Iran will do military exercise on how to close Strait of Hormuz

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think it is speculation that they want to. I think it is speculation that they could/would actually do it.

They are also supposed to be placing ships in the Panama Canal, but unless they get help from South America they don't have the logistical ability to keep them there.

The Chinese.
Hello!
 
Maybe we can ask nicely to Iran if they are making nuclear weapons and allow nuclear inspectors unfettered access and visit their nuclear facilities? That worked pretty well when Obama asked nicely to have their drone back.

I would love to see USA play nice and allow unfettered investigations into their nuclear facilities and nicely hand back drones that were downed in their country.

but hey, if your government can make it a law to forbid unfettered investigations of agricultural farms, then I can imagine their laws on unfettered investigations of nuclear facilities would be a tad stronger.
 
I would love to see USA play nice and allow unfettered investigations into their nuclear facilities and nicely hand back drones that were downed in their country.

but hey, if your government can make it a law to forbid unfettered investigations of agricultural farms, then I can imagine their laws on unfettered investigations of nuclear facilities would be a tad stronger.

Somehow agricultural farms do not have the capability to wipe out cities in a single blow.
 
All this saber rattling against Iran really blows my mind.
I guess the propaganda is damned good, I grudgingly admit.
 
Um, even Washington is uncertain about Israel's claims and you happen to possess more information than they do?

Please provide any credible viable source that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Iran plans to bomb Israel.

Ok, here you go:

Former Iranian Guard Turned CIA - A7 Exclusive Features - News - Israel National News

Now, run along and prove that Iran has absolutely no intention of bombing Israel, plans to send charitable donations to victims of terrorism in Israel, and will join hands and sing "Kumbayah" with them. :ty:
 
Somehow agricultural farms do not have the capability to wipe out cities in a single blow.

ok kookoonutty, somehow you managed to twist what I wrote into the most bizarre way. I said if your country can have such strict laws about unfettered investigations of their farms, I can't imagine they would be more lax about investigations of their nuclear facilities or relaxed about foreign drones landing in the US and then, play nice and just hand back the drones and yet you, ever so condescendingly said Iran should play nice and hand back the drone that was illegally in their country and stand aside while the US investigate their facilities.
 
ok kookoonutty, somehow you managed to twist what I wrote into the most bizarre way. I said if your country can have such strict laws about unfettered investigations of their farms, I can't imagine they would be more lax about investigations of their nuclear facilities or relaxed about foreign drones landing in the US and then, play nice and just hand back the drones and yet you, ever so condescendingly said Iran should play nice and hand back the drone that was illegally in their country and stand aside while the US investigate their facilities.

Why the calling of names? Do you have an argument to present or would you rather call names instead?
 
Maybe we can ask nicely to Iran if they are making nuclear weapons and allow nuclear inspectors unfettered access and visit their nuclear facilities? That worked pretty well when Obama asked nicely to have their drone back.

It also worked well when W Bush asked Iraq for those same allowances. He attacked, and we are still there. If Obama attacks Iran, using the same timeline, will you support him? Or should he hold off until after election 2012?
 
ok kookoonutty, somehow you managed to twist what I wrote into the most bizarre way. I said if your country can have such strict laws about unfettered investigations of their farms, I can't imagine they would be more lax about investigations of their nuclear facilities or relaxed about foreign drones landing in the US and then, play nice and just hand back the drones and yet you, ever so condescendingly said Iran should play nice and hand back the drone that was illegally in their country and stand aside while the US investigate their facilities.

I was stating the obvious when it comes down to the issue of nuclear weapons and nothing to do with twisting what you wrote. Farms can't bomb cities. That was my point. Iran has the will and intention of wanting to "wipe Israel off the map."
 
I was stating the obvious when it comes down to the issue of nuclear weapons and nothing to do with twisting what you wrote. Farms can't bomb cities. That was my point. Iran has the will and intention of wanting to "wipe Israel off the map."

forget the stupid farms, you know what i meant yet you continue to be an a...and talk about how farms can't bomb cities - i never said that yet you twisted it that way. unreal.

and by the way, USA has launched far more wars than Iran ever has in the past century and they have very high stockpiles of nuclear weapons, far far far more than Iran does.

just an FYI.


Iran’s Nuclear Threat—Real or Not? : The New Yorker

In Praise of the Balance of Power in the Middle East « IRAN, a New Pearl Harbour

Oil: Iran's Hormuz Strait Threats Could Wreak Global Economic Havoc - Forbes

"Although sanctions and diplomatic pressure appear to be Washington’s preferred course of action, Israelis have been sending mixed signals, unnerving their Iranian enemies."

Threat of military strikes on Iran begins era of struggle, fear | News | National Post
 
forget the stupid farms, you know what i meant yet you continue to be an a...and talk about how farms can't bomb cities - i never said that yet you twisted it that way. unreal.

and by the way, USA has launched far more wars than Iran ever has in the past century and they have very high stockpiles of nuclear weapons, far far far more than Iran does.

just an FYI.


Iran’s Nuclear Threat—Real or Not? : The New Yorker

In Praise of the Balance of Power in the Middle East « IRAN, a New Pearl Harbour

Oil: Iran's Hormuz Strait Threats Could Wreak Global Economic Havoc - Forbes

"Although sanctions and diplomatic pressure appear to be Washington’s preferred course of action, Israelis have been sending mixed signals, unnerving their Iranian enemies."

Threat of military strikes on Iran begins era of struggle, fear | News | National Post

What you wrote: "somehow you managed to twist what I wrote into the most bizarre way".....hence, I twisted nothing what you wrote. I was making my own point.
 
"Although sanctions and diplomatic pressure appear to be Washington’s preferred course of action, Israelis have been sending mixed signals, unnerving their Iranian enemies."

Of course, Iran has done many things to unnerve Israel......talk about mixed signals.
 
Maybe we can ask nicely to Iran if they are making nuclear weapons and allow nuclear inspectors unfettered access and visit their nuclear facilities? That worked pretty well when Obama asked nicely to have their drone back.

It also worked well when W Bush asked Iraq for those same allowances. He attacked, and we are still there. If Obama attacks Iran, using the same timeline, will you support him? Or should he hold off until after election 2012?

I was making my own point.
Me too. Trying again...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top