marvmiller said:Laurent has a master plan developed from a week long planning session with 15 professional architects and planners as well as about 15 deaf and hard of hearing and hearing signers attending.
We are currently waiting for our funding to close. It has been delayed several times rather significantly, and we hope to see the funding close by end of this month.
As for allowing "anyone" to live in Laurent, sure. Keep in mind, "anyone" can not run for public office, run a business or provide service if they do not know or use sign language. This is a PLANNED community -- that fact alone sets us apart from Martha's Vineyard. Yet, we use them as a model showing that it is possible to have a very healthy community based on sign language, regardless of one's hearing skills.
My point about 1 in 25 people being deaf on the island was that everyone seems to expect we must have deaf majority in Laurent in order to have an effective signing community. This is not true. Yet, we have 60% deaf adults on our reservation list. 40% are hearing. This number is reversed for children. We have 158 people on the reservation list.
Assuming the funding is in place by end of this month, we will be able to break ground in spring of 2007. We need about 8 to 12 months for engineering work for infrastructure (sewer, water, roads, electricity, gas and telecommunications). We hope to have the first families be able to move in by spring 2008.
Marvin
You know what they say about "the best laid plans of........", I still think it is still idealistic, and question, the need for such a town. As everyone in the entire deaf and other loss communities are campaigning day and night for access to the mainstream/hearing world, this just seems a 'protectionist and Isolationist' an approach to access. Greta Garbo would be proud of that attitude, I question deaf people will go for it.
I've read the reservation list (And the UK ones who are keeping BOTH options open by keeping their UK homes too !), oh ye of little faith springs to mind. Deaf people realise their futures are NOT in planned communities but in access to 'out there', to artificially create 'ideal' environments is not going to work, as always these things ignore human nature. Is it NOT for deaf people who cannot cope with mainstream anyway ? We should be helping them cope, not sticking them in the back of beyond in a town somewhere.
The idea is OK to give some sectors priority, but it doesn't in practice work. There are now serious questions over the Validity of Gallaudet, and there are a grouping of cultural deaf there, a semblence of whathappens when you give one sector of deaf people the higher priority, they look down on others !