Inappropriate Signatures/Avatars - THE POLL

[Kalista]

You leave "The Closet" alone! If 'The Closet' should be removed, the I'd say the the sub forum "Christianity, Religion, Spiritual and Other Beliefs" should be removed because there are so many perverted priests/ deacons/ altar boys who molested kids! What a hypocrite! FYI: I fight fiercely to protect the Gay and Lesbian Community!
If you don't like to read what Gay and Lesbian people have to say, then don't
go in there .. I avoid "Christianity, Religion, Spiritual and Other Beliefs" as much as I can becuase I don't agree with them.

We do respect your Gay and Lesbian. it does not bother me at all. As for the regilious, it is very heat to debate. Just like cochlear implants, I am very against it. It is hard for me to not debate that issues about CI and religious.

By the way, I would like to be a friendly to remind you. If it is possible for you to change your avatar as appropriate picture. Please think of the children.

Thanks,

 

[Liebling:-)))]

You leave "The Closet" alone! If 'The Closet' should be removed, the I'd say the the sub forum "Christianity, Religion, Spiritual and Other Beliefs" should be removed because there are so many perverted priests/ deacons/ altar boys who molested kids! What a hypocrite! FYI: I fight fiercely to protect the Gay and Lesbian Community!

I can't see the sense why anyone tried to hide something from the kids... *shake my head* It would not solve anything when you try to hide kids from something... They will experiment their curious with wrong peers and go bad way... because their parents hide something from them...

Of course my kids know what Gay and Lesbian, sex, reglious, color skins, etc... Why should anyone forbid the kids to know anything... ? I teach them to accept what they are...

One thing I'm agree is PORN... the kids should not see it... because porn is not belong warm, loving and attention but extreme... My kids watch sex on TV (not porn movies but romantic movies because sex related to nature, loving, attention and warm... not extreme porn). I began notice that porn movies are the worst and too extreme than 1970s porn movies time... *sigh*

 

[IslandGal]

I don't like the way the poll questions were worded. I think Alex should have strarted the poll

I also think Alex or any other moderators should have started the poll with proper questions.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

Originally Posted by bbnt
I don't like the way the poll questions were worded. I think Alex should have strarted the poll

Yes I'm with you... I thinking about create an other thread with right poll but I think it's better to leave Alex to create his thread with poll?

 

[EyesBlueDeaf]

I can't see the sense why anyone tried to hide something from the kids... *shake my head* It would not solve anything when you try to hide kids from something... They will experiment their curious with wrong peers and go bad way... because their parents hide something from them...

Of course my kids know what Gay and Lesbian, sex, reglious, color skins, etc... Why should anyone forbid the kids to know anything... ? I teach them to accept what they are...

One thing I'm agree is PORN... the kids should not see it... because porn is not belong warm, loving and attention but extreme... My kids watch sex on TV (not porn movies but romantic movies because sex related to nature, loving, attention and warm... not extreme porn). I began notice that porn movies are the worst and too extreme than 1970s porn movies time... *sigh*

You cannot hide children from seeing what's going on in the real world and even on TV!

 

[Sweetmind]

I believe it s not necessary to have those dirty trashy anywhere on the internet. There are so many ways for those children to read behind the parents, teachers, and adults back. They are getting the wrong impression from people in this society.

We have enough of sexual harrassment. There are a lot of people who do not realized that there are a sexual harrassment that u can arrest for it.

We need to show that we are a good example and respect people that we have a moral value that need to teach our young children or teenagers. They are getting the wrong message thats where they get too many mixed messages going on this society.

RESPECT is the most important thing.

I wouldnt go there to check because it s too immature and has no respect for women s personal thing that shouldnt be joking around as well.

Women are human being as is. So therefore men and women should respect for themselves and others.

Thanks!
Sweetmind

 

[IslandGal]

You cannot hide children from seeing what's going on in the real world and even on TV!

So true.
Look at the commercials on TV where women model in their bras and panties and men in their boxers. Do we see them as porn? No.

 

[web730]

You leave "The Closet" alone! If 'The Closet' should be removed, the I'd say the the sub forum "Christianity, Religion, Spiritual and Other Beliefs" should be removed because there are so many perverted priests/ deacons/ altar boys who molested kids! What a hypocrite! FYI: I fight fiercely to protect the Gay and Lesbian Community!
If you don't like to read what Gay and Lesbian people have to say, then don't go in there .. I avoid "Christianity, Religion, Spiritual and Other Beliefs" as much as I can because I don't agree with them.
I agree with VamPyroX.. Children shouldn't be here or in other forums.. And parents should supervise them.

It's obviously wrong and how pervented it's with those catholic priests and its staff who molested the kids. I agree. But I'm no catholic. You label all churches and other religions all the same as them ... wrong! You should know that.

Hey, look at your avatar and think hard. Your pervented avatar is so nasty and so demoralizing. What would it be any harm to change your avatar out of respect?

You guys don't care about those innocent children, really. Not only for kids' sake but AllDeaf members too. Please respect our wishes for the sake.

 

[web730]

Mookie,

I'm confused. I thought that you do believe Christ and God. So ??

 

[Mookie]

Not to be splitting hairs, but to hear that one is "doing this for the kids" is rather amusing.
I mean, they are, or should be, in bed by now, right?

Beo, I am surprised--are you saying that when the kids get up in the morning, all the stuff I'm railing against will just suddenly be gone cuz the lil ones are getting up?

I've spent 36 years working with kids from elementary thru HS and recently retired so please give me a little credit for the path I chose.

Isn't it a time for you to unretire and go back to school? Oh, are you really afriad of the modern kids right now since they are much smarter than you old fashioned teacher? They already know what's going on in the world while surfing the high speed Internet service while you are reading the magazines with snail mail service?

Ah, you can never abuse verbally and phyically to the modern kids right now. No wonder why you dearly miss your old-fashioned discipline. You are so lucky that you are retired right now since you can not afford to loss your retirement benefits and avoid the lawsuits from parents...

If you do not the AD policy, stay off...

Mookie as a bad student...

Welcome to the new technology world in 21th century.

 

[IslandGal]

By the way I wouldn't consider that as a porno. Just an innocent kid and humoring picture.

If you think that way then you should be able to look at Eyes' avatar as humor not porn

 

[Cheri]

Since arguing about mildly pornography avatars, What about those members who spoke sexuality in open forums, Yes, Kalista had, CyberRed had, and few other members as well had, and you wanted to remove an avatar or signature of a mild porno of showing an ass because you are worried more about the kids, What about your dirty foul mouth? Isn't that suitable? I think not. Those who are against those "mildly" porno avatars and signatures are just hypocrite.

Just my two cents.

 

[Reba]

Just because I have a "right" doesn't mean I would use that right. I don't really have a desire to shock or offend.

You are correct! Self restraint is a sign of maturity and consideration for others.

 

[Mookie]

I voted No!

Heck, they can be sued by kids' parents who may later discover that their kids are exposed to, I believe that it can happen.

How is that possibly to sue webmasters by the parents? Show me a proof.

Quit creating false tales.

If you are so smart as a computer nerdo, why do you not set your own deaf website? I am sure that yours would be very bored because of your stupid policy. However, there will have some deaf, HH, CI, deaf-impaired people will be visiting your clean forum for deaf.

I am sure that you love minor dirty jokes just like any church people do....

Yeah right....

 

[Mookie]

I don't like the way the poll questions were worded. I think Alex should have strarted the poll

Agree!

That's how Eve created....

 

[Reba]

I think "Yes, as long as it is not X-rated." should also be one of the options in the poll

That's one of the problems. There doesn't seem to be a general agreement as to what is "X-rated". Not everyone shares the same standards.

 

[Reba]

As long as the members knows porn avators and signatures are not acceptance but sense of humors...

I noticed some of members compare "porn" with "nudist" which it's not.

Remember:

Porn related to Prevert
Sexual/Nudist related to Natural.

Definition of pornography:

por·nog·ra·phy
[French pornographie, from pornographe, pornographer, from Late Greek pornographos, writing about prostitutes, pornē, prostitute, + graphein, to write; see –graphy.]

noun
Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

http://www.ask.com/reference/dictionary/ahdict/31710/pornography

Apparently, you have a more liberal definition of pornography than even the dictionary has.

That's the problem with saying, "just no porn." Your concept of porn and my concept of porn are not the same.

 

[web730]

How is that possibly to sue webmasters by the parents? Show me a proof.

Quit creating false tales.

If you are so smart as a computer nerdo, why do you not set your own deaf website? I am sure that yours would be very bored because of your stupid policy. However, there will have some deaf, HH, CI, deaf-impaired people will be visiting your clean forum for deaf.

I am sure that you love minor dirty jokes just like any church people do....

Yeah right....

I wish I could establish a cleaner forum where no dirties or pervents could foul. But I have other web businesses to build and run, etc. No time for that and I do enjoy surfing this forum except these two forums that I can only avoid. Is there a freedom of speech? Yeah so we're also free to say something that's so offensive against our wishes.

 

[IslandGal]

Since arguing about mildly pornography avatars, What about those members who spoke sexuality in open forums, Yes, Kalista had, CyberRed had, and few other members as well had, and you wanted to remove an avatar or signature of a mild porno of showing an ass because you are worried more about the kids, What about your dirty foul mouth? Isn't that suitable? I think not. Those who are against those "mildly" porno avatars and signatures are just hypocrite.

Just my two cents.

and well said there.

 

[PurrMeow]

well I ain't gonna to say which I vote. this is really up to ALEX since this is his form and his decision to make!!