House successfully vote to help raise taxes against poor and middle class

[jillio]

Try again. Again it's obvious when you consider income disparity and the ability to manage increasing costs.

Still doesn't explain "only". And it isn't obvious. Are you having difficulty explaining?

 

[Jiro]

Still doesn't explain "only". And it isn't obvious. Are you having difficulty explaining?

or are you having difficulty in giving the straight answers instead of obfuscation and redirection?

 

[kokonut]

Er, use your brain and your degrees. It's obvious when it comes to income disparity. You don't need a degree to see that anyways. :roll:

 

[jillio]

or are you having difficulty in giving the straight answers instead of obfuscation and redirection?

I'm not giving answers. I'm asking questions. That aren't getting answered.

 

[jillio]

Er, use your brain and your degrees. It's obvious when it comes to income disparity. You don't need a degree to see that anyways. :roll:

Guess you can't answer the questions. As I thought.

 

[Jiro]

I'm not giving answers. I'm asking questions. That aren't getting answered.

hence obfuscation and redirection.

 

[jillio]

hence obfuscation and redirection.

But not from me. From the one that is having problems answering a direct question. Perhaps you should consult a dictionary on the meaning of obfuscation and redirection.

 

[Jiro]

But not from me. From the one that is having problems answering a direct question. Perhaps you should consult a dictionary on the meaning of obfuscation and redirection.

I did check the dictionary and this is what I see -

 

[darkdog]

Nice to see you have finally gotten the message.

You know, I was poking fun at your anti-intellectual style of debate. The fact that you embraced my unflattering characterization of your debate style is, well, kinda funny.

It's almost as if you lack the ability to back up your bald assertions with facts and logic, so you get a Ph.D. to wave over everyone's head and assert your intellectual superiority.

 

[sequoias]

:roll:

 

[jillio]

I did check the dictionary and this is what I see -

You have just provided a perfect example of the two. Your ad hominem attacks thinly disquised as humor.

 

[jillio]

You know, I was poking fun at your anti-intellectual style of debate. The fact that you embraced my unflattering characterization of your debate style is, well, kinda funny.

It's almost as if you lack the ability to back up your bald assertions with facts and logic, so you get a Ph.D. to wave over everyone's head and assert your intellectual superiority.

Obviously, the intellect has gone straight over your head. Not good with sublety, are you?

And, quite obviously very threatened by an educated woman. You might want to work on that.

 

[Jolie77]

Mod's Note:

This thread is closed for a review.

Evidently, There are a lot of bantering going on and that loses the purpose of the thread itself.

Actions will be taken shortly after this.