- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 143
Wanting the child not to be held back by peers. (Parents hoping to raise a prodigy.)
hhhmmmm I don't think you can "hope" to raise a prodigy. The kid needs to be born a prodigy.
Wanting the child not to be held back by peers. (Parents hoping to raise a prodigy.)
hhhmmmm I don't think you can "hope" to raise a prodigy. The kid needs to be born a prodigy.
I do say, you have excellent points.
Jiro has some good points
Bullying was another reason
Religious reasons was another.
Any more?
![]()
hhhmmmm I don't think you can "hope" to raise a prodigy. The kid needs to be born a prodigy.
Sometimes their kids need accommodations a school can't provide.
exactly. giftedness cannot be developed. it is inate.
this just reminds me of when I would have piano recitals and there would be parents there videotaping their four-year-old playing some technically complex Beethoven piece. All I could think was, love your child for who s/he is, not for what s/he does!
Parents were constantly travelling--so that is how we were homeschooled.
this is yet another example of how some parents live vicariously through their children. it's sad, but true. having said that, it's not only parents of gifted children who do this -- parents of average children do this as well.
I think gift can be developed. For example, my friend is gifted at languages, and many people consider me to be gifted at languages. But I have had many more opportunities to work on my languages, so I am more fluent in a larger number than her. However she and I both have the gift--but I got the chance to develop my further. Sorry I don't mean to brag I am just using that as an example.
The issue I have with parents trying to make a prodigy out of their kid is it sends the message "we'll only love you if you are exceptional." If the kid goes to the parents and asks to have the opportunity to develop his/her gift, that's another story. But this just reminds me of when I would have piano recitals and there would be parents there videotaping their four-year-old playing some technically complex Beethoven piece. All I could think was, love your child for who s/he is, not for what s/he does!
I suppose that once the parents recognize the gift... they'll have to homeschool the kid to specifically nurture that gift. One could say that it is bad idea because in doing so - that kid will not be well-rounded but then... what prodigal person is ever well-rounded? I don't know if this is actually true for most but IMO - a prodigy tends to be asshole or exhibits an "elitist" attitude.
So I suppose the toughest job in raising a prodigy is to make him/her likeable and sociable.
There are definitely prodigies that are likable and sociable. The 18-year-old professor Alia Sabur comes to mind. She is also slightly more well-rounded than the average prodigy. <laugh>
Maybe some parents want a child prodigy just so they can have a Wiki on their kid. <wink>
but the prodigy is the one who is internationally recognized for his/her gift and that is the one whose name lasts for a long time in the history book... and also have wikipedia information LOL
Does anyone see the purpose of this thread?
Please remove your link.
Does anyone see the purpose of this thread?
Please remove your link.
I agree.i believe giftedness can be nurtured, but it cannot be created.
Even prodigies have to practice a lot. For example, Bill Gates had more than 10,000 hours of practice with writing programs before he started Microsoft. The Beatles practiced more than 10,000 hours in Hamburg, Germany, which helped them being much better at playing together. There's no question prodigies have innate ability, but they also put in a lot of hours of hard work and practice.
I was just using my example with languages to show that excelling in something is a combination of innate ability, opportunity, and work. I agree with you that being gifted and being a prodigy aren't the same thing.