning to read." (Read: The Communication Act: a legislative history of the major amendments, 1934 - 1996 by Max d. Paglin, et al). What was also realized that 98% of all American homes had television sets as well as Harkin pointed out. So, this captioning effort wasn't just solely a Deaf push but people with hearing loss of all kinds and of all ages, as well as those who are learning the English language.

There were advocates on behalf of Deaf people who testified at those hearings. There were advocates on behalf of deaf and hard of hearing people who testified at those hearings. There were advocates on behalf of people learning a 2nd language who testified at those hearings. There were advocates on behalf of young children learning how to read who testified at those hearings.
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OSEC/library/legislative_histories/1397.pdf
 
And it took 38 years to get to that point when closed captioning began.

And after a decade and a half of video-streaming Internet technology. Inexcusable.

And yes, I do remember watching RealMedia broadcasts in 1998 or 1999. If I wanted to know what was being said, I had to wait until a pirate create hardcoded fansubs for those broadcasts.
 
And after a decade and a half of video-streaming Internet technology. Inexcusable.

And yes, I do remember watching RealMedia broadcasts in 1998 or 1999. If I wanted to know what was being said, I had to wait until a pirate create hardcoded fansubs for those broadcasts.

Yet the speed and bandwidth had to catch up to get good quality videos. Plus the infrastructure had to be built around that internet technology to catch up as well. It wasn't until the mid-2000s when people began to use high speed internet connection and away from landlines.

Technological maturity and education take awhile when it comes to making captioning available to everybody.
 
My HAs doctor says "HAs is better than CIs" and he suggested me not to get CIs. His opinion says, "CIs is no good". I agreed with him. Better old fashion "HAs". I met someone with CIs and not happy about it.

I refuse to get CIs because I am afraid of the operation on the back of the skull in the pic AHHHHHH!.
sagittal_CI.jpg


And It looks kinda funny and kinda big which can be seen obviously.
cochlear-implant-small.jpg
 
Yet the speed and bandwidth had to catch up to get good quality videos. Plus the infrastructure had to be built around that internet technology to catch up as well. It wasn't until the mid-2000s when people began to use high speed internet connection and away from landlines.
and yet.... this is 2010 with broadband technology and still no CC? why did it take Obama to sign the legislation to mandate it?

Technological maturity and education take awhile when it comes to making captioning available to everybody.
um..... no? If they're able to broadcast video online... they can easily broadcast CC together with the video. It's simple, really.... but they didn't implement the CC feature for Internet broadcast and I will explain why.

A few years ago - I emailed a complaint to CNN to make their videos deaf-accessible. A man replied back. He apologized profusely and understood my frustration. He explained that it was a matter of bureaucratic legal issue regarding copyrights and the ownership of text.

It took Google and a deaf man to break the barrier. And then Obama to mandate it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top