Beach girl
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2011
- Messages
- 3,767
- Reaction score
- 8
It's a women's choice on whether or not to have an abortion. Having an ultra sound isn't going to change the fact that a woman is not in a stable or good place in her life to go through a pregnancy/birth. As for people who look at it from the fetus's point of view, I don't know if that's even fair. A heart beat and brain waves aren't present until week 6, and if no heart beat and no brain waves is how doctors know someone is dead then... yeah...I don't have anymore facts to go on than that about pregnancy. But, I say women have been pretty good at knowing when it's just not time to have a baby and dealing with an unwanted pregnancy since the dawn of time so what should be the focal point is making it safe. Let's not go back to the times of wire hangers/abandoned babies on doorsteps.
(sorry for the long post)
You're on kind of shaky ground there, if you are using "absence of heart beat and brain waves" to justify abortion. Most women are only just figuring out they are pregnant at the point of 4 to 6 weeks' gestation. If after that the heart beat and brain waves are present, then aren't they actually killing a living being, after that?
Actually I think the law has done a pretty good job of figuring out how to live within most people's moral parameters. First 3 months, no questions asked, basically; next 3 months, gets increasingly complex; final 3 months, generally abortions only allowed in very extreme circumstances (like life-threatening to mother, or baby has conditions "incompatible with life" that will cause it to die soon after birth).
That sounds about right to me, personally.