deafdrummer
Active Member
- Joined
- May 17, 2009
- Messages
- 1,240
- Reaction score
- 12
I don't understand??? I know that the American Indians are the only true Native Americans but at this point I'm tired of all the African American, Mexican American, etc. crap! If that is the case then I'm a European American or a Heinz 57 American or a Mutt American. We are all Americans if we were born here or immigrated legally and became citizens! I am not degrading the Indians as I would love to be able to prove my heritage. I would like to know more about the DNA testing. Is it accurate and how much does it cost? Where does one get it done?
I'm just saying that that was an explosive statement, and I was hiding under the chair because that it's just not something to say without ascertaining what could go flying across the room. I hate getting into labels, but here goes.
You ARE an American, but not Native American or Indian in the traditional sense of the word. However, let's take this to another level. Was it appreciated by the Indians that the land they lived on was taken from them for their own use? Does the "legal immigration laws" only give license to "immigrants" to be able to "legally steal" the land that was being used by the Indians to start with? Does the United States of America have any moral reason to exist, since it was based on invading and eventually taking over enough land to eventually create a "statist" system based upon the US Constitution, that without the Bill of Rights, would have created a completely unlimited government (hence, the fight between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalist)? Before you answer that, please ask that of the victims of the forced removals that resulted from the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Yes, Congress gave THEMSELVES "legal license" to push aside the Indians so that the "immigrants" could take what wasn't theirs.
It appears that my great-great grandmother whom you saw in the photo was just a baby during the forced march, IF she had been born then. Her mother was 35, and her father was 50 at the time of the march into Indian territory. The 1850 census of the town they were in appears to confirm that she was 12 years old that year, so she was born in 1838, hopefully before the forced march. I can also confirm that her parents were farmer and housewife. Her future husband, a day laborer, shows up in the 1860 census, about two years older than her. He evidently was on the march at two years old. The next census shows her with five children, so the one person in the photo with six people together has one man who is really part of the other family that is Scandinavian, I BELIEVE (jesus, this is complicated!). This last point, I don't know for sure, but the rest of it, yes.
Last edited: