I love the locked threads

[deafgal001]

Lol! I saw what you did!

 

[posts from hell]

Lol! I saw what you did!

hahahahaha

 

[TXgolfer]

I don't have a pole long enough to touch this one.

I do.....just ask the TSA

 

[deafgal001]

hahahahaha

So which was it: your post... or you requested your thread to close?

 

[posts from hell]

So which was it: your post... or you requested your thread to close?

i requested it to be locked :P

I didnt say "bets on which thread will be locked after excessive butthurt"

 

[deafgal001]

i requested it to be locked :P

I didnt say "bets on which thread will be locked after excessive butthurt"

Remind me not to play poker with you.... I would be in debt by now.

 

[rockdrummer]

That silly ass thread should have been locked anyway.

 

[posts from hell]

That silly ass thread should have been locked anyway.

Because you didn't like the facts?

 

[posts from hell]

Remind me not to play poker with you.... I would be in debt by now.

This actually happened....

After a huge bet made by me on the river... Guy asks me: "Do you have a flush?" I say "Nope, i promise." He pondered then went ahead and called.. He announced "I have a straight..." I said "I have a straight..." then he interrupted saying "me too!!" then I finished up with a "...flush."

Straight flush over a straight.

:pokerface:

 

[kokonut]

More like exaggeration.

 

[posts from hell]

More like exaggeration.

??? What are you directing that to? My poker hand? If so, there was 40 people who saw it.

 

[kokonut]

Not about poker.

 

[posts from hell]

Not about poker.

okay, if we don't know what you're talking about... we simply dont know..

 

[kokonut]

We do.

 

[rockdrummer]

Because you didn't like the facts?

No it's because you only paint a partial picture. I have no problem with facts as long as they are presented in an objective manner in order to give folks the opportunity to make an informed decision. Partial information providers make me suspicious of hidden agendas.

 

[Daredevel7]

No it's because you only paint a partial picture. I have no problem with facts as long as they are presented in an objective manner in order to give folks the opportunity to make an informed decision. Partial information providers make me suspicious of hidden agendas.

Don't worry. All you have to do is take the most extreme of both sides and do this:

Truth = avg(Poster1, Poster2)

 

[posts from hell]

No it's because you only paint a partial picture. I have no problem with facts as long as they are presented in an objective manner in order to give folks the opportunity to make an informed decision. Partial information providers make me suspicious of hidden agendas.

Even Faire Jour confirmed, need anything more?

 

[posts from hell]

Don't worry. All you have to do is take the most extreme of both sides and do this:

Truth = avg(Poster1, Poster2)

With FJ confirmation... Lots less needed to be said.

 

[deafbajagal]

It does crack me up when HEARING people get in a hot debate about what's best for the deaf people. Don't get me wrong...plenty of hearing people have the extensive knowledge and expertise to throw their weight around, etc. But it is ironic how some hearing people get so passionate about deafness that by speaking up for the deaf, they are in fact, oppressing them by indicating deaf people cannot speak up for themselves. lol

 

[faire_jour]

Even Faire Jour confirmed, need anything more?

I didn't confirm a thing. I said that I know of an FDA site that tracks CI complications. I did not say that I saw or believed the numbers you were posting. Nope.