Irony of ironies, Gore's hometown Nashville Breaks 1877 Cold Temp Record...

Status
Not open for further replies.
sequoias said:
You really sure about that, Jiro? Have you been reading newspapers a lot on the subways daily? lol
Click to expand...

And you wonder where people get these myths about global warming as caused by man? For one, the media purposefully use the word "hole" in "ozone hole" for scary effect when there is in fact no hole at all. Just a thinning layer of ozone that thickens and thins over time. Secondly, this "ozone hole" was first measured in 1956 way before the "ozone destroying" CFCs (refridgerant) were in common use. It goes like clockwork, just like global warming only on a much shorter time scale. The "hole" appears at the end after a long dark, cold Antarctic winter, lasts about three to five weeks, and then this "hole" slowly disappears. None of the permanent depletion of the ozone layer. Kind of makes you wonder about the science lately, eh?

ozone_hole_plot-thumb.png


Note NASA's use of the word "hole," too. Great PR stuff to boot! But as you can see, this "hole" disappears every year like clockwork.
 
Global Warming: Medieval Era Hotter than Today

Here is an article talking about warm periods throughout history and that
According to Prof Stott, the evidence also undermines doom-laden predictions about the effect of higher global temperatures. "During the Medieval Warm Period, the world was warmer even than today, and history shows that it was a wonderful period of plenty for everyone.
Click to expand...

The middle ages was a time of global warming more than now.
 
Kokonut, I say the Sun had changed 60 times in our period. When I said "times" I don't mean the "x" in the math, even there are no "s" at the ending of the "time" for the "x" in the math, but I added "s" at the ending of "times" which mean how many times the Sun have changed by .00000001 in our period, the human's period.

So that make 60 times that Sun grew by .00000001 in our period. It could be even more in those periods before the human ever existed.
 
PuyoPiyo said:
Kokonut, I say the Sun had changed 60 times in our period. When I said "times" I don't mean the "x" in the math, even there are no "s" at the ending of the "time" for the "x" in the math, but I added "s" at the ending of "times" which mean how many times the Sun have changed by .00000001 in our period, the human's period.

So that make 60 times that Sun grew by .00000001 in our period. It could be even more in those periods before the human ever existed.
Click to expand...

Again, you're not making any sense, mathematically nor in the conventional sense. Are you saying the sun expanded by 60 times it's size over 100 years? It has gotten 60 times bigger in 100 years? Exactly what has changed are you talking about then?
 
kokonut said:
Again, you're not making any sense, mathematically nor in the conventional sense. Are you saying the sun expanded by 60 times it's size over 100 years? It has gotten 60 times bigger in 100 years? Exactly what has changed are you talking about then?
Click to expand...

It does not make sense because you are not reading my English properly. I am not talking about the mathematic, but how many times had the Sun grew in our period.

*edit* It is not about the size, neither, but the grew.
 
PuyoPiyo said:
It does not make sense because you are not reading my English properly. I am not talking about the mathematic, but how many times had the Sun grew in our period.

*edit* It is not about the size, neither, but the grew.
Click to expand...
You're not making sense in writing your English or conveying your thoughts correctly. The sun grew 60 times in our period you'd say? What exactly grew? Based on what? The "grew" part does not say nor explain anything. It's gobblygook. The sun's mass grew? The energy output grew? The sun's brightness grew? The sun's hydrogen burn rate grew? What grew?
 
kokonut said:
You're not making sense in writing your English or conveying your thoughts correctly. The sun grew 60 times in our period you'd say? What exactly grew? Based on what? The "grew" part does not say nor explain anything. It's gobblygook. The sun's mass grew? The energy output grew? The sun's brightness grew? The sun's hydrogen burn rate grew? What grew?
Click to expand...

The sun itself grew. Simple.

You are the one who couldn't understand the English or even what I am trying to say. I don't mention the size of Sun at all, except the grew.
 
PuyoPiyo said:
The sun itself grew. Simple.

You are the one who couldn't understand the English or even what I am trying to say. I don't mention the size of Sun at all, except the grew.
Click to expand...

I understood what you were talking about. I think someone here's a fake know it all that couldn't read your English.
 
PuyoPiyo said:
The sun itself grew. Simple.

You are the one who couldn't understand the English or even what I am trying to say. I don't mention the size of Sun at all, except the grew.
Click to expand...

Exactly what about the sun that grew if it's not the size? The brightness grew? The energy level grew? Saying "the sun grew" doesn't mean or describe anything at all. What unit are we talking about? Is in meters? Feet? Pascal? Joules? A unitless number? Is it about volume size? The circumference grew? What? What you're saying is like saying it this way:

A:"I grew."
B:"You grew what?"
A:"Me, that grew"
B: "You grew"
A: "Yes, I grew."
B: "You got bigger?"
A: "No, I just grew. 60 time."
B: "Grew what? You grew a beard 60 times? Grew smarter?"
A: "No. Read my English carefully, I grew."
B" Okkkayyy. Exactly what grew? You got taller, right?"
A: "No. Read my lips, I grew."
B: "Is this something that can be measured with tangible results?"
A: "I don't what you're saying but obviously you are not reading correctly my English. I didn't grow taller, heavier, or fatter, I just grew. 60 time."

Grow what, P?
 
sequoias said:
I understood what you were talking about. I think someone here's a fake know it all that couldn't read your English.
Click to expand...

Thank you, Sequoias. :)

kokonut said:
Exactly what about the sun that grew if it's not the size? The brightness grew? The energy level grew? Saying "the sun grew" doesn't mean or describe anything at all. What unit are we talking about? Is in meters? Feet? Pascal? Joules? A unitless number? Is it about volume size? The circumference grew? What? What you're saying is like saying it this way:

A:"I grew."
B:"You grew what?"
A:"Me, that grew"
B: "You grew"
A: "Yes, I grew."
B: "You got bigger?"
A: "No, I just grew. 60 time."
B: "Grew what? You grew a beard 60 times? Grew smarter?"
A: "No. Read my English carefully, I grew."
B" Okkkayyy. Exactly what grew? You got taller, right?"
A: "No. Read my lips, I grew."
B: "Is this something that can be measured with tangible results?"
A: "I don't what you're saying but obviously you are not reading correctly my English. I didn't grow taller, heavier, or fatter, I just grew. 60 time."

Grow what, P?
Click to expand...

Go back to the picture that I shared to you. Growing can be relative of the size, but the size might not be bigger, but also others as well. It is complication of the growing system of the Sun. The bottom line is that the Sun is growing including everything what the Sun have itself.

This is my final clarification of my words and I will not reply any further.
 
Jiro said:
lol sorry! but your answer's... confusing me lol :dizzy:
Click to expand...

Well my answers are based on what I saw on the picture that I shared and the link from Wikipedia that I provide here.
 
PuyoPiyo said:
Thank you, Sequoias. :)



Go back to the picture that I shared to you. Growing can be relative of the size, but the size might not be bigger, but also others as well. It is complication of the growing system of the Sun. The bottom line is that the Sun is growing including everything what the Sun have itself.

This is my final clarification of my words and I will not reply any further.
Click to expand...

I get what you are saying, and this makes much more sense to me than the rambling from Koknut.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top