- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 323
I think so, yes. Through educating and supporting their parents.
So what is your envision of the future deaf generation?
I think so, yes. Through educating and supporting their parents.
So if your deaf or hoh child prefers to use spoken language, that is ok with you? You would have no problem with dropping sign?
So what is your envision of the future deaf generation?
I think you have misinterpreted Wokomaku's post, and my reply.
I believe there are kids with a hearing loss who are still auditory learners.
Parents who can communicate with their children, they feel welcome at home. Kids who graduate from high school as well educated as hearing kids, many are able to go to college. They are able to have the jobs they want. They feel included in all of society.
What do you base this belief on?
Sounds like a case in point for the use of ASL.
Children I have observed. Why do you assume they can't be? If a child is amplified appropriately at a young age their brains develop auditory pathways like a hearing child, if not, and a visual language is used, those pathways turn visual. So, if given support, they can use those pathways.
Parents who can communicate with their children, they feel welcome at home. Kids who graduate from high school as well educated as hearing kids, many are able to go to college. They are able to have the jobs they want. They feel included in all of society.
That is what I have spent the last 10 years of my life working on..it is a lot harder than said...a lot harder.
Are you trained in assessment of learning style? Cognitive psychology and educational psychology, and neuro-psychology would disagree with your conclusions.
You disagree with the research that shows that children implanted very young have brains more similar to hearing children than profoundly deaf ASL users?
You said that your assessments were based on children u have observed.
You disagree with the research that shows that children implanted very young have brains more similar to hearing children than profoundly deaf ASL users?
What research would that be, faire_jour?
Indeed, it now appears that regardless of whether their parents are deaf or hearing, deaf children who are better readers turn out to be the ones who had their hearing losses diagnosed earlier, had early access to fluent language (usually via sign language), and were exposed to English. At the same time, having a mother who is a good signer appears to be more important than whether she is deaf or hearing or the precise age at which a chld learns to sign, as long as it is early.
From conclusions based on years of research by Marc Marshark, et.al.
http://www.alldeaf.com/deaf-news/61...eaf-children-but-not-others-good-readers.html
But not always. If a child is given a CI early and given a fluent language model, they would fall into that catagory, correct?
No. Did you read the statement completely? The most important variable is sign.