Oceanbreeze
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2004
- Messages
- 9,973
- Reaction score
- 5
Thank you. That is exactly what I was saying. It's incredulous to me that some think the device lasts a lifetime. It doesn't.
The more reason to eliminate the oral-ONLY philosophy.
Nodding agreement.
But, we've gotten waaaay off the point. This has turned into a CI discussion and I'm sure that is the last thing Flip wanted.
My apologies, Flip. I just carried it further because I had a pretty good sense that you weren't interested in the CI.
Surgical risk is only part of it. There are also a lot of aural rehabilitation that goes with getting a CI; especially for those that choose to implant later in life. It's not like you have surgery and you can understand everything right away. You have to learn what sounds mean. There's a lot of work involved for someone who chooses that route. Its not to be taken lightly.
Thank you. That is exactly what I was saying. It's incredulous to me that some think the device lasts a lifetime. It doesn't.
I believe that the person you are quoting has bilateral implants. I don't think you need to tell them the work involved with getting a CI.
wait wait wait wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE ALL HAVE TO BE REIMPLANTED!!!!!????!!?!?!?!??!?!?!?
But how do we know when we have to be reimplanted? I got my CI surgery in 1993 and I'm 20 years old now...so....does that mean I have to get a surgery in few years?!??!?!?!?! And....every 20 years in my life time???!?!? >.< >.< >.<
Man, it looks like it's going to be super expensive go undergo surgery =/ =/
Even if it does, people do have medical conditions in their lifetime that they may or may not have to remove their implant *thinking about my mom's radiation treatment for cancer*
Even if it does, people do have medical conditions in their lifetime that they may or may not have to remove their implant *thinking about my mom's radiation treatment for cancer*
Why on earth would someone need to remove their implant for a medical treatment such as cancer treatment?
There's lots of reasons why someone may need to have a reimplantation. Simple failure from a lifetime of use would do it.
this whole discussion about cis is moot. Flip isn't interested in them, so can we move on, please? I just was merely pointing out that the ci doesn't last forever. :roll:
Some people cant accept CI failures so they get thier kids reimplanted. nothing more and nothing less.
I believe that the person you are quoting has bilateral implants. I don't think you need to tell them the work involved with getting a CI.
did I say they need to remove it for cancer treatment? I was just thinking about medical issues that come along the way. They may or MAY NOT have to remove it. infections, damage from too many exposures, etc. who knows?
I just was merely pointing out that the CI doesn't last forever. :roll:
I'm surprised some are hijacking Flip's thread to spout nonsense about technology with which they are unfamiliar.
We certainly intend to upgrade Li-Li's technology as she grows older, that's a given according to our plans. I've mentioned that several times on the forum. That the device will fail or that someone will have to have revision surgery or be re-implanted is not a given. There are many, many adults who have been implanted who will not require additional surgery.
I'm not sure why Oceanbreeze is turning this thread into a discussion about CIs. Seems pretty disrespectful to the point of Flip's post, which I respect: that we don't really need to be focusing our discussion of wellbeing around (and conversely, our issues with) CIs.
Would probably be best if you stop bringing up CIs, at least in this thread.